Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Intermolecular interaction element properties

Solid State Properties. Perhaps as a result of the limited intermolecular interactions of these complexes in the solid state, they exhibit few solid-state properties of interest. The dianionic 7a did successfully produce a charge transfer material by mixing it with a solution of the tetrathiafulvalene-based salt (TTF)3(BF4)2. Elemental analysis of the resulting black product gave the formula (TTF)4[7a]3 and the material exhibited a conductivity of 9 x 10 S... [Pg.89]

There is an ill-defined boundary between molecular and polymeric covalent substances. It is often possible to recognise discrete molecules in a solid-state structure, but closer scrutiny may reveal intermolecular attractions which are rather stronger than would be consistent with Van der Waals interactions. For example, in crystalline iodine each I atom has as its nearest neighbour another I atom at a distance of 272 pm, a little longer than the I-I distance in the gas-phase molecule (267 pm). However, each I atom has two next-nearest neighbours at 350 and 397 pm. The Van der Waals radius of the I atom is about 215 pm at 430 pm, the optimum balance is struck between the London attraction between two I atoms and their mutual repulsion, in the absence of any other source of bonding. There is therefore some reason to believe that the intermolecular interaction amounts to a degree of polymerisation, and the structure can be viewed as a two-dimensional layer lattice. The shortest I-I distance between layers is 427 pm, consistent with the Van der Waals radius. Elemental iodine behaves in most respects - in its volatility and solubility, for example - as a molecular solid, but it does exhibit incipient metallic properties. [Pg.101]

Ditellurides, also in the fifth period, seem quite analogous to distibines. Like tetraphenyldistibine (1) the red diphenylditelluride (56) does not associate in the solid state. The closest intermolecular Te---Te contact is 4.255 A, near the van der Waals separation of 4.40 A 61). On the other hand, di(p-methoxyphenyl)ditelluride (57), which has a brown-green metallic luster in the solid, has close intermolecular Te---Te contacts of 3.57 and 3.98 A (62). The ratio Te---Te/Te—Te is 1.32. Just as in the distibines the intermolecular bonding in ditellurides is sensitive to substitution. It is also interesting to note that the intermolecular interaction in ditellurides and dihalogens occurs normal to the metal-metal axis, as well as colinear as in distibines (63). Thus, it is clear that the intermolecular association shown by distibines is a general property of many of the diatomic like compounds of the heavier main group elements. [Pg.94]

Xantheas and co-workers [159,160] have incorporated polarization in a model scheme and have used that to provide a clear basis for the enhancement of water s dipole in ice. A model potential with polarization has been reported for the formaldehyde dimer [161]. It is an example of a carefully crafted potential, which is system-specific because of its application to pure liquid formaldehyde, but which has terms associated with properties and interaction elements as in the above models. As well, some of the earliest rigid-body DQMC work, which was by Sandler et al. [162] on the nitrogen-water cluster, used a potential expressed in terms of interaction elements derived from ab initio calculations with adjustment (morphing). Stone and co-workers have developed interaction potentials for HF clusters [163], water [164], and the CO dimer [165], which involve monomer electrical properties and terms derived from intermolecular perturbation theory treatment. SAPT has been used for constructing potentials that have enabled simulations of molecules in supercritical carbon dioxide [166]. There are, therefore, quite a number of models being put forth wherein electrical analysis and/or properties of the constituents play an essential role, and some where electrical analysis is used to understand property changes as well as the interaction energetics. [Pg.22]

We say that the chirality transfer occurs from a chiral to an achiral molecule if, in presence of the chiral molecule, the achiral one gains a property observable by a chirality-sensitive-method (CSM). The origin of this phenomenon is a symmetry breaking incident induced by intermoleculecular interactions between the two individua which shifts the achiral molecule from the achiral point symmetry group to the chiral one. This means that achiral molecule possessing either a symmetry plane, or symmetry center, or 2/t-fold inversion axis looses one or more such symmetry elements as a result of intermolecular interactions, and thus it falls into a chiral point symmetry group. [Pg.457]

Lately, predictions of the interaction energy of heaviest element molecules with inert surfaces (quartz, silicon nitride, also modified) were made with the use of physisorption models [155, 168-170], These models are based on the principle of intermolecular interactions subdivided into usual types of long-range forces dipole-dipole, dipole-polarizability and van der Waals (dispersion) one. Molecular properties required by those models are then calculated with the use of most accurate relativistic methods. [Pg.176]

This Chapter has outlined several different approaches to the computational determination of solution properties. Two of these address solute-solvent interactions directly, either treating the effects of individual solvent molecules upon the solute explicitly or by means of a reaction field due to a continuum model of the solvent. The other procedures establish correlations between properties of interest and certain features of the solute and/or solvent molecules. There are empirical elements in all of these methods, even the seemingly more rigorous ones, such as the parameters in the molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo intermolecular potentials, Eqs. (16) and (17), or in the continuum model s Gcavitation and Gvdw, Eqs. (40) and (41), etc. [Pg.73]


See other pages where Intermolecular interaction element properties is mentioned: [Pg.16]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.1536]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.350]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.5 , Pg.6 ]




SEARCH



Elements properties

Intermolecular interaction

Intermolecular interaction properties

© 2024 chempedia.info