Excited states determination

Recently, a symmetry rule for predicting stable molecular shapes has been developed by Pearson Salem and Bartell" . This rule is based on the second-order, or pseudo, Jahn-Teller effect and follows from the earlier work by Bader . According to the symmetry rule, the symmetries of the ground state and the lowest excited state determine which kind of nuclear motion occurs most easily in the ground state of a molecule. Pearson has shown that this approximation is justified in a large variety of inorganic and small organic molecules. 

A restricted Hartree-Fock calculation on a closed-shell n-electron system using a basis set of N orbitals will produce n/2 doubly-occupied molecular orbitals and N—nj2 vacant or virtual orbitals. In a standard Cl calculation, the excited-state determinants are formed by systematically promoting electrons from the occupied orbitals of the ground-state determinant to the vacant or virtual orbitals. The number of configurations which can be formed in this way from N electrons and n basis functions178 is of the order of nN. Thus, even with today s high speed computers, a full Cl is possible only for very small systems. 

A consistent model permitting rationalization and prediction of the solvato-chromic behaviour of coordination compounds with MLCT absorption has been described [428]. According to this qualitative model, the changing relationship between the metal-ligand bond dipolarities in the ground and MLCT excited state determines whether the complex is negatively, positively, or not solvatochromic [428]. For comprehensive reviews on solvent effects on electronic spectra of metal complexes, see references [15, 17]. 

The ADFT/ASCF-DFT scheme has been met with considerable reservation. Thus, ADFT/ASCF-DFT assumes implicitly that a transition can be represented by an excitation involving only two orbitals, an assumption that seems not generally to be satisfied. Also, the variational optimization in ASCF-DFT of the orbitals makes it difficult to ensure orthogonality between different excited state determinants when many transitions are considered, resulting ultimately in a variational collapse. Finally, it has been questioned [110] whether there exists a variational principle for excited states in DFT. In spite of this, some of the first pioneering chemical applications of DFT involved ASCF-DFT calculations on excitation energies [36, 113-116] for transition metal complexes and ASCF-DFT is still widely used [117-121]. 

This may be accomplished by perturbation methods such as Moeller-Plesset (MP) or by including excited state determinants in the wave equation as in configurational interaction (CISD) calculations. The excited states have electrons in different orbitals and reduced electron-electron repulsions. 

In the HF method, the electron correlation is missing. For the post-HF methods, the correlation may be considered in different ways. In the configuration interaction (Cl) treatment, excited state determinants are constructed from the SCF solution, and the total wave function is written as a superposition of these determinants. The coefficients of the determinants in these... 

Abstract This chapter considers the properties of the molecular solute in electronic excited states determined from the linear response functions descriljed in the previous Chap. 3. Transition energies and transition moments are determined from a generalized eigenvalue equations, and the first-order properties in electronic excited states are expressed as analytical gradients of the corresponding tfansition energies with respect to suitable perturbations. 

The density n, of a given excited state determines the Hamiltonian and via adiabatic connection the non-interacting effective potential Therefore we can consider the total energy as a functional of the non-interacting effective potential ... 

---