18-electron rule and

Postulate a monomeiullic manganese complex rhai obeys the 18-electron rule and contains only the ligands... 

Transition metal (TM) chemistry stands in contrast to this. Many compounds involve metal centres with partially filled d shells, and/or with one or several unpaired electrons. Therefore, it is not always straightforward to predict the orbital occupation pattern of a given stable compound. For intermediates on a reactive pathway, this is an even greater problem. This is also true for organometallic chemistry, despite the fact that many compounds obey the 18-electron rule and have closed-shell singlet ground states. Thus, there are many 16- or even 14-electron intermediates, odd-electron species [1], and polymetallic clusters and complexes for which the spin state is not readily predicted. 

Since polynuclear complexes and cluster compounds are in general rather complicated species, the application of quantitative methods for describing bonding is not only difficult but also impractical. Qualitative approaches and empirical rules often play an important role in treating such cases. We have used the octet rule and bond valence to describe the structure and bonding of boranes and their derivatives (Sections 13.3 and 13.4). Now we use the 18-electron rule and bond valence to discuss the bonding and structure of polynuclear transition-metal complexes and clusters. 

The useful complex (MeCN)2PdCl2 has palladium in the +2 oxidation state because of its tw chlorine atoms and the number of electrons is 8 for the Pd(II) oxidation state and another two eac from the four ligands making 16 in all. This complex does not fulfil the 18-electron rule and reactive. You would have got the same answer if you had counted ten for the palladium, two each fc the nitriles, and one each for the chlorines, but this is not so realistic. 

In the last three decades of the twentieth century, following Walter Hieber s retirement, four aspects of the research on mono- and polynuclear metal carbonyl complexes found particular attention. These were the preparation of highly reduced carbonyl metallate anions, the generation of stable metal carbonyl cations, the matrix isolation of uncharged metal carbonyls obeying or not the 18-electron rule and, last but not least, the giant metal carbonyl clusters. 

Fe2(CO)9 raises a different set of problems. The structure (33) is shown in Fig. 4 (a), and the conventional bonding scheme (2 a) in Fig. 4 (b). A single metal-metal bond is conventionally drawn so as to satisfy the 18-electron rule and to account for the observed diamagnetism, the short iron-iron distance and the acute FeCFe angle. 

All compounds considered in this section conform to the 18 electron rule and are subclassified according to their d configuration. 

Figure 2. Structural diagrams of the PhsP-substituted selcnido-carbonyl iron and ruthenium clusters (carbonyls omitted) along with the appropriate electron counts according to the 18-electron rule and the PSEP theory.t ...

A number of electron counting schemes have been developed to rationalize or even predict the metal framework geometries adopted by metal cores in cluster complexes. The simplest of these is the Effective Atomic Number (E.A.N.) rule which is based on the 18 electron rule , and assumes that each metal uses its five d, three p and one s valence orbitals for bonding, and that all metal-metal bonds are two centre - two electron bonds. Clusters which obey this rule are said to be electron precise . However, often there may be a number of different structures, with the same electron count, which conform to these rules and there is no discrimination... 

---