Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Filtering media, comparison

Procedure Proceed as directed for Acid resistance stage with a new set of capsules from the same batch. After 2 h, replace the acid Medium with the buffer Medium and continue the test for 45 more minutes. Determine the amount of C17H19N3O3S dissolved from UV absorbances at the wavelength of maximum absorbance at about 305 nm on portions of the solutions under test passed through 0.2-p.m nylon filter, in comparison with a Standard solution having a known concentration of USP Omeprazole RS and the same Medium. [Pg.203]

For the majority of products, resistance of the filter medium is negligible in comparison to resistance of the cake, thus Eq. (1) becomes... [Pg.244]

As discussed in the theory section of this chapter, the filter medium is an insignificant resistance to flow, in comparison to the cake. However, if the filter medium retains a high amount of fines, the subsequent cake that builds up becomes more resistant to filtration, thus the degree of clarity required in the filtrate can be a trade-off to capacity. [Pg.249]

Although this technique is widely used to characterise pore size, other techniques are also used, not least amongst which are challenge tests (see Rideal, 2005) in which the filter medium is challenged by a quantity of calibrated micro-spheres, which are fluidised, typically by sonic means, to assist in their passage through the filter. Comparison is then made of the particle size distribution of the micro-spheres before and after filtration. [Pg.241]

There are three important types of metallic filter medium wire mesh, sintered powder, and random fiber. Wire mesh comes in a square weave or Dutch twill (woven in parallel diagonal lines). The different filter media do not perform equally with respect to their ability to hold contaminant, capture gels, etc. [11, 12]. A relative performance comparison is shown in Table 3.7. [Pg.73]

Fig. 7. (a) and (b) SEM images of filter walls, (c) backscattered SEM image of a filter wall, (d) binary thresholded image. The pore space is denoted in black color, (e) Computer reconstruction of filter shown in (d) and (f) Comparison of autocorrelation function of reconstructed medium to that of the real filter. [Pg.222]

The flow resistance behavior of the reconstructed medium can now be examined by performing 3D flow simulations with the Lattice Boltzmann method (Chen and Doolen, 1998), and obtaining the permeability of the material (Konstandopoulos, 2003). Figure 8(a) depicts a visualization of 3D flow tubes and flow velocity distributions at different cross sections in a reconstructed filter material. Figure 8(b) shows the comparison of computer simulated and experimental permeabilities obtained with the experimental protocol described in Konstandopoulos (2003). [Pg.223]

Thus the filtration resistivity of the medium includes its thickness. Typical measured values of Rf are of the order of 10lom-1 for comparison, the fine filter sheet of Table 1.6, assuming it to be 1 mm thick, has LIKP =0.001/0.15(1(T12) = 0.7(1010) m1. [Pg.313]

Experimental details.656 A benzene solution of 87 in a quartz vessel was irradiated with a medium-pressure mercury lamp (benzene filters to cut off the wavelengths below 280nm) (Figure 3.9) to give an 87% yield of 86 in 3h. In comparison, sunlight irradiation of 87 in 5% methanolic seawater in a glass vessel produced 86 in 37% yield in 8 days. [Pg.250]

Depending on the size of the particles and the pore size distribution of the porous medium, solid particles can be removed on the surface of the porous medium (filter cake) or inside the medium (deep filtration). If the particle size is larger than the pore throat diameter of the porous media, then particles will be separated on the face of the porous medium (i.e., form a skin) and will not deeply penetrate the porous medium (Figure 1). If the particle diameter is very small in comparison with pore... [Pg.294]

In preparative-scale (10 M 1-naphthol) experiments, an Ace-Hanovia 450-W medium-pressure mercury arc was used with a Pyrex filter sleeve and a magnetically stirred Ace water-cooled reaction vessel. In experiments involving rose bengal as a sensitizer, tungsten lamp illumination was used. Ultraviolet spectral changes were measured with a Perkin-Elmer model 552A spectrophotometer. For GC-MS analysis, a Hewlett-Packard 5985A instrument was used with a fused silica capillary column coated with a bonded nonpolar polymethyl silane phase introduced directly into the electron Impact ionization source. Compounds were tentatively identified by comparison to published spectra and confirmed where possible with authentic standard materials. [Pg.209]

Note See Safety Precautions in Section 6.1. before proceeding. The objective is to produce samples with a smooth (non-grainy) background in a medium with a refractive index of approximately 1.46. The technique below collajjses the filter for easier focusing and produces permanent mounts which are useful for quality control and interlaboratory comparison. [Pg.899]


See other pages where Filtering media, comparison is mentioned: [Pg.1605]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.1427]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.1609]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.948]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.726]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.824]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.494]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.34 ]




SEARCH



Filter medium

Filtering media

Filters comparison

© 2024 chempedia.info