Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Excited state, formation

The choice of new complexes was guided by some simple considerations. The overall eel efficiency of any compound is the product of the photoluminescence quantum yield and the efficiency of excited state formation. This latter parameter is difficult to evaluate. It may be very small depending on many factors. An irreversible decomposition of the primary redox pair can compete with back electron transfer. This back electron transfer could favor the formation of ground state products even if excited state formation is energy sufficient (13,14,38,39). Taking into account these possibilities we selected complexes which show an intense photoluminescence (0 > 0.01) in order to increase the probability for detection of eel. In addition, the choice of suitable complexes was also based on the expectation that reduction and oxidation would occur in an appropriate potential range. [Pg.160]

FIGURE 4.3 Various processes leading to excited state formation and their inverses. See text for explanation. From Brocklehurst (1970). [Pg.79]

With the advent of picosecond-pulse radiolysis and laser technologies, it has been possible to study geminate-ion recombination (Jonah et al, 1979 Sauer and Jonah, 1980 Tagawa et al 1982a, b) and subsequently electron-ion recombination (Katsumura et al, 1982 Tagawa et al, 1983 Jonah, 1983) in hydrocarbon liquids. Using cyclohexane solutions of 9,10-diphenylanthracene (DPA) and p-terphenyl (PT), Jonah et al. (1979) observed light emission from the first excited state of the solutes, interpreted in terms of solute cation-anion recombination. In the early work of Sauer and Jonah (1980), the kinetics of solute excited state formation was studied in cyclohexane solutions of DPA and PT, and some inconsistency with respect to the solution of the diffusion equation was noted.1... [Pg.295]

Z. R. Grabowski, K. Rotkiewicz, W. Rubaszewska, and E. Kirkor-Kaminska, Spectroscopy and kinetic of the twisted internal charge-transfer (TICT) excited state formation in p-substituted dialkylanilines, Acta Phys. Pol. A 54, 767 (1978). [Pg.143]

The CIEEL mechanism has been utilized to explain the catalyzed decomposition of several cyclic and linear peroxides, including diphenoyl peroxide (4), peroxyesters and 1,2-dioxetanones. Special interest has focused on this mechanism when it was utilized to explain the efficient excited state formation in the chemiexcitation step of the firefly s luciferin/luciferase bio luminescence. However, doubts have been voiced more recently about the validity of this mechanistic scheme, due to divergences about the... [Pg.1213]

The kinetics of CL reactions can most conveniently be followed by measuring the time course of the emission intensity. The emission intensity at any time of the reaction corresponds to the velocity of excited-state formation and therefore to the velocity of the excitation step (electronic transitions and energy transfer processes should certainly be faster than the excitation step ). Therefore, the emission intensity fm) is determined by the rate constant of the excitation step (kex), the concentration of the HEI and, in the case of activated CL, the concentration of the ACT, as well as the < > and the emission quantum yield of the emitting species ([Pg.1221]

However, the most severe criticism of the CIEEL hypothesis relates to the chemiexcita-tion efficiency experimentally obtained for the standard CIEEL systems, diphenoyl peroxide (4) and 1,2-dioxetanone (2) . In a study on the electron transfer catalyzed decomposition of l,4-dimethoxy-9,10-diphenylanthracence peroxide (21), Catalan and Wilson obtained very low chemiexcitation quantum yields with various commonly utilized activators (4>s =2 10 EmoH ) and reinvestigated the CL of diphenoyl peroxide (4), determining quantum yields in the same order of magnitude (4>s = (2 1)10 Emol ) as those obtained by 21 (Table 1). We have more recently determined the quantum yields in the rubrene-catalyzed decomposition of dimethyl-1,2-dioxetanone (9) and also found a much lower value than the one initially reported (Table 1) °. Since the diphenoyl peroxide and the 1,2-dioxetanone systems are the two prototype CIEEL systems, the validity of this hypothesis itself might be questioned due to its low efficiency in excited-state formation. ... [Pg.1235]

Nevertheless, there are two highly efficient CL systems which are believed to involve the CIEEL mechanism in the chemiexcitation step, i.e. the peroxyoxalate reaction and the electron transfer initiated decomposition of properly substituted 1,2-dioxetanes (Table 1)17,26 We have recently confirmed the high quantum yields of the peroxyoxalate system and obtained experimental evidence for the validity of the CIEEL hypothesis as the excitation mechanism in this reaction. The catalyzed decomposition of protected phenoxyl-substituted 1,2-dioxetanes is believed to be initiated by an intramolecular electron transfer, analogously to the intermolecular CIEEL mechanism. Therefore, these two highly efficient systems demonstrate the feasibility of efficient excited-state formation by subsequent electron transfer, chemical transformation (cleavage) and back-electron transfer steps, as proposed in the CIEEL hypothesis. [Pg.1236]

Rauhut and coworkers proposed the occurrence of a charge transfer complex between the HEI and the ACT in order to explain the electronically excited-state generation in the peroxyoxalate system. Chemiluminescence quantum yield (4>cl) measurements with different activators have shown that the lower the ACT half-wave oxidation potential (Ei/2° ) or singlet energy (Es), the higher the electronically excited-state formation rate and 4>cl- According to the mechanistic proposal of Schuster and coworkers for the CIEEL... [Pg.1266]

Thermal Dissociation of the Excited State. Formation of the Solvated Electron—Parent Atom Pair... [Pg.238]

Photochemistry is the branch of chemistry that deals with the causes and courses of chemical deactivation processes of electronically excited particles, usually with the participation of ultraviolet, visible, or near-infrared radiation [1]. The photochemist is interested in both the modes of excited-state formation processes (direct photoexcitation, energy transfer, etc.) and the deactivation pathways of excited atoms, molecules, and ions. [Pg.139]

In this system the strongly oxidizing SO4 can also oxidize [(bpy)3Ru]2+ and subsequent annihilation of the [(bpy)3Ru]3+ with the electrogenerated [(bpy)3Ru]1+ also leads to excited state formation. [Pg.161]


See other pages where Excited state, formation is mentioned: [Pg.160]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.1215]    [Pg.1216]    [Pg.1217]    [Pg.1217]    [Pg.1218]    [Pg.1234]    [Pg.1244]    [Pg.1267]    [Pg.1215]    [Pg.1216]    [Pg.1217]    [Pg.1217]    [Pg.1218]    [Pg.1234]    [Pg.1236]    [Pg.1267]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.727]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.110]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.3 , Pg.4 , Pg.5 , Pg.6 , Pg.7 , Pg.8 , Pg.9 , Pg.10 , Pg.11 , Pg.12 , Pg.13 ]




SEARCH



Electronically excited states, formation

Excited state, formation from dioxetans

Excited state, formation molecular geometry

Excited state, formation potential energy

Excited state, formation spin restrictions

Excited state, formation surfaces

Excited triplet states, formation

Formation and Decay of Excited States

Formation of Excited Triplet States

Formation of electronically excited states

Formation of the Excited State

Mechanism of Excited State Formation from Dioxetans

Mechanisms of Excited State Formation

Photon excited states, formation

Positronium formation into excited states

Ruthenium excited state formation

State formation

© 2024 chempedia.info