F and g values

If the G value of one of the gases, usually nitrogen, is taken as unity, G values of other gases and F values of different polymers can be calculated from Equation 1.109 and Equation 1.108. These values are reliable for gases but not for water vapor. Some F and G values for polymers are given in Table 1.18. Evidently, the F values correspond to the first column of Table 1.17, since G for N2 is 1. The G values for O2 and CO2 represent the averages of Poi/Pisi and PooilPiti in columns 5 and 6, respectively. 

Peters et al. (1985) reported the LIS values for O, C, and H for 1 1 adducts of adamantanone (fig. 1) with R(fod)3 shift reagents. Upon calculating the F,- and G, values using eq. (10), the F,- values obtained for the H nuclei were higher than those for the adjacent nuclei (cf. table 2, F, values before optimization). Since this is not likely to be the case, they used an iterative procedure based on eq. (10) to optimize three parameters, F G and Cj. In the first step, the value of Cj for each lanthanide was held constant using the Bleaney values, while F, and G,- were fit to eq. (10) by weighted... 

On the other hand, as detailed further in Appendix C, if the two properties (F and G) do not commute, the second measurement destroys knowledge of the first property s value. After the first measurement, P is an eigenfunction of F after the second measurement, it becomes an eigenfunction of G. If the two non-commuting operators properties are measured in the opposite order, the wavefunction first is an eigenfunction of G, and subsequently becomes an eigenfunction of F. 

P, V, h, and 5 interpolated and converted from Heat Exchanger Design Handbook, vol. 5, Hemisphere, Washington, DC, 1983 and reproduced in Beaton, C. F. and G. F. Hewitt, Physical Propeity Data for the Design Engineer, Hemisphere, New York, 1989 (394 pp-)- Other values compiled hy P. E. Liley An enthalpy-pressure diagram to 1000 psia, 250—500 F appears in J. Chem. Eng. Data 7, 1 (1962) 75-78. 

The minimum value of both F and G is found when the partial derivatives of F with respecl to are set equal to zero ... 

From a knowledge of various values of P it is possible to calculate F values for specific polymers and G values for specific gases if the G value for one of the gases, usually nitrogen, is taken as unity. These values are generally found to be accurate within a factor of 2 for gases but urtreliable with water vapour. Some... 

FIGURE 2.4 Determining resolution based on a peak-valley measurement for two-dimensional chromatography. The / and g values are measured and used to calculate P =f/g giving the resolution through Equation 2.9. Reprinted with permission from Murphy et al. (1998) by courtesy of the American Chemical Society. 

No matter what functions you substitute for "f" and "g", no matter what statement you use for "P", for each initial value of x, either both A and B loop or both A and B halt with the same values in registers y and u. ... 

We can extend this result a little. If we examine Example III-4, we see that we have altered P(A,B) to form P(A,B) by changing subschema (n+1). Since f and g are assumed to be distinct from the function letters a and b and from each other, if we enter (n+1) with different values for u and v the subscheme will not violate the definition of freeness. But if ws enter (n+1) with val(u) = val(v), then the subscheme behaves like the scheme in Example III-2, which we have seen is not strongly equivalent to any free scheme. Hence, similar arguments will show that now P(A,B) is strongly equivalent to some free scheme if and only if the Correspondence Problem for (A,B) has no solution. 

Recalculated values of j h and j d obtained from the results of Ayers(121) and Szekely(115) are shown in Figure 6.32 as curves F and G. It will be seen that the curves B, D, E, F, and G follow the same trend. 

The spreadsheet in Figure 13-13 computes [H ] and [OH ] in columns C and D. beginning in row 16. The mean fraction of protonation, oH(measured) from Equation 13-59. is in column E. The Bjerrum difference plot in Figure 13-14 shows mh(measured) versus pH. Values of aHiA and aHA from Equations 13-61 are computed in columns F and G. and nH(theoretical) was computed with Equation 13-60 in column H. Column I contains the squares of the residuals, [wH(measured) — mh(theoretical)]2. The sum of the squares of the residuals is in cell B12. 

This can be contrasted with reaction (h), which has a less — ve A S value, but this would be expected since the activated complex would have a —2 charge compared to —3 for reactions (f) and (g). This would lead to a less —ve contribution to A S from the charge and solvation effects. 

---