Energy distribution for

Fig. XVn-24. Site energy distribution for nitrogen adsorbed on Silica SB. (From Ref. 160.) (Reprinted with permission from J. Phys. Chem. Copyright by the American Chemical Society.)...

Fig. XVII-25. Interaction energy distributions for N2 on BN (a) Langmuir b) Langmuir plus lateral interaction (c) van der Waals. (From Ref. 162.)...

Table B2.5.3. Product energy distribution for some IR laser chemical reactions. (E ) is the average relative translational energy of fragments, is the average vibrational and rotational energy of polyatomic fragments, and/ is the fraction of the total product energy appearing as translational energy [109],...

Normalized ion intensities are plotted as a function of retarding voltage. The unlabeled curve gives the observed kinetic energy distribution for reactant zHe and AHe ions shaded and open squares). 

C05-0061. Redraw the graph in Problem 5.17 as a graph of energy distributions for the three gases. 

Similarly, the TOF spectrum of the D-atom product from the mixed sample has also been measured. Figure 8(a) shows the translational energy distribution for the D-atom product from the mixed sample. In order to show the contribution from the D20 photodissociation, Fig. 8(b) also shows the translational energy distribution for the photodissociation of the pure D20 sample converted from the D-atom TOF spectrum using a mass ratio... 

Fig. 15. The product translational energy distributions for the OH + D channel from the HOD photodissociation at 121.6 nm with the photolysis laser polarization parallel as well as perpendicular to the detection direction.

Fig. 38. Typical translational energy distributions for H + D2C = 0, j = 0) —> D + HD(V,j = 2), which were obtained from the measured D-atom TOF spectra, at nine different collision energies.

Fig. 24. Ion image of photofragment (a) m/e = 98, (b) m/e = 18 from photodissociation of d. .-cl liyIboii/ono at 193 nm. The delay times between pump and probe laser pulses are 30 /is and 7 //s. respectively, (c) The translational momentum distributions of m/e = 18 (thin solid line) and 98 (thick solid line), (d) The fragment translational energy distribution for the reaction C6D5C2D5 —> C6D5CD2 + CD3.

Fig. 26. Ion images of phenyl radical obtained from the photodissociation of ethylbenzene at 248 nm at two different delay times (a) 15 ps, (b) 32 ps. (c) Intensity decay of the disk-like image as a function of delay times. A decay rate of 10B s 1 was obtained, (d) The fragment translational energy distribution for the reaction C6HbC2Hb -> C6HbCH2 + CH3.

Fig. 3. Total kinetic energy distribution for O3 — C Ag) + 0(1D2). Also shown at each wavelength is a comb corresponding to each vibrational level with no rotational excitation. The peaks observed in the 305 nm image are due to rotational structure. The small peak at 0.19eV in the 305nm image is due to an ozone hot band .

Extraction of the speed distribution is achieved in an analogous manner by integrating over all angles for each speed. The speed distributions can be further transformed, using the law of conservation of momentum, into total translational energy distributions for the O3 — O2(X3S ) + 0(3Pj) dissociation. 

Fig. 13. The total translational energy distributions for the dissociation of 03 to 0(3Pj) + 02(X%-) at 226, 230, 233, 234, 240 and 266nm. The vibrational levels of the 02(X3S ) fragment are indicated by the combs. The dotted curves represent the uncertainty in the signal intensity arising from counting statistics.

The energy distribution for the commonly used 450-W Hanovia medium-pressure mercury lamp is given in Table 2.5. 

Figure 3. Product energy distributions for the Cl" CHaBr - CICH3 + Br reaction histogram, trajectory result 6 dashed line, experiment 29 and solid line, prediction of OTS/PST. The trajectory results are scaled to match the experimental exothermicity.

Figure 6.8 (a) Translational kinetic energy distribution for an ideal gas (equation 6.3-7) (b) velocity distribution for N2 molecules (equation 6.3-8)... 

Figure 8.19 Energy distribution for a free electron gas at 0 K (shaded) and an elevated temperature (dashed line), T.

In Fig. 6, we report the radius an the mass of the compact star RX J1856.5-3754 inferred by Walter Lattimer (2002) (see also Kaplan et al. 2002) from the fit of the full spectral energy distribution for this isolated radio-quite neutron star , after a revised parallax determination (Kaplan et al. 2002) which implies a distance to the source of 117 12 pc. Comparing the mass-radius box for RX J1856.5-3754 reported in Fig. 6 with the theoretical determination of the MR relation for different equations of state, one concludes that RX J1856.5-3754 could be (see e.g. Fig. 2 in Walter Lattimer, 2002) either an hadronic star or an hybrid or strange star (see also Drake et al. 2002). 

Because the available photon flux and photon energy distribution for the various x-ray sources vary widely, the type of x-ray source utilized in an XRL exposure tool has a significant impact on resist selection. For this reason, it is appropriate to begin a report on resist design with a short summary describing the types of x-ray sources which are currently, or soon to be, available. A comparison... 

---