ESI complex

In this book we will use the symbol K, for the dissociation constant of the El complex, and aA) for the dissociation constant of the ESI complex (or subsequent species). The reader should note that different authors used different symbols for these dissociation constants. Hence in the enzymology literature one may find the dissociation constant for the El complex symbolized as K Ka, KEi, etc. Likewise the dissociation constant for the ESI complex may be symbolized as aK, K, Kis> and KEsi-... 

As stated earlier, the velocity terms are dependent on the concentration of substrate, relative to KM, used in the activity assay. Likewise in an activity assay the free fraction of enzyme is also in equilibrium with the ES complex, and potentially with an ESI complex, depending on the inhibition modality of the compound. To account for this, we must replace the thermodynamic dissociation constant Kt with the experimental value K-pp. Making this change, and substituting Equations (7.4) and (7.6) into Equation (7.7), we obtain (after canceling the common E T term in the numerator and denominator)... 

Non-competitive inhibitors form inactive ESI complexes so less product is released. Substrate binding is not affected so Km is unaltered but Vmax is reduced. 

O Figure 4-10a shows a reaction scheme for interactions of enzyme and substrate with a full noncompetitive inhibitor. The inhibitor interacts with a site distinct from the active site, and the ESI complex is incapable of yielding product. It is thus possible, at saturating concentrations of inhibitor, to drive all enzymes to a nonproductive form, and so activity can be completely inhibited. Furthermore, the affinity of the inhibitor for the saturable allosteric inhibitory site remains independent of substrate concentration. A Lineweaver-Burk plot (O Figure 4-1 Ob) reveals a common intersection point on the 1/ [ S] axis for the data obtained at different inhibitor concentrations. It can be seen that as inhibitor concentration increases toward infinity, the slope of the Lineweaver-Burk plot increases toward infinity. Thus, a replot of the slopes versus inhibitor concentrations (O Figure 4-lOc) generates a straight line, which intersects the [i] axis at a value equal to —Ki. 

Uncompetitive inhibition results when an inhibitor combines reversibly with ES to yield an inactive ESI complex, ES + I ESI, and K, = [ESI]/[ES][I]. The double-reciprocal equation is then... 

Non-competitive The E or ES complex, other than at the catalytic site. Substrate binding is unaltered, but the ESI complex cannot form products. Inhibition is not reversed by increasing substrate concentration. Km appears unaltered Vmax is decreased proportionately to inhibitor concentration. 

In competitive inhibition, both inhibitor and substrate can bind to enzyme and form two independent complexes. Only ES degrades to products El is considered a dead-end. Because the inhibitor binds, to the active site, the substrate carmot (and vice versa), so there carmot be an ternary ESI complex (Fig. 6.6). 

Because the inhibitor can bind independently of the substrate, an ESI complex can also form. Both ESI and El are dead-ends (Fig. 6.7). 

A classical noncompetitive inhibitor has no effect on substrate binding and vice versa. S and 1 bind reversibly, randomly, and independently at different sites. That is, I binds to E and to ES S binds to E and to El. However, the resulting ESI complex is catalytically inactive. 1 might prevent the proper positioning of the catalytic center. The equilibria are ... 

We can see from the equilibria that, at any inhibitor concentration, an infinitely high substrate concentration cannot drive all the enzyme to the productive ES form. At any [I] a portion of the enzyme will remain as the nonproductive ESI complex. Consequently, we can predict that the Vaiax in the presence of a noncompetitive inhibitor (Vma,) will be less than the V x observed in the absence of inhibitor. The value (measured as the [S] required for 0,5 will be unchanged by a noncompetitive inhibitor... 

For a more complete discussion of the various types of inhibition and feedback systems, including partial and mixed-type systems where the ESI complex is catalytieally active, the student is referred to the author s Eniyme K jnfttcs Behavior and Anotjtii of Rapid Equilibrium and Steady-State Enzyme Systems, Wiley-Inierscience (19751. 

A noncompetitive inhibitor is usually structurally different ft om the substrate. It is assumed to bind at a site on the enzyme molecule that is different from the substrate-binding site thus, there is no competition between inhibitor and substrate, and a ternary enzyme-inhibitor-substrate (ESI) complex forms. Attachment of the inhibitor to the enzyme does not alter the affinity of the enzyme for its substrate (i.e., K , is unaltered) but the ESI complex does not break down to give products. Since the substrate does not compete with the inhibitor for binding sites on the enzyme molecule, increasing the substrate concentration does not overcome the effect of a noncompetitive inhibitor. Thus Vinax is reduced in the presence of such an inhibitor, whereas K is not altered, as the Lineweaver-Burk plot shows (see Figure 8-9). 

In a rather unusual type of reversible inhibition, uncompetitive inhibition, parallel lines are obtained when plots of 1/v against 1/[S] with and without the inhibitor are compared (see Figure 8-9) that is, both K , and V ax are decreased. Uncompetitive inhibition is due to a combination of the inhibitor with the ES complex. It is more common in two-substrate reactions, in which a ternary ESI complex forms after the first substrate has combined with the enzyme. 

In uncompetitive inhibition, the inhibitor binds only to the ES, complex. This enzyme-substrate—inhibitor complex, ESI, does not go on to form any product. Because some unproductive ESI complex will always be present, Vniax be lower in the presence of inhibitor than in its absence (Figure 8.18). The uncompetitive inhibitor lowers that apparent value of This occurs since the inhibitor binds to ES to form ESI, depleting ES. To maintain the equilibrium between E and ES, more S binds to E. Thus, a lower concentration of S is required to form half of the maximal concentration of ES and the apparent value of is reduced. The herbicide glycophosphate, also known as Roundup, is an uncompetitive inhibitor of an enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway for aromatic amino... 

Dissociation constant of the El-complex with release of 1 Dissociation constant of the ESI-complex with release of I Dissociation constant of the ESI-complex with release of S... 

Compared to Eq. (27), the rate equation for non-competitive inhibitor includes another term for the equilibrium of decomposition of the ESI-complex into E, S and I. 

If I acts as a non-competitive inhibitor of the biocatalyst, then the inhibitor acts bybindingnot to the active site but to an allosteric site (i.e., alternative, non-overlapping, non-active-site-binding region) present in both the free biocatalyst and the biocatalyst-substrate complex. The classical non-competitive inhibitor has no direct effect upon substrate binding and vice versa however, the resulting ESI complex is catalytically inactive. Hence, if we repeat the analysis outlined in 8.2.4.1 then the appropriate kinetic scheme becomes as in Scheme 8.3,... 

This results in an apparent decrease in Vmax and an apparent increase in Ks. The rate equation for the formation of product, the dissociation constants for enzyme-substrate (ES and ESI) and enzyme-inhibitor (El and ESI) complexes, and the enzyme mass balance are, respectively. 

In uncompetitive inhibition, the inhitritor binds to the enzyme, but not to its active site, and an ESI complex can be formed. 

---