Electrochemical potentials electrons

While partial conduction currents are driven by the gradients in the respective electrochemical potentials (according to Eq. (3)), the external voltage that we measure is determined by the difference of the electrons electrochemical potentials (/ieon) or Fermi-levels (//(,on/Nm) at both terminals... 

VjUq = V/(q2 -2Vju = -2Vju oc i/cr the local electronic conductivity is determined by the total current divided by the local change of the electrons electrochemical potential and simultaneously by the local variation in stoichiometry (oc = 1/2V//q ). If the conductivity is approximately constant, the electronic conductivity is obtained from the ratio of current density and voltage, which is direcdy obvious from the equivalent circuit. More accurately, the partial conductivity is derived from the slope of the current-voltage relationship. 

Using [4.12] and [4.13], we arrive at the conclusion that the Fermi energy is equal to the electronic electrochemical potential. 

More detailed information is obtained with appropriate probes located along the sample. This technique was extensively used by Casselton 3 on zirconia. It was also applied on several other ma-terials- j A stringent requirement of this technique is the inertness of the surrounding atmosphere. There must be no noticeable electron electrochemical potential gradient between the bulk... 

Furthermore, oxygen potential distribution may change diulng operations. Typical examples are schematically shown in Fig. 18.10. for the oxygen potential (/tCOa)) distribution in relation to electron electrochemical potential... 

Figure 2 Schematic illustrating electron flow through a molecule sandwiched between two gold electrodes. A gradient in the electron electrochemical potential creates the driving force for the transport. The quantum states of the molecule and the coupling of the molecule to the two electrodes determine the conductance properties.

Figure 12. Schematic representation of the density of states N E) in the conduction band and of the definitions of work function chemical potential of electrons //, electrochemical potential of electrons or Fermi level //, surface potential Galvani (or inner) potential tp, Volta (or outer) potential and Fermi energy ] for the catalyst (W) and for the reference electrode (R). The measured potential difference Vw/ is, by definition, the difference in Galvani potentials (p, pi, and // are spatially uniform e4> and cm vary locally on the metal sample surfaces and the potentials vanish, on the average, for the gas-exposed catalyst and reference electrode surfaces. (Reprinted, with permission from Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, from Ref. 4.)...

Figure 13. Schematic representations of the definitions of work function chemical potential of electrons//, electrochemical potential of electrons or Fermi level// = surface...

The chemical potential pi, has been generalized to the electrochemical potential Hj since we will be dealing with phases whose charge may be varied. The problem that now arises is that one desires to deal with individual ionic species and that these are not independently variable. In the present treatment, the difficulty is handled by regarding the electrons of the metallic phase as the dependent component whose amount varies with the addition or removal of charged components in such a way that electroneutrality is preserved. One then writes, for the ith charged species. 

When two dissimilar metals are connected, as illustrated in Fig. V-16, ]here is a momentary flow of electrons from the metal with the smaller work function to the other so that the electrochemical potential of the electrons becomes the same. For the two metals a and /3... 

In these equations the electrostatic potential i might be thought to be the potential at the actual electrodes, the platinum on the left and the silver on the right. However, electrons are not the hypothetical test particles of physics, and the electrostatic potential difference at a junction between two metals is nnmeasurable. Wliat is measurable is the difference in the electrochemical potential p of the electron, which at equilibrium must be the same in any two wires that are in electrical contact. One assumes that the electrochemical potential can be written as the combination of two tenns, a chemical potential minus the electrical potential (- / because of the negative charge on the electron). Wlien two copper wires are connected to the two electrodes, the... 

If two metals with different work functions are placed m contact there will be a flow of electrons from the metal with the lower work function to that with the higher work fimction. This will continue until the electrochemical potentials of the electrons in the two phases are equal. This change gives rise to a measurable potential difference between the two metals, temied the contact potential or Volta potential difference. Clearly... 

Figure Bl.28.9. Energetic sitiration for an n-type semiconductor (a) before and (b) after contact with an electrolyte solution. The electrochemical potentials of the two systems reach equilibrium by electron exchange at the interface. Transfer of electrons from the semiconductor to the electrolyte leads to a positive space charge layer, W. is the potential drop in the space-charge layer.

Practical developers must possess good image discrimination that is, rapid reaction with exposed silver haUde, but slow reaction with unexposed grains. This is possible because the silver of the latent image provides a conducting site where the developer can easily give up its electrons, but requires that the electrochemical potential of the developer be properly poised. For most systems, this means a developer overpotential of between —40 to +50 mV vs the normal hydrogen electrode. 

As shown in equation 12, the chemistry of this developer s oxidation and decomposition has been found to be less simple than first envisioned. One oxidation product, tetramethyl succinic acid (18), is not found under normal circumstances. Instead, the products are the a-hydroxyacid (20) and the a-ketoacid (22). When silver bromide is the oxidant, only the two-electron oxidation and hydrolysis occur to give (20). When silver chloride is the oxidant, a four-electron oxidation can occur to give (22). In model experiments the hydroxyacid was not converted to the keto acid. Therefore, it seemed that the two-electron intermediate triketone hydrate (19) in the presence of a stronger oxidant would reduce more silver, possibly involving a species such as (21) as a likely reactive intermediate. This mechanism was verified experimentally, using a controlled, constant electrochemical potential. At potentials like that of silver chloride, four electrons were used at lower potentials only two were used (104). 

At open-circuit, the current in the cell is 2ero, and species in adjoining phases are in equilibrium. Eor example, the electrochemical potential of electrons in phases d and P are identical. Furthermore, the two electrochemical reactions are equilibrated. Thus,... 

The applied voltage determines the difference in the electrochemical potential of the electrons or the ratio of the concentrations of the electronic species on both sides of the electrolyte ... 

Figure 5.7. Schematic representation of the definitions of work function O, chemical potential of electrons i, electrochemical potential of electrons or Fermi level p = EF, surface potential %, Galvani (or inner) potential

As already noted the electrochemical potential of electrons in a metal, jl, is related to the Galvani potential q> via ... 

Figure 5.17. Schematic representation of a metal crystallite deposited on YSZ and of the changes induced in its electronic properties upon polarizing the catalyst-solid electrolyte interface and changing the Fermi level (or electrochemical potential of electrons) from an initial value p to a new value p -eri30 31 Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Science.

---