Electrophilic aromatic substitution conjugating substituents, effect

As a result of these substituent-induced polarizations, the complementary conjugative interactions at each ring site become somewhat imbalanced (so that, e.g., the donor-acceptor interaction from C3—C4 to C5—C(, is 23.1 kcal mol-1, but that in the opposite direction is only 16.4 kcal mol-1). From the polarization pattern in (3.133) one can recognize that excess pi density is accumulated at the ortho (C2, C6) and para (C4) positions, and thus that the reactivity of these sites should increase with respect to electrophilic attack. This is in accord with the well-known o, /(-directing effect of amino substitution in electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions. Although the localized NBO analysis has been carried out for the specific Kckule structure of aniline shown in Fig. 3.40, it is easy to verify that exactly the same physical conclusions are drawn if one starts from the alternative Kekule structure. 

The Hammett equation usually predicts substituent effects with reasonable accuracy, provided the correct choice is made between o and o. a values are based on a system in which there is little change in the degree of conjugation between the substituent and the remainder of the molecule on moving from one side of the transition state to the other. Electrophilic aromatic substitutions pass through a positively charged complex, the Wheland intermediate (I), in which the electronic distribution is different from that of either reactants or products. A generalised sequence is shown in Equation (10). The standard reaction on... 

Aniline and nitrobenzene electrophilic substitution reactivity We briefly consider the effect of pi-donor or pi-acceptor substituents on aromatic conjugation patterns for two representative examples aniline (23) and nitrobenzene (24). The leading NBO interactions between ring and substituent in these species are depicted in Fig. 3.47. 

---