Electron density, aromatic ring

The orbital and resonance models for bonding in arylamines are simply alternative ways of describing the same phenomenon Delocalization of the nitrogen lone pair decreases the electron density at nitrogen while increasing it m the rr system of the aro matic ring We ve already seen one chemical consequence of this m the high level of reactivity of aniline m electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions (Section 12 12) Other ways m which electron delocalization affects the properties of arylamines are described m later sections of this chapter... 

Arylamines contain two functional groups the amine group and the aromatic ring they are difunctional compounds The reactivity of the amine group is affected by its aryl substituent and the reactivity of the ring is affected by its amine substituent The same electron delocalization that reduces the basicity and the nucleophilicity of an arylamme nitrogen increases the electron density in the aromatic ring and makes arylamines extremely reactive toward electrophilic aromatic substitution... 

Although a hydroxyl group strongly activates an aromatic ring toward electrophilic attack an oxyanion substituent is an even more powerful activator Electron delocaliza tion m phenoxide anion leads to increased electron density at the positions ortho and para to oxygen... 

Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution. The Tt-excessive character of the pyrrole ring makes the indole ring susceptible to electrophilic attack. The reactivity is greater at the 3-position than at the 2-position. This reactivity pattern is suggested both by electron density distributions calculated by molecular orbital methods and by the relative energies of the intermediates for electrophilic substitution, as represented by the protonated stmctures (7a) and (7b). Stmcture (7b) is more favorable than (7a) because it retains the ben2enoid character of the carbocycHc ring (12). 

The unshared pairs of electrons on hydroxyl oxygens seek electron deficient centers. Alkylphenols tend to be less nucleophiUc than aUphatic alcohols as a direct result of the attraction of the electron density by the aromatic nucleus. The reactivity of the hydroxyl group can be enhanced in spite of the attraction of the ring current by use of a basic catalyst which removes the acidic proton from the hydroxyl group leaving the more nucleophiUc alkylphenoxide. 

The aromatic nucleus of alkylphenols can undergo a variety of aromatic electrophiUc substitutions. Electron density from the hydroxyl group is fed iato the ring. Besides activating the aromatic nucleus, the hydroxyl group controls the orientation of the incoming electrophile. 

The aromatic ring has high electron density. As a result of this electron density, toluene behaves as a base, not only in aromatic ring substitution reactions but also in the formation of charge-transfer (tt) complexes and in the formation of complexes with super acids. In this regard, toluene is intermediate in reactivity between benzene and the xylenes, as illustrated in Table 2. 

As discussed in the theoretical section (4.04.1.2.1), electrophilic attack on pyrazoles takes place at C-4 in accordance with localization energies and tt-electron densities. Attack in other positions is extremely rare. This fact, added to the deactivating effect of the substituent introduced in the 4-position, explains why further electrophilic substitution is generally never observed. Indazole reacts at C-3, and reactions taking place on the fused ring will be discussed in Section 4.04.2.3.2(i). Reaction on the phenyl ring of C- and A-phenyl-pyrazoles will be discussed in Sections 4.04.2.3.3(ii) and 4.04.2.3.10(i), respectively. The behaviour of pyrazolones is quite different owing to the existence of a non-aromatic tautomer. 

Representative chemical shifts from the large amount of available data on isothiazoles are included in Table 4. The chemical shifts of the ring hydrogens depend on electron density, ring currents and substituent anisotropies, and substituent effects can usually be predicted, at least qualitatively, by comparison with other aromatic systems. The resonance of H(5) is usually at a lower field than that of H(3) but in some cases this order is reversed. As is discussed later (Section 4.17.3.4) the chemical shift of H(5) is more sensitive to substitution in the 4-position than is that of H(3), and it is also worth noting that the resonance of H(5) is shifted downfield (typically 0.5 p.p.m.) when DMSO is used as solvent, a reflection of the ability of this hydrogen atom to interact with proton acceptors. This matter is discussed again in Section 4.17.3.7. 

Ph3C BF, CH2CI2 or CH3CN, H2O. In this case the reaction with DDQ failed to go to completion. This was attributed to the reduced electron density on the aromatic ring because of its attachment at the more electron-poor anomeric center. 

This group decreases the electron density on the aromatic ring and thus inhibits solvolysis of the tertiary alcohol i and the derived acetate ii. ... 

In this mechanism, a complexation of the electrophile with the 7t-electron system of the aromatic ring is the first step. This species, called the 7t-complex, m or ms not be involved directly in the substitution mechanism. 7t-Complex formation is, in general, rapidly reversible, and in many cases the equilibrium constant is small. The 7t-complex is a donor-acceptor type complex, with the n electrons of the aromatic ring donating electron density to the electrophile. No position selectivity is associated with the 7t-complex. 

---