Energy bond charge separation

We have seen that the pure elements may solidify in the form of molecular solids, network solids, or metals. Compounds also may condense to molecular solids, network solids, or metallic solids. In addition, there is a new effect that does not occur with the pure elements. In a pure element the ionization energies of all atoms are identical and electrons are shared equally. In compounds, where the most stable electron distribution need not involve equal sharing, electric dipoles may result. Since two bonded atoms may have different ionization energies, the electrons may spend more time near one of the positive nuclei than near the other. This charge separation may give rise to strong intermolecular forces of a type not found in the pure elements. 

The activation energy for the charge reduction reaction is due to two factors the bond stretching and distortions of the originally near linear complex, so as to achieve the internal proton transfer and the increase of energy due to the Coulombic repulsion between the two charged products, a repulsion that leads to a release of kinetic energy on their separation. 

Keywords Electron Tansfer m Energy Transfer m Through-Bond Coupling m Superexchange m Molecular Wires m Solvent-Mediated Electron Transfer m Electron Transfer in DNA m Charge Separation m Electron Transfer Through H-Bonds... 

Rate constants and Arrhenius parameters for the reaction of Et3Si radicals with various carbonyl compounds are available. Some data are collected in Table 5.2 [49]. The ease of addition of EtsSi radicals was found to decrease in the order 1,4-benzoquinone > cyclic diaryl ketones, benzaldehyde, benzil, perfluoro propionic anhydride > benzophenone alkyl aryl ketone, alkyl aldehyde > oxalate > benzoate, trifluoroacetate, anhydride > cyclic dialkyl ketone > acyclic dialkyl ketone > formate > acetate [49,50]. This order of reactivity was rationalized in terms of bond energy differences, stabilization of the radical formed, polar effects, and steric factors. Thus, a phenyl or acyl group adjacent to the carbonyl will stabilize the radical adduct whereas a perfluoroalkyl or acyloxy group next to the carbonyl moiety will enhance the contribution given by the canonical structure with a charge separation to the transition state (Equation 5.24). 

Spiropyran thermal ring closure is faster in nonpolar solvents than in polar solvents. This would be expected due to the polarity of this zwitterionic form, which will be relatively stabilized in a polar solvent, because a transition state would be expected to be less charge separated if it were cis about the central 3-methine bond. The activation energy for ring closure is typically between 75 and 105 kJ mol depending on the solvent polarity [51]. The reaction is generally reported to be first order [25,51]. 

---