Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Energy barriers viscosity

As the particles in a coUoidal dispersion diffuse, they coUide with one another. In the simplest case, every coUision between two particles results in the formation of one agglomerated particle,ie, there is no energy barrier to agglomeration. Applying Smoluchowski s theory to this system, the half-life, ie, the time for the number of particles to become halved, is expressed as foUows, where Tj is the viscosity of the medium, k Boltzmann s constant T temperature and A/q is the initial number of particles. [Pg.532]

The stabilization of an emulsion iavolves slowiag the destabilization, primarily the flocculation process. This may be achieved ia two principal manners by reduciag the mobiHty of droplets through enhanced viscosity or by inserting an energy barrier between them (see also Dispersants Flocculating agents). [Pg.198]

Fig. 6.4. Energy barrier between occupied and empty molecular sites u activation energy. The applied shear stress t deforms the energy barrier analogous to Eyring s theory of viscosity v activation volume... Fig. 6.4. Energy barrier between occupied and empty molecular sites u activation energy. The applied shear stress t deforms the energy barrier analogous to Eyring s theory of viscosity v activation volume...
Shear enhancement effects in foam formation can be understood through the modified cavity model. Shear force behaves as catalyst to reduce energy barrier to allow a quik path from stable gas cavity to unstable bubble phase. It can be concluded that both shear rate and viscosity contribute to foam nucleation in the continuous foam extrusion process. Therefore, proper die opening and process conditions will help to optimise the foam product. 11 refs. [Pg.106]

An important aspect of magnetic viscosity is its field dependence. For example, S(H) tends to exhibit a maximum near the coercivity. This reflects the close relationship between the energy-barrier distribution and the irreversible part x>n of the susceptibility, and leads to S = x where the viscosity parameter Sv is only weakly field-dependent [5, 133, 159, 167, 169-172],... [Pg.71]

An effect closely related to magnetic viscosity is the dependence of the coercivity on the sweep rate rj = dH/dt Hc is largest for high sweep rates, that is, for fast hysteresis-loop measurements (Fig. 15). Sweep-rate and magnetic-viscosity dynamics have the same origin, but there is a very simple way of deriving a relation for the sweep-rate dependence. Let us assume that the energy barriers exhibit a power-law dependence... [Pg.71]

The energy barriers associated with the tautomerism have been determined from quantum yields and luminescence lifetime measurements <84JST(l 14)329). Table 25 lists the activation energies and solvent viscosity activation energies associated with the tautomer in a variety of alcoholic solvents. The data suggest a correlation between the energy barrier associated with proton transfer and the viscosity of the solvent. [Pg.183]

Although all theoretical approaches discussed in previous sections do refer to a particular molecular model, rather they represent attempts to rationalize experimental kinetic data in terms of mean values of electrical field or ion distribution, energy barrier height, energy change, ion mobility and viscosity of medium, which are all supposed to be closely related to the molecular properties of the ions and solvent molecules involved. However, no direct link to molecular properties has been established within the framework of the models discussed above. [Pg.327]

It is obvious that here is a direct correlation between the energy barrier created by the DLVO theory and the viscosity of the system. Due to the importance of viscosity in ceramic processing, those relations have been studied already. Empirical relations have been derived correlating those two magnitudes with temperature and solids loading dependence for Al203 ... [Pg.75]

The preceding conclusions may be suitably checked upon comparison with PDMS. We send the interested reader to ref. 15 for the choice of the parameters. Unlike the case of PS, a molten polymer sample was also considered, in which case the hydrodynamic interaction was assumed to vanish [i.e., v(q) = 1] because of the hydrodynamic screening exerted by the polymer chains. In view of the apparently low energy barriers to the rotation around SUO chain bonds, we assumed the internal viscosity to be absent, that is. To = O Incidentally, we remark the difference from the case of polystyrene where, in addition to the intrinsic rotation barrier around C-C bonds adjoining tetrahedral-coordinated atoms ( 3 kcal/mol), the side phenyl rings contribute significantly to the rotational hindrance. In Figure 13 the characteristic times ti/2 [13/4 for the melts [115]] are plotted versus Q. [Pg.336]

The rate of nucleation of particles or clusters of size x can be written as the product of the number of clusters of size x and the probability that another molecule gets to the interface by overcoming kinetic barriers which provide an activation energy barrier, Ag. This latter term includes viscosity and diffusion effects of the bulk liquid medium as well as solvent association reactions that deplete monomers. Ifx is the critical size then the nucleation rate, Jx is... [Pg.263]

Protein monolayers can attain very high interfacial viscosities and elasticities. Moore and Eyring (1938) have developed a theory of interfacial viscosity, based on the theory of absolute reaction rates. In this theory, the flow of a molecule in a monolayer is treated as a movement of flow units, normally molecules, from one equilibrium position to another, passing over an intermediate activation energy barrier. The equation for the interfacial viscosity, tjs, which is derived is... [Pg.295]

The Clausius-Clapeyron equation relates pressure with temperature, enthalpy, and volume, and has been used to develop semi-theoretical expressions of vapor pressure ( ). Many properties, including viscosity, can be related to an energy barrier, free volume and temperature. The attempt here is to express viscosity in the form of the Clausius-Clapeyron equation. [Pg.216]

Above the polymer concentration of 707., starts to Increase due to increased friction of rotation or reduced available free volume. The value of Ej increases by a factor of three over the concentration range from 707. to 1007. as shown in Figure 5, whereas the local viscosity measured by Nishijima Increased ten times above 607.. As a result of extensive overlap of polymer chains in this concentration region, the rotational motion of the chromophores is highly restricted and subject to a high energy barrier to be crossed over to the a state. [Pg.141]


See other pages where Energy barriers viscosity is mentioned: [Pg.251]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.1917]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.98]   


SEARCH



Energy barriers

© 2024 chempedia.info