Entropy differential relationships

Division of equation [9.126] into the constituents must be done with full assurance to maintain influence of different solvents. For this reason, it is necessary to have a few isotherms of equilibrium constant dependencies on permittivity (K=f(e)T). We have developed an equation of a process depicted by scheme [9.45] after approximating each isotherm as InK vs. 1/efunction and by following approximation of these equations fore-1, e-2, e-3...e-j conditions. We then can calculate the integral value of process entropy by differentiating relationship [9.55] versus T, e.g., AG= -RTlnK ... 

A crucial relation to establish involves the differential of the energy, dU. In Chapter 1, entropy was related to energy for a system of one molecule in a heat bath. This is actually a system of constant volume, and the relationship AU = TAS (E was used in Chapter 1 for what we now call U) is equivalent to the differential relationship dlly = TdSy. This tells us that... 

The second law of thermodynamics was actually postulated by Carnot prior to the development of the first law. The original statements made concerning the second law were negative—they said what would not happen. The second law states that heat will not flow, in itself, from cold to hot. While no mathematical relationships come directly from the second law, a set of equations can be developed by adding a few assumptions for use in compressor analysis. For a reversible process, entropy, s, can be defined in differential form as... 

In the linear limit, differentiation of the second entropy, Eq. (19), gives the relationship between the two sets of coefficients. One obtains... 

Partial differentiation of Eqns (4.17a) and (4.17b) with respect to x allows us easily to relate the variation in the preexponential term with the variation in partial molar entropy of MY, and the variation in activation energy with the variation in partial molar enthalpy by the relationships (Fig. 4.5)... 

Extensive theoretical analyses of the compensatory enthalpy-entropy relationship were first carried out by Leffler and later by Leffler and Grunwald, Exner, and Li. The empirical linear relationship between the thermodynamic or activation parameters AH and AS) directly leads to Eq. 11, where the proportional coefficient p, or the slope of the straight line in Figure 9, has a dimension of temperature. Merging Eq. 11 into the differential form of the Gibbs-Helmholtz Eq. 12 gives Eq. 13 ... 

We have seen in Section 1.8 that under suitable conditions the performance of work can be related to a function of state, the energy. The question arises whether a similar option exists for the transfer of heat, again under suitable conditions. The answer is in the affirmative unfortunately, the correspondence is not so easily demonstrated. A fair amount of mathematical groundwork must be laid to establish the link between heat flow and a new function of state. Readers not interested in the mathematical niceties can assume the implication of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, namely that there does exist a function A which converts the inexact differential dQ into an exact differential through the relationship dQ/A — ds, where s is termed the empirical entropy function. The reader can then proceed to Section 1.13, beginning with Eq. (1.13.1), without loss of continuity. 

The dependence of K on temperature plays an important role in establishing the relationship between the relative roles of enthalpy- AH) and entropy (AS) change in the antibody-antigen interaction. This relationship is expressed by the van t Hoff equation (Eq. (9.14)), which is obtained by differentiating Eq. (9.13) (taking into account that AG = AH - TAS) ... 

There are two keys to this generalization, whereby a rational definition for entropy of nonequilibrium states is obtained. First, a more general second law is postulated, based on the property availability. (The availability at any state of a system reflects the extent to which it could affect any other system.) The second key is the introduction of other integrating factors, in addition to temperature, in order to deduce the fundamental differential property relationship (i.e., Gibbs equation.)... 

More extensive and accurate data and additional calculations are necessary to obtain s , e , and from isotherm data over what is required to get the differential energy and entropy from the isosteric equation. The first complete calculation of ss, e and , as well as the differential quantities, has recently been made by Hill, Emmett, and Joyner (95). This paper shows in detail how the methods of this section can be applied in practice. Using heats of immersion, Harkins and Jura (96) made earlier equivalent calculations, but the relationship of their calculated quantities to the thermodynamic functions of the adsorbed molecules was not pointed out until recently by Jura and Hill (92). 

For entropy to be of any practical value, we must be able to relate it to quantities that can be measured experimentally. Here is how we develop this relationship. Since entropy is a state function, we can express it as a mathematical function of two intensive properties. We choose internal energy U, and volume V, and write S = S(U, V). This unusual choice is perfectly permissible.iThe differential of entropy in terms of these independent variables is... 

There is a certain symmetry between these results properties U, H, G, and A, all of which have units of energy, or energy per mass appear as the dependent variables properties P, V, T, and S, appear as independent variables in combinations that involve dP or dV, and dT or dS. Many more such relationships can be obtained. If the differential of dU is solved for dS, we obtain the differential of entropy in terms of U and V ... 

As derived by Wall (46), there is a perfect differential mathematical relationship between the entropy and the retractive force ... 

Since the concentrations will decay monotonically towards their equilibrium values, if possible, it can be asserted that they will also decay monotonically towards a stationary state, when the stationary state is inside the linear domain. This is so, because the inhomogeneous differential equation which describes the approach to the stationary state has (15) as its homogeneous part. As there is only one stationary state of the system corresponding to a given set of fixed forces or fluxes, and this state is a state of minimum entropy production, we have seen that the system in time approaches a state of minimum entropy production. This is sometimes formulated as a direct consequence of the existence of a state of minimum entropy production, but it is clear that in that caise one alwa assumes in addition to the existence of the minimum a relationship between a and d such as (15), since only then do the equations give a temporal description of the system. 

For a second-order transition, we will show the development of two similar relationships, one which results from the volume continuity at the transition and the other from the entropy continuity. In the first instance, we can write that the total differential for the volume in the liquid 1 and the glass g are the same. 

---