Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electron microprobes STEM

SIMS (61,64,86), microscopy (65), XPS (56), electron microprobe techniques (14,66), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) (67) and luminescence experiments (68) have been successfully employed to probe and study V mobility and reactivity on a catalyst surface. TEM, STEM and energy dispersive X-ray emission (EDX) measurements have indicated that V interaction with REY-crystals induced vanadate clusters formation (65). Vanadium was also found capable of reacting with rare-earths outside the zeolite cavities to form LaVQ4... [Pg.355]

Figure 17.3.2 Detection limits, sampling depth, and spot size for several surface spectroscopic techniques. XRP (x-ray fluorescence) EMP (electron microprobe) EEL (electron energy loss), SAM (scanning Auger microprobe) STEM (scanning transmission electron microscopy). Other abbreviations in Figure 17.3.1. This figure is meant to provide a graphic summary of the relative capabilities of different methods modem instmments have somewhat better quantitative performance characteristics than the 1986 values given here. [From A. J. Bard, Integrated Chemical Systems, Wiley, New York, 1994, pp. 103, with permission adapted from Texas Instmments Materials Characterizations Capabilities, Texas Instmments, Richardson, TX, 1986, with permission.]... Figure 17.3.2 Detection limits, sampling depth, and spot size for several surface spectroscopic techniques. XRP (x-ray fluorescence) EMP (electron microprobe) EEL (electron energy loss), SAM (scanning Auger microprobe) STEM (scanning transmission electron microscopy). Other abbreviations in Figure 17.3.1. This figure is meant to provide a graphic summary of the relative capabilities of different methods modem instmments have somewhat better quantitative performance characteristics than the 1986 values given here. [From A. J. Bard, Integrated Chemical Systems, Wiley, New York, 1994, pp. 103, with permission adapted from Texas Instmments Materials Characterizations Capabilities, Texas Instmments, Richardson, TX, 1986, with permission.]...
Optical microscopy (OM), polarized light microscopy (PLM), phase contrast microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) are the methods normally used for identification and quantification of the trace amounts of asbestos fibers that are encountered in the environment and lung tissue. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDXS) is used in both SEM and TEM for chemical analysis of individual particles, while selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern analysis in TEM can provide details of the cell unit of individual particles of mass down to 10 g. It helps to differentiate between antigorite and chrysotile. Secondary ion mass spectrometry, laser microprobe mass spectrometry (EMMS), electron probe X-ray microanalysis (EPXMA), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) are also analytical techniques used for asbestos chemical characterization. [Pg.151]

Figure 4.5 The interface between AIN and W in a cofired multilayer ceramic observed (a) with SEM and electron microprobe, which does not indicate interdiffusion, and (b) with STEM and EDX, which does indicate interdiffusion due to its higher resolution. Figure 4.5 The interface between AIN and W in a cofired multilayer ceramic observed (a) with SEM and electron microprobe, which does not indicate interdiffusion, and (b) with STEM and EDX, which does indicate interdiffusion due to its higher resolution.

See other pages where Electron microprobes STEM is mentioned: [Pg.117]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.742]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.1529]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.39]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.209 , Pg.212 ]




SEARCH



Electron microprobe

Microprobe

Microprobes

© 2024 chempedia.info