Energy inhibitor constant

A review is given of the application of Molecular Dynamics (MD) computer simulation to complex molecular systems. Three topics are treated in particular the computation of free energy from simulations, applied to the prediction of the binding constant of an inhibitor to the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase the use of MD simulations in structural refinements based on two-dimensional high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance data, applied to the lac repressor headpiece the simulation of a hydrated lipid bilayer in atomic detail. The latter shows a rather diffuse structure of the hydrophilic head group layer with considerable local compensation of charge density. 

Comparisons of affinity among different inhibitors for a common enzyme, or among different enzymes for a common inhibitor, are best done in terms of the relative dissociation constants or the related Gibbs free energy of binding. 

As we described in Chapter 3, the binding of reversible inhibitors to enzymes is an equilibrium process that can be defined in terms of the common thermodynamic parameters of dissociation constant and free energy of binding. As with any binding reaction, the dissociation constant can only be measured accurately after equilibrium has been established fully measurements made prior to the full establishment of equilibrium will not reflect the true affinity of the complex. In Appendix 1 we review the basic principles and equations of biochemical kinetics. For reversible binding equilibrium the amount of complex formed over time is given by the equation... 

The results for thrombin show that our previous parametrization of the LIE coefficients holds rather well in this case, provided that a constant term of -2.9 kcal/mol is added. At present it is not clear to us why thrombin would require such a constant term while, e.g., trypsin does not, but this issue is currently under investigation (see also Ref. 47 for a discussion of thrombin versus trypsin). Furthermore, one should note that with our computational procedures and the Gromos87 force field the results for thrombin inhibitors differ from those of Ref. 35 as well as Ref. 43. That is to say, three independent studies involving thrombin inhibitors have arrived at significantly different parametrizations of the LIE equation, that in all cases reproduce the experimental data well. It therefore seems clear that the differences in the computational procedures have a definite effect on the parameters of the binding energy approximation. 

To be consistent the value of E2 should be corrected to constant pressure so that it represents AH for the process involved (flow system studies and static system work with excess inhibitor are essentially constant pressure experiments). Then D < E < D+RT. In the present work a reasonable estimate gives D — E—0J = 57.0 kcal.mole-1. Similarly, D2+D2 should be corrected to 0 °K, giving an estimated value of 59.0 kcal.mole-1. This gives D2 = 2.0 kcal.mole-1. Such corrections are normally within the limits of experimental error, so that experimental values of E are associated directly with dissociation energies, and thermochemical data at 25 °C are used. 

What is the physical meaning of the rate constant of a chemical reaction What is the dimension of the rate constant of a first-(second-) order chemical reaction How does the rate constant depend on the temperature Write the Arrhenius equation. What is called the activation energy What substances are called catalysts and inhibitors ... 

An inhibitor—e.g., an efficient chain breaker—is initially present and its concentration is slowly reduced to a critical level, below which its inhibition becomes unimportant. At constant pressure, then, the induction period, may be given by an Arrhenius expression, r = AeEIRT, where E is the activation energy of the process involving removal of the inhibitor. 

---