Empirical formulas determination

Empirical formula determination dependent on elemental response factors... 

Accurate mass determination using techniques such as peak matching is a reliable way to obtain the empirical formula. Knowledge of the accurate mass to four or five decimal places (see Table 16.1) allows the elemental composition of the compound to be obtained. Before the use of computer algorithms, empirical formula determination was made with the help of Beynon tables. Currently, data systems propose the most probable empirical composition for a given mass. The types of elements suspected to be in the compound can be input into the algorithm to reduce calculation time. 

Taylor (10) also showed that high resolution was possible with FAB and that it could be applied to ions as large as these vitamins. However, higher resolution at high masses becomes essential, not for empirical formula determination (which for metal containing systems is often done better by a fit to the isotopic abundance patterns), but simply to be sure of resolving nominal masses as the molecules studied get heavier. 

Empirical Formula Determined from Elemental Analysis by Combustion... 

Plan We find the masses of CO2 and H2O by subtracting the masses of the absorbers before the reaction from the masses after. From the mass of CO2, we use the mass fraction of C in CO2 to find the mass of C (see Comment in Sample Problem 3.3). Similarly, we find the mass of H from the mass of H2O. The mass of vitamin C (I.OOO g) minus the sum of the C and H masses gives the mass of O, the third element present. Then, we proceed as in Sample Problem 3.5 calculate numbers of moles using the elements molar masses, construct the empirical formula, determine the whole-number multiple from the given molar mass, and construct the molecular formula. 

From the masses of elements in an unknown compound, the relative amounts (in moles) can be found and the empirical formula determined. If the molar mass is known, the molecular formula can also be determined. Methods such as combustion analysis provide data on the masses of elements in a compound, which can be used to obtain the formula. Because atoms can bond in different arrangements, more than one compound may have the same molecular formula (constitutional isomers). 

These two structures are two different compounds with the same molecular formula. They are called isomers. Elemental analysis cannot distinguish between these isomers, but NMR and MS usually can distinguish isomers. Another example of a more difficult qualitative analysis problem is the case of the simple sugar, erythrose. The empirical formula determined by elemental analysis is CH2O. The molecular formula, C4Hg04, and some of the structure can be obtained from IR, NMR, and MS, but we cannot tell from these techniques which of the two possible isomers shown in Eig. 1.1 is our sample. 

What is ionic mass The ionic mass of an ion takes into account the mass of an electron (0.000548 Da = 0.548 mDa mDa is also referred to as millimass units, mmu) that is removed or added during the formation of the ion (remember that a proton is a hydrogen atom, H isotope, after removal of an electron). This small mass effect is frequently ignored when masses are determined experimentally and compared with calculated values. However, as the accuracy and precision of accurate mass measurements have improved, the mass attributable to an electron has become of relevance to empirical formula determinations. The mass of an electron represents 1 part per million at 500 Da (-0.5 mDa), which is a significant error in miz determinations for instruments designed to obtain mass accuracies at the mDa level or less. 

All fields TOE LC-MS (API) Accurate mass measurement for empirical formula determination... 

Could the empirical formula determined from chemical analysis be used to tell the difference between acetylene, C2H2, and benzene, CeHe ... 

In theory, it should be possible to determine the empirical formula for each compound in the chromatogram from the ratio of the AED response to the individual elements. A lack of plasma stability, incomplete compound destruction, and deviations from linearity of the individual element responses, however, limits the accuracy of such measurements. Accurate formula values for oxygen and nitrogen can be particularly difficult to determine due to entrainment of atmospheric gases into the plasma. In addition, it is not always possible to use a single compound internal standard for quantification with the desired accuracy for the same reasons that affect the accuracy of empirical formula determinations. 

One part of the problem-solving strategy for empirical formula determination is to base the calculation on 100 g of compound. What if you chose a mass other than 100 g Would this work What if you chose to base the calculation on 100 moles of compound Would this work ... 

Q CHECK YOUR WORK Calculating the percentage composition of the compoimd based on the empirical formula determined in the problem reveals a percentage composition of 32.37% Na, 22.58% S, and 45.05% O. These values agree reasonably well with the given percentage composition. 

Unit mass, making identification ambiguous due to multiple structures as source of breakdown mass empirical formula determination can be difficult, spectra and fragmentations must often be interpreted manually full scan data can be acquired (similar to the single quad procedure) by turning off the collision cell. 

A molybdenum complex contains one molybdenum (18.6%) and two iodines (49.2%), as well as carbonyl (CO) and acetonitrile (CH3CN) ligands. The combustion analysis gives C 16.3%, H 1.2% and N 5.4%. Determine the empirical formula. Assuming that the molecular formula is the same as the empirical formula, determine the number of acetonitrile and carbonyl ligands. 

---