Excitation functions diagrams

Figure 11.7 Schematic diagram of neutron, fission, and 7-ray widths of a typical nucleus with a neutron binding energy slightly less than 6 MeV. The inset shows the predicted fission excitation function for a nucleus with Bf — Bn = 0.75 MeV together with more recent data.

The fourth-order quadruple-excitation energy diagrams arise from the disconnected wave function diagrams shown in Figure 9. This observation leads to considerable simplification in the evaluation of this energy component. For example, using the identity... 

Figure 9 Connected and disconnected wave function diagrams (a) second-order connected triple-excitation diagram, (b) second-order disconnected quadruple-excitation diagram, (c) third-order disconnected triple-excitation diagram, (d) third-order connected quadruple-excitation diagram...

The triple-excitation fourth-order energy, in contrast to the quadruple-excitation component, arises from connected wave function diagrams. The algorithm required to evaluate this energy component is considerably less tractable than that for the quadruple-excitation energy, depending on 7, where n is the number of basis functions. The triple-excitation diagrams can be written in terms of the intermediates. 

Figure 7.4 Schematic representation of different competing decay processes and their timescales from the electronically excited state. Diagrams in the form of a Jablonski diagram (left) and in the form of a two dimensional potential energy diagram (right) as a function of two nuclear coordinates.

Reed (1966) produced the nomogram of Figure 5.8 for spatial resolution (d) as a function of density, incident electron energy and critical excitation energy. In the diagram, the case for iron (EC = 1A keY, p = 7) gives an estimated value of d at 20 keY of 0.8 pm, so the resolution for quantitative analysis is approximately 2.4 pm. 

Some commercially available detectors have a number of detection modes built into a single unit. Fig. 2.4o is a diagram of the detector used in the Perkin Elmer 3D system, which combines uv absorption, fluorescence and conductivity detection. The uv function is a fixed wavelength (254 nm) detector, and the fluorescence function can monitor emission above 280 nm, based on excitation at 254 nm. The metal inlet and outlet tubes act as the electrodes in the conductance cell. The detection modes can be operated independently or simultaneously, using a multichannel recorder. In the conductivity mode, using NaCl, a linear range of 103 and a noise equivalent concentration of 5 x 10 8 g cm-3 have been obtained. 

In calculations and interaction diagrams, only the most simplistic MO models will be chosen to represent ground and excited states of reactants. An olefin then has a bond framework largely neglected in discussing the reactivity of the molecule. The bonding level will be characterized by a jr-electron wave function with no nodes between the two basis fi orbitals of the ir-bond. The first jr-antibonding level has one node in the wave function, and a first excited state has electron-occupancy of unity in each level. 

Fig. 11.10. Diagram illustrating the inner surfaces of the primary components of a Paul (3D) quadrupole ion trap. Ions generated by an external source are injected into the trap through an aperture in one of the end caps. Scan functions for isolating ions in the trap, exciting the mass selected ions to induce unimolecular dissociation, and ejecting ions from the trap (for detection) are implemented through the application of DC and RF voltages to the ring electrode.

Figure 8. (a) Pulse sequence resulting from optimization of the control field to generate H in the same reaction as studied in Fig. 6. (6) The Husimi transform of the pulse sequence shown in (a). (c) Time dependence of the norms of the ground-state and excited-state populations as a result of application of the pulse sequence shown in (a). Absolute value of the ground-state wave function at 1500 au (37.5 fs) propagated under the pulse sequence shown in (a), shown superposed on a contour diagram of the ground-state potential energy surface. (From D. J. Tannor and Y. Jin, in Mode Selective Chemistry, B. Pullman, J. Jortner, and R. D. Levine, Eds. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991.)...

Figure 3.51 Diagram of the crossing of two excited states of different dipole moments as a result of solvent stabilization. State (a), e.g. a CT state is stabilized below state (b) in highly polar solvents. f(D) is the Onsager polarity function of the solvents shown by arbitrary symbols...

Figure 4.35 Potential energy diagram of the ground and excited states of the cis and trans isomers of an olefin. The energy is shown as a function of the bond angle...

---