Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Excited reduction potentials

The perturbation of the yr-systems of radical anions of R3M substituted naphthalenes, formed by polarographic reduction, is discussed in terms of their ionization potentials, charge transfer excitations, reduction potential, and e.s.r. spin distribution. Base cleavage of arylsilanes is consistent with the formation of the carbanion XCeH4 as the rate determining step. The nature of the Ar—M... [Pg.121]

The estimated excited-state reduction potential E° (Au " ) of 2.2 V (versus NHE) suggests that the excited state of [Au(C N N-dpp)Cl] is a powerful oxidant. [Pg.270]

Oxidative repair is not a unique feature of our Rh(III) complexes. We also demonstrated efficient long-range repair using a covalently tethered naphthalene diimide intercalator (li /0 1.9 V vs NHE) [151]. An intercalated ethidium derivative was ineffective at dimer repair, consistent with the fact that the reduction potential of Et is significantly below the potential of the dimer. Thymine dimer repair by a series of anthraquinone derivatives was also evaluated [151]. Despite the fact that the excited triplets are of sufficient potential to oxidize the thymine dimer ( 3 -/0 1.9 V vs NHE), the anthraquinone derivatives were unable to effect repair [152]. We attribute the lack of repair by these anthraquinone derivatives to their particularly short-lived singlet states anthraquinone derivatives that do not rapidly interconvert to the excited triplet state are indeed effective at thymine dimer repair [151]. These observations suggest that interaction of the dimer with the singlet state may be essential for repair. [Pg.103]

The importance of radical ions and electron-transfer reactions has been pointed out in the preceding sections (see also p. 128). Thus, in linear hydrazide chemiluminescence (p. 103) or acridine aldehyde or ketone chemiluminescence, the excitation steps consist in an electron transfer from a donor of appropriate reduction potential to an acceptor in such a way that the electron first occupies the lowest antibonding orbital, as in the reaction of 9-anthranoyl peroxide 96 with naphthalene radical anion 97 142> ... [Pg.119]

Chemiluminescence also occurs during electrolysis of mixtures of DPACI2 99 and rubrene or perylene In the case of rubrene the chemiluminescence matches the fluorescence of the latter at the reduction potential of rubrene radical anion formation ( — 1.4 V) at —1.9 V, the reduction potential of DPA radical anion, a mixed emission is observed consisting of rubrene and DPA fluorescence. Similar results were obtained with the dibromide 100 and DPA and/or rubrene. An energy-transfer mechanism from excited DPA to rubrene could not be detected under the reaction conditions (see also 154>). There seems to be no explanation yet as to why, in mixtures of halides like DPACI2 and aromatic hydrocarbons, electrogenerated chemiluminescence always stems from that hydrocarbon which is most easily reduced. A great number of aryl and alkyl halides is reported to exhibit this type of rather efficient chemiluminescence 155>. [Pg.122]

Figure L Modified Latimer diagram illustrating the relative reduction potentials of a metal complex (M) and its excited state (M ). Figure L Modified Latimer diagram illustrating the relative reduction potentials of a metal complex (M) and its excited state (M ).
A different view of the OMT process is that the molecule, M, is fully reduced, M , or oxidized, M+, during the tunneling process [25, 26, 92-95]. In this picture a fully relaxed ion is formed in the junction. The absorption of a phonon (the creation of a vibrational excitation) then induces the ion to decay back to the neutral molecule with emission (or absorption) of an electron - which then completes tunneling through the barrier. For simplicity, the reduction case will be discussed in detail however, the oxidation arguments are similar. A transition of the type M + e —> M is conventionally described as formation of an electron affinity level. The most commonly used measure of condensed-phase electron affinity is the halfwave reduction potential measured in non-aqueous solvents, Ey2. Often these values are tabulated relative to the saturated calomel electrode (SCE). In order to correlate OMTS data with electrochemical potentials, we need them referenced to an electron in the vacuum state. That is, we need the potential for the half reaction ... [Pg.204]

