Feedback controller design

They determined the controller gain, Kc, theoretically required to eliminate instability. 

Rovang and Randolph (1980) suggested and experimentally tested the use of extrapolation of the data from a Coulter Counter to determine the nuclei density in the fines dissolution loop. Randolph and Low (1981) demonstrated the similar use of a light scattering instrument to infer the fines-loop nuclei density. The use of this 

---

Most processes are openloop stable. However, the exothermic irreversible chemical reactor is a notable example of a process that can be openloop unstable. All real processes can be made closedloop unstable (unstable with a feedback controller in service) and therefore one of the principal objectives in feedback controller design is to avoid closedloop instability. 

A common performance estimation method in classical single-loop feedback controller design is to check the open-loop disturbance rejection of a system up to the point in time at which the controller action is assumed to take effect. If constraints are violated during this time, the controller cannot prevent the violation. The use of this test can be traced back to Velguth and Anderson (1954). 

Figure 16. lb gives the Nyquist plots of the plant and the two models. The model B curve is closer than the model A curve to the real process curve over the frequency range near the (- 1,0) point. Therefore, model B should be used for feedback controller design. 

The simplest possible form for a transfer function is a gain, an integrator, and a deadtime. We have used this model with good success on a variety of processes. It works well for feedback controller design because it does a good job in fitting the important frequency range near the (- 1,0) point. 

For an equimolar feed stream, SI, at 1,000 Ibmol/hr and 100°F, the flow rate of a toluene stream, S2, at SOT is adjusted to achieve a desired temperature of the mixer effluent (e.g., 85"F), as shown in Figure 4.8a. Convergence units for feedback control (design specifications) are shown on simulation flowsheets as dotted circles connected to streams and simulation units by dotted arcs. The arcs represent the information flow of stream variables to the control unit and information flow of adjusted equipment parameters to simulation units. Note that the control units of most simulators can adjust the flow rates of the streams. After the calculations by the MIXER subroutine are completed, the control subroutine samples the effluent temperature. It adjusts the flow rate of stream S2 when the specified temperature is not achieved and transfers to the MIXER subroutine to repeat the mixing calculations. This cycle is repeated until the convergence criteria are satisfied or the maximum number of iterations is exceeded. 

Figure 4.8 Feedback control—design specifications for the benzene-toluene mixer (a) ASPEN PLUS blocks (b) HYSYS.Plant icons.

The full actuation model is represented by G s)H s). Since H s) involves non-rational functions, such as sinh(-), cosh(-), and a/, it is infinitedimensional. For practical implementation of feedback control design, however, finite-dimensional models are desirable. Simple model reduction steps can be taken to obtain finite-dimensional models for IPMC actuators, by exploiting the knowledge of physical parameters and specific properties of hyperboiic functions. In particular, based on the physical parameters of IPMCs (see Section 4.2.3), 7(s) 10, and K 10 , and we can make... 

The constructive method, which is considered as a major breakthrough in control theory, was developed in the last decade. As it stands, the method is intended for feedback control design, and its application to the batch motion case requires the nominal output to be tracked and a suitable definition of finite-time batch motion stability. In a more applied eontext, the inverse optimality idea has been applied to design the nominal motion of homo [11] and copolymer [12] reactor, obtaining results that are similar to the ones drawn from direct optimization [4]. The motion was obtained from the recursive application of the process dynamical inverse [13], and the inverse yielded a nonlinear SF controller [9, 10] that was in turn used to specify a conventional feedforward-feedback industrial control scheme. However, the issues of motion stability and systematized search were not formally addressed. 

For processes with higher-order dynamics and/or time delay, the model can first be approximated by a low-order model, or the frequency response methods described in Chapter 14 can be employed to design controllers. First, the inner loop frequency response for a set-point change is calculated from (16-7), and a suitable value of Kc2 is determined. The offset is checked to determine whether PI control is required. After Kc2 is specified, the outer loop frequency response can be calculated, as in conventional feedback controller design. The open-loop transfer function used in this part of the calculation is... 

---