Electrolytes reactive barriers

Electrolytic reactive barriers (also known as e barriers) consist of closely spaced permeable electrodes installed in a trench perpendicular to the direction of ground-water flow intercepts a groundwater contaminant plume, similar to PRBs. Rgure... 

Figure 1.2. Schematic of the implementation of the electrolytic reactive barrier system (Sale, Petersen, and Gilbert, 2005). The barrier is installed perpendicular to the flow of groundwater direction and low electric current is applied to induce oxidation and reduction of contaminants at the electrodes.

In the case of iron, and of other less noble metals, the reductive hydrodehalogena-tion of the substrates via metal dissolution has received much attention, especially for on-site remediation processes (e.g. reactive barriers). Although the dehalogena-tion is based on a corrosion process, rather than on an electrolytic process, the flourishing literature of the past few years prompted us to provide a selection of the bibliographic references (Boronina et al. 1995 Warren et al. 1995 Roberts et al. 1996 Farrell et al. 2000 Alonso et al. 2002 Kluyev et al. 2002 Dombek et al. 2004 Lowry and Johnson 2004 Mishra and Farrell 2005 Moglie et al. 2006 Laine et al. 2007). 

Despite the relatively good results found in literature for soil contaminated with TCE, the removal and elimination of COCs requires enhanced electrokinetic technologies. They comprise the use of solubilizing agents such as cosolvents, surfactants, or cyclodextrins. The other possible alternative for the removal of COCs from soil implies the combination of electrokinetic with other remediation techniques such as chemical and electrochemical oxidation/reduction, permeable reactive barriers, electrolytic barriers, and electric heating. 

As an example of the complexity of nearest-neighbor types that could influence the energy barrier calculations in step 3 of the algorithm, there would be two metal atom types for a binary alloy (three in the case of a ternary alloy) and up to four electrolyte components. For example, for a simple NaCl solution, there would be H2O molecules, Na" and d ions, and cations of the most reactive alloy component—assuming that the noble alloy components do not dissolve. The alloy components are designated as MN or LN in the case of binary alloys. See Figure 4.5 for an example simulation ceU. 

There are several barriers on the road to successful implementation of redox shuttles in lithium-ion cells e.g., several suitable redox couples work only at high charging voltages, and this means that they actually do not respond to heat generation in batteries. Very few stable redox shuttles for high voltage cathodes have been reported so far, presumably due to their high reactivity. Eventually, the majority of redox shuttle additives fail, presumably due to decomposition of their radical cation forms. Increased electron deficiency makes radical cations more susceptible to nucleophilic attack, which may result in reactions with electrolyte components. 

The poisoning effect of Cr species on the electrolyte and the cathode such as LSM and LSCF has been well established [42]. To address the factors related to (vi) and (vii), materials containing elements such as Cr and Si should not be used unless a barrier coating is applied to immobilize these species [43]. Due to its reactivity and its mobility/volatility [44], the use of Ag should be avoided. In summary, new materials need to be evaluated for their susceptibility to attack by impurities and contaminants. 

---