The ground state (0 kJ/mol) for the CL molecule is represented by the term symbol 3v . The first excited state (92 kJ/mol above the ground state) is a 1 singlet (electrons spin paired with both electrons in either the n x or the n y level). The 1 v state with paired spin electrons, one each in the 7i v and n y levels, is the next excited level 155 kJ/mol above the ground state. Reduction of 02 by one electron yields the superoxide ion (02), a radical anion. Reduction by two electrons yields the peroxide ion, (02 ). Bond lengths and bond orders for these are given in Table 4.2. As noted in equation 4.2, the reduction potential for 02 in the presence of protons is thermodynamically favorable. Therefore, reversible binding of O2 to a metal can only be achieved if competition with protons and further reduction to superoxide and peroxide are both controlled.8... [Pg.172]

Introduction of electron-accepting hi thieno[3,2-6 2, 3 -e]pyri dine units resulted in copolymer 308 with ca. 0.5 V lower reduction potential compared to the parent homopolymer PFO 195 [398]. Upon excitation at 420 nm (A ax =415 nm), copolymer 308 exhibited blue-green emission with two peaks at 481 and 536 nm. Preliminary EL studies of an ITO/PEDOT/308/A1 device showed two peaks positioned as in the PL spectra. The PLED exhibited low turn-on voltage ( 4 V) but at higher voltages of 6-9 V, a slight increase in the green component was observed (Chart 2.83). [Pg.165]

Rehm-Weller method (21) for estimating the reduction potentials of excited molecules As our homologous series of reductants, we have used the RuL3 +/ RuL32+ couples (22,23), where RuL32+ is the luminescent excited state of Rul 7 The electron exchange rate constants for these couples are very large... [Pg.383]

Excited states are both better oxidising and better reducing agents than their ground states. To a first approximation the oxidation and reduction potentials can be calculated as follows ... [Pg.32]

Emission quenching is also observed with mononucleotides. In that case the quenching efficiency decreases from GMP (guanosine 5 monophosphate) to AMP (adenosine 5 monophosphate) i.e. it also follows the redox potentials of the bases, as G is more easily oxidisable than A, although the oxidation potential valura reported in the literature are rather different from one author to the other [101-104], Moreover the quenching rate constant by GMP in a Kries of different TAP and HAT complexes plotted versus the reduction potential of the excited state (Fig. 12) [95] is consistent with an electron transfer process. Indeed, as will be demonstrated in Sect. 4.3.1, these quenchings (by the mono-and polynucleotides) originate from such processes. [Pg.51]

On the basis of the reduction potential of Rh(phen) (Eo = — 0.75 V/SCE) and of its nn energy (2.75 eV), Rh(phen)3 in the nn state is expected to be a very powerful oxidising agent (with a reduction potential of 2.0 V/SCE [133]), making it a stronger oxidant than the MLCT states of the Ru(II) complexes discussed above. Electron transfer from aromatic amines [134] or di-and tri-methoxybenzenes [135] to excited Rh(III) polypyridyl complexes have indeed been observed. [Pg.61]

The feasibility of electron transfer oxidation is dictated by the thermodynamic potential , of the substrate RH and requires an anode potential or an oxidant to match the value of El. It is essential to choose an oxidant with an one-electron reduction potential sufficient for the desired oxidation and a two-electron reduction potential insufficient for further oxidation of the radical cation. The suitable oxidant may be a metal ion, a stable radical cation, or a typical PET-acceptor in its excited state. The advantage of electrochemically performed oxidation is obvious. [Pg.79]

Table 2 Formation Constants K), Fluorescence Maxima (Xmax), Fluorescence Lifetimes (x), the One-Electron Reduction Potentials (E°ed ) of the Singlet Excited States of Mg(C104)2, Sc(OTf)3 and MesSiOTf Complexes of Aromatic Carbonyl Compounds... Table 2 Formation Constants K), Fluorescence Maxima (Xmax), Fluorescence Lifetimes (x), the One-Electron Reduction Potentials (E°ed ) of the Singlet Excited States of Mg(C104)2, Sc(OTf)3 and MesSiOTf Complexes of Aromatic Carbonyl Compounds...

See other pages where Excited reduction potentials is mentioned: [Pg.71]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.716]    [Pg.722]    [Pg.1069]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.1069]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.582]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.651]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.371 ]




SEARCH



Dyes, excited-state reduction potentials

Excited reductants

Excited-state reduction potential

© 2024 chempedia.info