Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Operator energy difference

As for the Imear response, the transitions occur tlnough the electric-dipole operator and are characterized by the matrix elements hr equation Bl.5.30, the energy denominators involve the energy differences... [Pg.1274]

The introduction of EOMs for energy differences and for operators that connect two states appears first in the nuclear physics literature see for example ... [Pg.2200]

The electron-electron exchange term, Hex In equation (16) it is necessary to consider only He . As has been discussed, the energy difference between T and S states is equal to Je . With a minimal overlap integral due to a relatively large inter-radical separation. Hex can be given by the Dirac exchange operator [equation (18)],... [Pg.69]

Stability theory is the central part of the theory of difference schemes. Recent years have seen a great number of papers dedicated to investigating stability of such schemes. Many works are based on applications of spectral methods and include ineffective results given certain restrictions on the structure of difference operators. For schemes with non-self-adjoint operators the spectral theory guides only the choice of necessary stability conditions, but sufficient conditions and a priori estimates are of no less importance. An energy approach connected with the above definitions of the scheme permits one to carry out an exhaustive stability analysis for operators in a prescribed Hilbert space Hh-... [Pg.780]

In this model, energy balances are set up for the reactor and the separator tube separately, and two equations are obtained. The gas holdup can then be obtained from combining these two equations. Details can be found in Zhang et al. [7]. The comparison between the measured and calculated cross-sectional mean gas holdups is shown in Fig. 5. It can be seen that there is a satisfactory agreement between the experimental and calculated gas holdup in the different operating conditions. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that the energy balance model used in this work can describe the circulation flow behavior in the novle internal-loop airlift reactor proposed in this work. [Pg.524]

The CPA [188], marketed by ThermoMetric AB (Sweden), is frequently used in Europe. It operates on the principle of power compensation, which is based on the supply or withdrawal of heat to and from the reactor, respectively, in order to keep the temperature at the set-point and, thus, to compensate for energy differences (either shortage or surplus). The heat is supplied or withdrawn by means of special (Peltier) elements, which produce a cold or a hot surface area if subjected to an electrical current. An accurate measurement of the heat supply/withdrawal is possible as the heat flow is directly proportional to the current supplied to the Peltier elements. [Pg.121]

The results of the present work are summarized in Figure 10. As far as the initial part of the reaction is concerned, we have found that the associative mechanism is slightly more favored than the dissociative one. However, the small energy difference found between the two mechanisms and the possible effect of the solvent, which has not been included in the present study, precludes formulation of a definitive conclusion on the most effective reaction pathway. Most likely depending on the reaction conditions and the initial reactants the two mechanisms can be operative. In fact, experimental evidence in favor of both the dissociative [37, 38] and associative [41] mechanisms has been provided. [Pg.282]

In Equation 12.11, v is the frequency of incident radiation (cm-1), v o is the frequency corresponding to the energy difference between ground and excited electronic state, the sum is over all excited states, and d0n and d o are the dipole transition moments between the ground and excited state (dno = (n d 0) = / I nd I o dx, the T s are wave functions and d is the dipole moment operator). At low frequency (v -> 0) Equation 12.11 reduces to the static field expression... [Pg.399]


See other pages where Operator energy difference is mentioned: [Pg.162]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.1553]    [Pg.2208]    [Pg.2214]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.869]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.307]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.162 ]




SEARCH



Energy differences

Energy operator

Operator difference

© 2024 chempedia.info