Elements ground-state configuration

The procedure that we have been using is called the building-up principle. It can be summarized by two rules. To predict the ground-state configuration of a neutral atom of an element with atomic number Z with its Z electrons ... 

The next atoms of the periodic table are beryllium and boron. You should be able to write the three different representations for the ground-state configurations of these elements. The filling principles are the same as we move to higher atomic numbers. Example shows how to apply these principles to aluminum. 

C08-0088. Use the periodic table to find and list (a) all elements whose ground-state configurations indicate that the 4 5" and 3 d orbitals are nearly equal in energy (b) the elements in the column that has two elements with one valence configuration and two with another valence configuration and (c) a set of elements whose valence configurations indicate that the 6 of and 5 f orbitals are nearly equal in energy. 

C08-0129. No elements have ground-state configurations with electrons in g (/=4) orbitals, but excited states... 

In this simple qualitative consideration we have neglected the interaction with the ground-state configuration AB). Let us for simplicity assume that the overlap between the two subunits is negligible. Although both subunits are equal, we will keep notation A and B for them. The excitation within subunits A and B is labeled by A and B, respectively, and is represented by promoting one electron from the MO a to the MO a and from the MO b to the MO b, respectively. The matrix element between two locally excited configurations is... 

For many years researchers have known that nuclei can be excited into vibrational modes of motion that are not reflection symmetric. The simplest of these asymmetric modes, the octupole vibration, has been charted extensively. Only recently, however, has new evidence suggested that some nuclei have reflection asymmetric, or pear-shaped, ground-state configurations. Although there is disagreement as to whether these nuclei are pear-shaped or pimpled, it is becoming clear that a more detailed mapping of the nuclear surface is necessary to explain both the spectroscopic properties and the masses of heavy elements. 

Table 7-1 shows the ground state configurations for the first 30 elements. In the table, we have used the notation [He], [Ne], and [Ar] to represent the configurations of He, Ne, and Ar e.g., [Ne] represents the configuration ls22s22p6. This notation focuses our attention on the outermost electrons, the so-called valence electrons, which are important in chemical bonding. 

The ground state configuration of lanthanides, 4/" l5d 6s2 or 4/"6s2 does not determine the chemical behaviour of these elements. In forming Ln3+ ions, an / electron is removed. Lanthanides differ from transition elements in that 4/ orbitals are shielded and are not available for reactions. Thus lanthanides resemble more closely alkaline earths and the scandium group than transition elements in their chemistry. 

Table 1. Predictions of the ground-state configurations of Gol danskii [37), Chaikkorskii [38), Taube [39) and Seaborg (5) for elements 121 to 127 and 159 to 168, using the principle of the extrapolation within the periodic table. The main quantum numbers [5g, 6/, Id, 8s) are not shown. This table is taken from Mann [3S)...

The results for the ground-state configurations of all superheavy elements up to 172 and for element 184 are given in Table 2 35, 50, 56—60). In only very few cases are the results different for the two best methods, DF and DFS, but the differences are so small that no final decision can be made. 

Table 2. Atomic ground-state configurations for the neutral elements 103 to 172 and 184 according to Mann (35) and Fricke and Waber 85, 60), using self-consistent Dirac—Fock calculations... 

---