Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fitting parameters, dynamic susceptibility

The theory was tested with the aid of an ample data array on low-frequency magnetic spectra of solid Co-Cu nanoparticle systems. In doing so, we combined it with the two most popular volume distribution functions. When the linear and cubic dynamic susceptibilities are taken into account simultaneously, the fitting procedure yields a unique set of magnetic and statistical parameters and enables us to conclude the best appropriate form of the model distribution function (histogram). For the case under study it is the lognormal distribution. [Pg.469]

Similar heterogeneous model has been used to develop a relaxation function by Chamberlin and Kingsbury (1994), who consider the localized normal modes to be involved in the relaxation process. Localized (domains) regions are assumed to be present between Tg and T. They are described as dynamically correlated domains (DCD). A Gaussian distribution of the domain sizes has been assumed, with each domain characterized by a Debye relaxation time. Expressions for the dielectric susceptibility have been derived and used to fit the experimental susceptibilities of salol, glycerol and many other substances with remarkable agreement over 13 decades of frequency (even when only one adjustable parameter is employed). [Pg.105]


See other pages where Fitting parameters, dynamic susceptibility is mentioned: [Pg.38]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.214]   


SEARCH



Dynamic parameters

Fitted parameters

Parameters, fitting

Susceptibility dynamic

Susceptibility dynamical

© 2024 chempedia.info