Electronic structure representation electron correlations

An analysis of the stmcture of the electron correlation terms in which the reference was the antisymmetrized products of FCI -RDM elements was reported in [12], The advantage of using correlated lower order matrices for building a high order reference matrix is that in an iterative process the reference is renewed in a natural way at each iteration. However, if the purpose is to analyse the structure of the electron correlation terms in an absolute manner that is, with respect to a fixed reference with no correlation, then the Hartree Fock p-RDM"s are the apropriate references. An important argument supporting this choice is that these p-RDM s are well behaved A-representable matrices and, moreover, (as has been discussed in [15]) the set of 1-, 2-, and 3-Hartree Fock-RDM constitute a solution of the 1 -CSE. 

The purpose of this review is to discuss the main conclusions for the electronic structure of benzenoid aromatic molecules of an approach which is much more general than either MO theory or classical VB theory. In particular, we describe some of the clear theoretical evidence which shows that the n electrons in such molecules are described well in terms of localized, non-orthogonal, singly-occupied orbitals. The characteristic properties of molecules such as benzene arise from a profoundly quantum mechanical phenomenon, namely the mode of coupling of the spins of the n electrons. This simple picture is furnished by spin-coupled theory, which incorporates from the start the most significant effects of electron correlation, but which retains a simple, clear-cut visuality. The spin-coupled representation of these systems is, to all intents and purposes, unaltered by the inclusion of additional electron correlation into the wavefunction. 

Just as in correlated descriptions based on MO theory, it is neither practical nor desirable to include electron correlation for all of the electrons in large systems. In common with other strategies, the orbital space is partitioned into inactive , active and unoccupied or virtual subspaces. Electron correlation is incorporated only for the active space, which corresponds to that part of the electronic structure which interests us most. A convenient representation of a general spin-coupled wavefunction takes the form ... 

As has been described in numerous review articles, approaches based on spin-coupled theory can provide highly visual representations of correlated electronic structure and have made important contributions to the development of ab initio modern valence bond theory. We have chosen in the present account to concentrate on certain recent developments. 

An accurate representation of the electronic structure of atoms and molecules requires the incorporation of the effects of electron correlation, and this process imposes severe computational difficulties. It is, therefore, only natural to investigate the use of new and alternative formulations of the problem. Many-body theory methods offer a wide variety of attractive approaches to the treatment of electron correlation, in part because of their great successes in treating problems in quantum field theory, the statistical mechanics of many-body systems, and the electronic properties of solids. 

In 1993 Glaser and Choy published a full paper on the electron density distributions (at the RHF/6-31G level and including electron correlation at the MP2(full)/ 6-3IG level) in the heterosubstituted systems XN (X = F, HO, H2N) and compared these systems with methanediazonium ion. The results show that the positive charge on the N()ff)-atom is always larger than that on N(a). The N(a)-atom may even carry a negative charge Unconnected structures of electrophile and dinitrogen must be considered for adequate representation of the density distribution in XNi. ... 

In this paper, we examine the electron correlation of one-dimensional and quasi-one-dimensional Hubbard models with two sets of approximate iV-representability conditions. While recent RDM calculations have examined linear [20] as well as 4 x 4 and 6x6 Hubbard lattices [2, 57], there has not been an exploration of ROMs on quasi-one-dimensional Hubbard lattices with a comparison to the one-dimensional Hubbard lattices. How does the electron correlation change as we move from a one-dimensional to a quasi-one-dimensional Hubbard model How are these changes in correlation reflected in the required A -repre-sentability conditions on the 2-RDM One- and two-par-ticle correlation functions are used to compare the electronic structure of the half-filled states of the 1 x 10 and 2x10 lattices with periodic boundary conditions. The degree of correlation captured by approximate A -repre-sentability conditions is probed by examining the one-particle occupations around the Fermi surfaces of both lattices and measuring the entanglement with a size-extensive correlation metric, the Frobenius norm squared of the cumulant part of the 2-RDM [23]. 

Unfortunately, measured vibrational frequencies have some anharmonic component, and the vibrational frequencies computed in the manner above are harmonic. Thus, even the most accurate representation of the molecular structure and force constant will result in the calculated value having a positive deviation from experiment (Pople et al. 1981). Other systematic errors may be included in calculations of vibrational frequencies as well. For instance, Hartree-Fock calculations overestimate the dissociation energy of two atoms due to the fact that no electron correlation is included within the Hartree-Fock method (Hehre et al. 1986 Foresman and Frisch 1996). Basis sets used for frequency calculations are also typically limited (Curtiss et al. 1991) due to the requirements of performing a full energy minimization. Thus, errors due to the harmonic approximation, neglect of electron correlation and the size of the basis set selected can all contribute to discrepancies between experimental and calculated vibrational frequencies. 

The spectral representations above are not computationally efficient, as they would require knowledge of all intermediate excited states. Computationally tractable formulas for the response functions within the various approximate methods are obtained instead through the following steps (1) choose a time-independent reference wavefunction (2) choose a parametrization of its time-development, for instance an exponential parametrization (3) set up the appropriate equations for the time development of the chosen wavefunction parameters (4) solve these equations in orders of the perturbation to obtain the wavefunction (parameters) (5) insert the solutions of these equations into the expectation value expression and obtain the RTFs and (6) identify the excited-state properties from the poles and residues. The computationally tractable formulas for the response functions therefore differ depending on the electronic structure method at hand, and the true spectral representations given above are only valid in the limit of a frill-configuration interaction (FCI) wavefunction. For approximate methods (i.e., where electron correlation is only partially included), matrix equations appear instead of the SOS expressions, for example. 

Before examining the standard models in any detail, we consider in Section 5.2 the representation of the electronic structure of the hydrogen molecule in a variational space of two orbitals. The purpose of this simple exercise is to familiarize ourselves with the way in which electronic states are represented by Slater determinants, with emphasis on the interplay between orbitals and configurations and on the description of electron correlation by means of superpositions of configurations. 

Fig. 3 Structure-photophysical property relationship of coumarin derivatives, (a) Schematic representation of the correlation between electronic effect of substituents at the C-3 and C-7 position and photophysical properties (b) Structure and their emission maxima of various coumarins...

---