Feedback controllers stability considerations

The notion of quantum feedback control naturally suggests a closed-loop process in the laboratory to stabilize or guide a system to a desired state. In addition, feedback is important in the design of molecular controls. These points will be made clear below, starting with considerations of design followed by a discussion of its role in the laboratory and finally leading to feedback concepts for the inversion of laboratory data. 

Therefore, considerable efforts were made on deposition in the transition mode of the reactive magnetron discharge, where nonstable conditions are used and where closed-loop feedback control is mandatory for process stabilization. 

It is probably apparent that most overrides are really feedback control loops. They therefore are subject to stability considerations. In many cases they are also subject to truly hard constraints, as, for example, maximum column-base pressure. Since any feedback control system must have some room within which to work, the overrides must be so designed that the process does not normally approach the hard constraints too closely. 

Automatization of all stages of the analytical process is a trend that can be discerned in the development of modern analytical methods for chemical manufacture, to various extents depending on reliability and cost-benefit considerations. Among the elements of reliability one counts conformity of the accuracy and precision of the method to the specifications of the manufacturing process, stability of the analytical system and closeness to real-time analysis. The latter is a requirement for feedback into automatic process-control systems. Since the investment in equipment for automatic online analysis may be high, this is frequently replaced by monitoring a property that is easy and inexpensive to measure and correlating that property with the analyte of interest. Such compromise is usually accompanied by a collection of samples that are sent to the analytical laboratory for determination, possibly at a lower cost. 

The point of departure for the constructive method was the consideration of a passive control structure in the light of a suitable definition of finite-time motion stability. Then, the related dynamical inverse yielded the controller and a recursive algorithm to design the nominal batch motion. The underlying solvability conditions were identifying. The combination of the controller with an observer with a compatible structure yielded the design of the output feedback tracking controller. 

---