Expectation values orbital normalization

The problem has now become how to solve for the set of molecular orbital expansion coefficients, c. . Hartree-Fock theory takes advantage of the variational principle, which says that for the ground state of any antisymmetric normalized function of the electronic coordinates, which we will denote H, then the expectation value for the energy corresponding to E will always be greater than the energy for the exact wave function ... 

One of the goals of Localized Molecular Orbitals (LMO) is to derive MOs which are approximately constant between structurally similar units in different molecules. A set of LMOs may be defined by optimizing the expectation value of an two-electron operator The expectation value depends on the n, parameters in eq. (9.19), i.e. this is again a function optimization problem (Chapter 14). In practice, however, the localization is normally done by performing a series of 2 x 2 orbital rotations, as described in Chapter 13. 

To get some idea of the use of trial wave functions and the variation principle, evaluate the expectation value of the energy using the Hydrogen atom Hamiltonian, and normalized Is orbitals with variable Z. That is, evaluate ... 

The multiconfigurational self-consistent field (MCSCF) method in which the expectation value /is treated variationally and simultaneously made stationary with respect to variations in the Q and Cv,i coefficients subject to the constraints that the spin-orbitals and the full N-electron wavefunction remain normalized ... 

The next step is to find orbitals that minimize the expectation value of /complete in Eq. (13.1), given Eq. (13.3) for Hqm/mm. If we take as our wave function a standard normalized Slater determinant, we have... 

This particular example illustrates what can be shown more formally to be true in general the energy of the wave function is invariant to expressing the wave function using any normalized linear combination of the occupied HF orbitals, as are the expectation values of all other quantum mechanical operators. Since all such choices of hnear combinations of orbitals satisfy the variational criterion, one may legitimately ask why the HF orbitals should be assigned any privileged status of their own as chemical entities. 

Note that the first and second terms on the right-hand side of this equation are simply the spin-orbital Fock operator (in normal-ordered form), and the last two terms are the Hartree-Fock energy (i.e., the Fermi vacuum expectation value of the Hamiltonian). Thus, we may write... 

Neglect of off-diagonal elements leads to that the number operators Na commute with the total hamiltonian and that the bond orders (olor) vanish. It also follows that the expectation values (Nc) assume integer values that equal the normal number of occupied valence spin orbitals in an isolated atom, f.e., Nc) —> Identification with the separated atoms limit and comparison with... 

A number of expectation values cannot be obtained from the density, but require the one-matrix or the two-matrix. To obtain the one-matrix or two-matrix, one has to first define a wave function. Normally, the Slater determinant for the N lowest energy orbitals is nsed, bnt a single Slater determinant cannot possibly be the correct wave function. As has been shown at the end of Chapter 1, the correct one-matrix contains weakly occupied NSOs, because the correct wave function is a snperposition of many Slater determinants. It is unthinkable that the DPT orbitals would give correct results for all expectation valnes, when the nonzero occupation numbers of the one-matrix are incorrectly equal to unity. 

Fig. 12. The radial expectation values, , of the wave functions of each orbital on the Fermi surface. Each value is normalized to the respective Wigner-Seitz atomic radius.

Up until now we have discussed the general methods for computing the cluster wavefunctions we now consider how the wavefunctions can be analyzed to obtain insights into the nature of chemical interactions at surfaces. In the introduction, we pointed out that the most commonly used method of analysis is the Mulliken population analysis and that this method of analysis may give misleading results. One alternative to a population analysis to get information about the charge associated with a given atom is the orbital projection approach. Here, one takes an atomic or molecular orbital, projection operator, P(( ) = spin orbital. The expectation value of P(v>) taken with respect to the cluster wavefunction provides a measure of the extent to which

[Pg.2875]

The energy functional (8.2.2) is simply the expectation value (3.6.10) of the Hamiltonian (3.6.9), as follows from (5.4.20), provided that we now work in terms of spin-orbitals and interpret A and B as p and n respectively. When Wis interpreted as a general vector in Fock space, we must consider a general variation in which P) = U f ), where U must be a unitary operator to preserve normalization. The varied energy is then... 

The steady decrease of 4f radial expectation values along the lanthanide series is often associated with the lanthanide contraction. However, it is a perfectly normal trend that atoms become smaller along a row in the periodic table. As pointed out by Lloyd [1], the relative contraction of ionic radii of+3 cations is larger for the 3d elements (Sc + -Ga +) than the 4f ones (La + - Lu +). Also, what is clearly seen in Figure 3.4 is that the size of the - -3 cations is dictated by the size of 5s and 5p orbitals rather than 4f. When the pioneer geochemist... 

---