Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Explanation regresses

The final values of the rate constants along with their temperature dependencies were obtained with nonlinear regression analysis, which was applied to the differential equations. The model fits the experimental results well, having an explanation factor of 98%. Examples of the model fit are provided by Figures 8.3 and 8.4. An analogous treatment can be applied to other hemicelluloses. [Pg.176]

In the described MC simulation, the action of several simultaneous sources of variation is considered. The explanation of the different time courses of parameter influence on volume size between sensitivity and MCCC analyses lies in the fact that classic sensitivity analysis considers variations in model output due exclusively to the variation of one parameter component at a time, all else being equal. In these conditions, the regression coefficient between model output and parameter component value, in a small interval around the considered parameter, is approximately equal to the partial derivative of the model output with respect to the parameter component. [Pg.90]

An alternative and illuminating explanation of reduced rank regression is through a principal component analysis of Y, the set of fitted F-variables resulting from an unrestricted multivariate multiple regression. This interpretation reveals the two least-squares approximations involved projection (regression) of Y onto X, followed by a further projection (PCA) onto a lower dimensional subspace. [Pg.325]

Adverse effects on the thyroid have not been observed in children, however. In a study of inner-city children, linear regression analysis revealed that there was no association between PbB levels and either thyroxin or free thyroxin (Siegel et al. 1989). Similar findings were reported by Huseman et al. (1992) in a group of 12 children from the Omaha Lead and Poison Prevention Program with PbB levels in the range of 41 to 72 pg/dL. Siegel et al. (1989) offered four possible explanations to account for this apparent... [Pg.287]

A typical time profile of the excited PMMA-Phe fluorescence intensity decay is shown in Figure 2. The MEK permeation commences at 24 sec. The SPR increases during the plasticization period until it becomes constant, the onset of the steady state. It is characterized by a linear relationship between the amount of solvent absorbed and time. It was determined from a linear regression analysis that the PMMA-Phe fluorescence intensity starts to deviate from linearity at 197 sec. This indicates a decrease in the SPR and/or the unquenched PMMA-Phe. The decrease in SPR is unexpected at this film thickness since the SPR in thicker PMMA-Phe films show no anomaly at 1 /tm. A more plausible explanation is the reduction in available PMMA-Phe, which is expected when the front end of the SCP reaches the substrate. [Pg.389]

Figure 7.4 Relationship between Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and SPMD uptake-rate constants (ky.o and ku,s respectively), for test chemicals covering the range of test chemical log KqwS (250-ng treatment). Test chemicals within the range of log Kow 5.6 to 6.4 are shown as open symbols but are not used in the regression (see text for explanation). Reprinted from Huckins et al. (2004), copyright (2004) reproduced with permission from Alliance Communication Group. Figure 7.4 Relationship between Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and SPMD uptake-rate constants (ky.o and ku,s respectively), for test chemicals covering the range of test chemical log KqwS (250-ng treatment). Test chemicals within the range of log Kow 5.6 to 6.4 are shown as open symbols but are not used in the regression (see text for explanation). Reprinted from Huckins et al. (2004), copyright (2004) reproduced with permission from Alliance Communication Group.
Figure 7. Experimentally observed and mathematically simulated regression lines of foam stability at different percentages of glandless cottonseed flour in suspensions at various pH values. See Figure 6 for further explanation of the data. Figure 7. Experimentally observed and mathematically simulated regression lines of foam stability at different percentages of glandless cottonseed flour in suspensions at various pH values. See Figure 6 for further explanation of the data.
Chapter three presents the basic ideas of classical univariate calibration. These constitute the standpoint from which the natural and intuitive extension of multiple linear regression (MLR) arises. Unfortunately, this generalisation is not suited to many current laboratory tasks and, therefore, the problems associated with its use are explained in some detail. Such problems justify the use of other more advanced techniques. The explanation of what the... [Pg.331]

The other regressed properties for the method are found in Tables 5.7 and 5.8. The parameters listed in this monograph are a result of a multivariate Gauss-Newton optimization by Ballard (2002) to which the reader should refer if a more detailed explanation of the method and fitted parameters is required. [Pg.285]

The regression model is adequate with 99% confidence. It is evident from the former explanation that SSRD for k=2 includes 9 or 10 trials. Those points are defined by six points from two equilateral triangles that form a hexagon and 3 to 4 null points or three to four replications in the center of experiment. For k=3, SSRD corresponds to CCRD and includes twenty trials, six of which are replications in the center of experiment. For k=4, the so-called nonsymmetrical SSRD is constructed with 25 trials [10], five of which are replications in the center of experiment. For k=5, nonsymmetrical SSRD is also good and it has the same number of trials as CCRD. [Pg.435]

Although a complete model is virtually never available for in vivo experiments, a good approximation is often obtainable. Therefore, a theoretically correct regression vector ( bjdeai) should be calculated and examined for spectral abnormalities. An explanation must be provided to justify an experimentally derived regression vector that deviates far from bjdeal. [Pg.342]

This is very similar to equation (1). The subscript pis has to be used because the values in B and F are specific for PLS and different form those of other regression methods. There are many ways of calculating the results of equation (4). Theoretical explanations of how T and Bpls can be calculated are found in the literature 53 54 33 56 57 58-59 60 61-62... [Pg.407]

The above model is improved by developing the so-called inner relationship. Because latent (basis) vectors are calculated for both blocks independently, they may have only a weak relation to each other. The inner relation is improved by exchanging the scores, T and U, in an iterative calculation. This allows information from one block to be used to adjust the orientation of the latent vectors in the other block, and vice versa. An explanation of the iterative method is available in the literature [42, 51, 52], Once the complete model is calculated, the above equations can be combined to give a matrix of regression vectors, one for each component in Y ... [Pg.149]

The major conceptual limitation of all regression techniques is that one can only ascertain relationships, but one can never be sure about underlying causal mechanism. The explanation of conclusions with the assistance of other sciences would avoid reaching nonsense conclusions. A hypothetical paradigm can be to use the electronic nose for detecting the adulteration of refined olive oil with refined seed oils when these kinds of oils do not contain volatiles (refined process of vegetable oils includes the deodorization). [Pg.172]

Macquer and Baume s classification of affinities thus introduced a typology of chemical operations, allowing them to expand the discourse of affinity as a general explanatory scheme. Through their classificatory efforts, the notion of affinity became an integral part of chemical explanation. Chemists could simply invoke different kinds of affinity to explain multitudes of chemical operations without further regressing into complicated causal explanations or ontologies. [Pg.211]


See other pages where Explanation regresses is mentioned: [Pg.34]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.931]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.313]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.346 , Pg.352 , Pg.353 , Pg.354 ]




SEARCH



Explanation

© 2024 chempedia.info