Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Finite concentration surface coverage

The relationships of Equations 5 and 2 are unquestionably valid for unlimited surface coverage on ideal external open (flat, planar, accessible) surfaces ranging from nil at E to infinity at E=0. All of the inherent assumptions (tabulated above) are equally valid as models for physical adsorption in internal constricted regions. These are classically denoted as ultramicropores ( 2 nm), micropores(<2 nm), mesopores (2<1000nm) and macropores (very large and difficult to define with adsorption isotherm). In these instances there are finite concentration limits corresponding to the volume (space, void) size domain(s). Although caution is needed to deduce models from thermodynamic data, we can expect to observe linear relationships over the respective domains. The results will be consistent with, albeit not absolute proof of the models. [Pg.277]

Since IGC is able to generate adsorption isotherms and to evaluate acid/base interactions for specified adsorbate-adsorbent pairs, it follows that the technique is able to develop a detailed picture of surface properties for non-volatile stationary phases. This is illustrated, again for carbon fibers, by Vukov and Gray (48). They combine IGC information at essentially zero coverage of the injected probes with finite concentration data to obtain heat of adsorption values ranging from zero to multi-layer coverage. Their meticulous study shows the effects of thermal pretreatment on fiber surface characteristics, and underscores the convenience and power of IGC to generate information otherwise far more difficult to obtain. [Pg.7]

Zero coverage. In order to eliminate physically adsorbed species, fibers were cleaned by heating at 160°C In a N2 (Linde, ultra high purity, with C02 content less than 1 ppm) atmosphere until constant retention volumes were obtained (100 to 120 h). Using finite concentration IGC and n-alkanes as sorbates, the surface area of these fibers was determined to be 0.40 m g"1 and 0.59 m g 1 for T-300 and P-55, respectively. The n-alkanes octane to trldecane (analytical grade) were obtained from Polyscience Corporation (Quantklt). Retention data were measured with a Hewlett-... [Pg.171]

Therefore, it can be concluded that the finite rate of the reorientation of P-lactoglobulin molecules in the adsorption layer, i.e. the oversaturation of the interfacial layer by molecules in an extended state (maximum molar area), leads to a faster surface tension decrease at low protein concentrations. At larger concentrations the reorientation step becomes less important and at higher concentrations (higher surface coverage) the adsorption process is completely described by the diffusional transport in the solution bulk. [Pg.371]

In contrast to IGC-ID, a measurable amount of probe is injected in the column resulting in a large range of coverage ratios of the solid surface by the probe. Injections of liquid probe of a few microliters are required for ICG in finite concentration conditions. The injected volume is mainly dependent on the surface area developed by the solid in the chromatographic column, and on the measurement temperature. [Pg.781]

Two cases may arise. If the intermediate species is a surface species, i.e., strongly adsorbed and at a negligible concentration in solution, the change is limited practically to the surface concentration only, which can vary from surface coverage zero to unity. Hence, the maximum amount of the intermediate that can be formed or removed will be of the order of 10 molcm . However, when the intermediate has a finite stability in solution, as is the case with copper, the steady state can in theory be reached only after the concentration has been appropriately adjusted throughout the bulk of the solution. Hence, the amount of charge for charging the pseudocapacitance... [Pg.481]

It was emphasized in Section 4.2 that GSC is the only method of studying adsorption characteristics of surfaces at very low coverage. At the same time the methods apply at higher concentrations if chromatographic techniques are used for finite concentrations (e.g. elution on a plateau, which was described in Section 5.1.3). Thus a range of concentrations of the adsorbed substance may be covered and hence the adsorption isotherms can be determined [112, 113]. [Pg.148]

This result assumes that surface coverage depends linearly on the injected substance concentration in the gas phase, which is rigorously true only on homogeneous surfaces at very low coverage. For small but finite values ot kJF, eqn (5.85) shows that the sharp peak at F = Fj, + F is modified by a long tail at F > Vm -f- F (Fig. 5.21, curve 4). [Pg.182]

The finite surface kinetics were treated by considering the step function in flux produced by the potential step. Any change in the surface coverage of adsorbed hydrogen is assumed to cause an instantaneous change in the flux just inside the metal surface. The implicit rationale behind this assumption, as indicated in Section III.l, can be explained on the basis of Eq. (7), which results when the entry of hydrogen is restricted since the coverage is assumed to be constant under potentiostatic conditions, and therefore D dC/dx)x=Q, are kept constant. The subsurface concentration at the entry side increases with time until it reaches a steady state. The concentration profile and a typical anodic transient are shown in Fig. 4. [Pg.78]

The first assumption implies that the current efficiency for promoter formation is a decreasing function of time during polarization. The competing reaction is oxygen evolution at the tpb. The second assumption implies that the concentration of the promoter at the catalyst/gas interface is uniform and equal to that at the tpb. With thin catalyst films this is a reasonable assumption, while for high catalyst loadings a finite surface diffusivity of the promoter has to be considered. The third assumption may be best satisfied close to open-circuit conditions, i.e. at low promoter coverage. [Pg.204]


See other pages where Finite concentration surface coverage is mentioned: [Pg.107]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.665]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.665]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.254]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.18 , Pg.178 ]




SEARCH



Finite concentration

Surface concentrations

Surfaces concentrator

© 2024 chempedia.info