Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Energy for MgO

Figure 13.6 S parameters as a function of positron energy for MgO samples that are Au-ion implanted and annealed at -1200 °C for 10 h in Ar + 5% H2 (solid circles) and Ar + 5% 02 (open circles), respectively. Figure 13.6 S parameters as a function of positron energy for MgO samples that are Au-ion implanted and annealed at -1200 °C for 10 h in Ar + 5% H2 (solid circles) and Ar + 5% 02 (open circles), respectively.
These trends are apparent In the values of lattice energy that appear in Table Notice, for example, that the lattice energies of the alkali metal chlorides decrease as the size of the cation increases, and the lattice energies of the sodium halides decrease as the size of the anion increases. Notice also that the lattice energy of MgO is almost four times the lattice energy of LiF. Finally, notice that the lattice energy of Fc2 O3, which contains five ions in its chemical formula, is four times as large as that of FeO, which contains only two ions in its chemical formula. [Pg.551]

It is known that chlorine acts as severe poison for NH3 synthesis [20,21]. Hence recent kinetic studies used chlorine-free Ru precursors like Ru3(CO)i2 [8,22] or Ru(N0)(N03)3 [7]. In addition to chlorine, the presence of sulphur was found to poison Ru catalysts. Fig. 2A demonstrates that both poisons may originate from the Ru precursor. The binding energies for the Cl 2p peak and of the S 2p peak observed for Ru prepared form RUO3 are typical for chloride and sulfide anions, respectively [23]. Ru prepared from Rus(CO)i2 was found to have a significantly higher purity. As shown in fig. 2B, sulphur and chlorine impurities can also originate from the support. The XPS data of MgO with a purity of 98 % reveal the presence... [Pg.320]

In Chapter 1 we discussed the electron affinities of atoms and how they vary with position in the periodic table. It was also mentioned that no atom accepts two electrons with a release of energy. As a result, the only value available for the energy associated with adding a second electron to O- is one calculated by some means. One way in which the energy for this process can be estimated is by making use of a thermochemical cycle such as the one that follows, showing the steps that could lead to the formation of MgO. [Pg.236]

The concept of color centers has been extended to surfaces to explain a number of puzzling aspects of surface reactivity. For example, in oxides such as MgO an anion vacancy carries two effective charges, V(2. These vacancies can trap two electrons to form an F center or one electron to form an F+ center. When the vacancy is located at a surface, the centers are given a subscript s, that is, Fs+ represents a single electron trapped at an anion vacancy on an MgO surface. As the trapping energy for the electrons in such centers is weak, they are available to enhance surface reactions. [Pg.435]

Volume-normalized extinction is plotted in Fig. 11.2 as a function of photon energy for several polydispersions of MgO spheres both scales are logarithmic. For comparison of bulk and small-particle properties the bulk absorption coefficient a = Airk/X is included. Some single-particle features, such as ripple structure, are effaced by the distribution of radii. The information contained in these curves is not assimilated at a glance they require careful study. [Pg.290]

Figures 7 and 8 show that n, in most cases increases slowly with temperature owing to the scatter of results, accurate values for the apparent activation energies of this process are difficult to obtain, but in general they lie between 0 and 5 3 kcal./mole. Table I compares values of n, at around 450° with values of monolayer capacity, expressed as nitrogen atoms per gram calculated from the B.E.T. isotherms for the adsorption of N2 at — 196° on the same oxides the same outgassing temperatures were used in both series of experiments. Table I similarly compares the B.E.T. mono-layer capacities and n, values for MgO subjected to various outgassing... Figures 7 and 8 show that n, in most cases increases slowly with temperature owing to the scatter of results, accurate values for the apparent activation energies of this process are difficult to obtain, but in general they lie between 0 and 5 3 kcal./mole. Table I compares values of n, at around 450° with values of monolayer capacity, expressed as nitrogen atoms per gram calculated from the B.E.T. isotherms for the adsorption of N2 at — 196° on the same oxides the same outgassing temperatures were used in both series of experiments. Table I similarly compares the B.E.T. mono-layer capacities and n, values for MgO subjected to various outgassing...
The data in Table 3.16 may be used to estimate the band gap energy for unstrained wurtzite-structure MgO of E = 6.9 eV and for rocksalt-structure ZnO of Ee — 7.6 eV, with stronger bowing for the rocksalt-structure than for the wurtzite-structure occurrence of the alloys. Theoretical band-structure calculations for ZnO revealed the high-pressure rocksalt-structure phase as... [Pg.117]


See other pages where Energy for MgO is mentioned: [Pg.236]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.1570]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.1570]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.301]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.41 ]




SEARCH



MgO

© 2024 chempedia.info