Fabry-Perot resonator calculation

We have used the much simpler conical horn on our detector and Fabry-Perot resonator. We may estimate the ratio of the beam waists for a scalar and conical horn by calculating the ratio of their grains =... 

The quantum fluctuations of the radiation phase manifest qualitative difference from those calculated within the Pegg-Barnett approach. In particular, the phase bunching effect can be observed for a multipole radiation in a spherical cavity in the quantum domain of low intensity. This effect does not occur in a linear cavity (Fabry-Perot resonator). 

The measurements done by Guo et al. [25] showed decay in the enhancement beyond approximately 80 nm. Their FDTD calculations instead showed a continued oscillation in the average field-squared at the position of the fluors out to at least 600 nm these oscillations correlate with Fabry-Perot resonances within the oxide, an observation which has been made previously by Andrewartha [59] for a similar type of structure (a "bottle grating interestingly calculations of the reflectivity from this related structure showed similar sharp oscillations [59]. The calculated oscillations originate from the interference between diffraction from the nanowire array and multiple reflections from the aluminum... 

The reflectance of the OLED, Rqled, is calculated using well-know iterative approach for multilayer optics (Macleod, 2001). It is interesting to note that this ap>proach can also be used not only to optimize (minimize) the reflectance of the OLED, but also to simultaneously optimize (maximize) its emission through the optimization of its transmittance (from the substrate towards the cathode), instead of using an exact expaession for the emission, such as Eq. 3. It is the comparison of Eq. 3 with the Fabry-Perot equation that makes it possible the position of the resonance peak in emission is first approximated by Eq. 4 from the Fabry-Perot transmittance peak, and then refined using Eq. 3 to maximize the emission. 

---