Electric charge and -potential

Fig. 5.5 Distribution of electrical charges and potentials in a double layer according to (a) Gouy-Chapman model and (b) Stern model, where /q and are surface and Stern potentials, respectively, and d is the thickness of the Stern layer...

The next step is to determine the electrical charge and potential distribution in this diffuse region. This is done by using relevant electrostatic and statistical mechanical theories. For a charged planar surface, this problem was solved by Gouy (in 1910) and Chapman (in 1913) by solving the Poisson-Boltzmann equation, the so called Gouy-Chapman (G-C) model. 

Simultaneously, with the application of the latest experimental techniques, some new theoretical models of edl were constructed. They describe the electric charge and potential distribution in the interfacial region and fit to the experimental data. The new models replace the old classic ones that could not predict some observed parameters from measured ones. Some models, characteristic for metal oxide-electrolyte solution were constructed a porous layer model, then a site binding model and its successive version. 

The characterization and control of electrostatic forces are of particular interest. Electrostatic forces depend on the electric charge and potential at the particle surfaces. When subjected to a uniform, unidirectional electric field E. charged colloidal particles accelerate until the electric body force balances the hydrodynamic drag force, so that the particles move at a constant average velocity v. This motion is known as electrophoresis, and v is the electrophoretic velocity. 

The particular importance of surface effects in hydrogen adsorption and absorption by metals, for getters, permanent magnets, in catalytic reactions, battery electrode reaction, H embrittlement and plasma-waU interaction in fusion stems from two facts The first relates to the surface itself The sharp discontinuity of matter with electric charges and potentials of electrons and atom cores at the surface together with the loss of periodicity in the direction orthogonal to the surface leads to... 

II. DISTRIBUTION OF THE ELECTRIC CHARGE AND POTENTIAL IN THE ELECTRO-CHEMICAL DOUBLE LAYER... 

In Chapter 10, electrokinetic phenomena are discussed. Electrokinetic phenomena are relatively easily accessible by experiments and they are usually studied to derive information on the electric charge and potential at interfaces. 

A detailed physicochemical model of the micelle-monomer equilibria was proposed [136], which is based on a full system of equations that express (1) chemical equilibria between micelles and monomers, (2) mass balances with respect to each component, and (3) the mechanical balance equation by Mitchell and Ninham [137], which states that the electrostatic repulsion between the headgroups of the ionic surfactant is counterbalanced by attractive forces between the surfactant molecules in the micelle. Because of this balance between repulsion and attraction, the equilibrium micelles are in tension free state (relative to the surface of charges), like the phospholipid bilayers [136,138]. The model is applicable to ionic and nonionic surfactants and to their mixtures and agrees very well with the experiment. It predicts various properties of single-component and mixed micellar solutions, such as the compositions of the monomers and the micelles, concentration of counterions, micelle aggregation number, surface electric charge and potential, effect of added salt on the CMC of ionic surfactant solutions, electrolytic conductivity of micellar solutions, etc. [136,139]. 

The key to any approach is knowing the electrical charge and potential on the surface of the mineral particle in an aqueous suspension. The following four phenomena contribute to the development of the surface charge specific adsorption of surface-active ions preferential dissolution of lattice ions dissociative adsorption of water molecules isomorphous substitution of ions comprising the mineral lattice (Fuerstenau and Herrera-Urbina, 1989). 

Barber J (1980) Membrane surface electric charges and potentials in relation to photosynthesis, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 594, 253-308. 

The predicted state of the sorbing surface in the two calculations differs considerably. At pH 4, the surface carries a positive surface charge and potential. The electrical charge arises largely lfom the predominance of the protonated surface species > (w)FeOH, which occupies about two thirds of the weakly binding sites. At pH 8, however, the surface charge and potential nearly vanish because of the predominance of the uncomplexed species >(w)FeOH, which is electrically neutral. 

Fig. Id represents the ionic changes and reversal of polarity of the membrane when the nerve is stimulated. Na+ ions enter the membrane ahead of the electrical charge and K+ ions pass out at the peak of the potential reversal.1 Fig. le shows how the ionic interchange is related to the action potential (or magnitude of polarity change). It must be stressed that the actual percentage changes of concentration are very small indeed. The exact nature of the restoration of the original concentration of ions is not completely known. Obviously a source of energy is required, and this is considered to be derived from the metabolism of the cell.

Plaza, R.C.,Gonzalez-Caballero, F. Delgado, A.V. (2001) Electrical surface charge and potential of hematite/yttrium oxide core-shell coated colloidal particles. Coll. Polymer Sci. 279 1206-1211... 

The evolution of KNN has produced methods based on potential functions, where each object is considered as an electric charge and the potential at a point is the sum of each individual contribution. 

The purpose of this chapter is to introduce the basic ideas concerning electrical double layers and to develop equations for the distribution of charges and potentials in the double layers. We also develop expressions for the potential energies and forces that result from the overlap of double layers of different surfaces and the implication of these to colloid stability. 

The electrical current that flows through the external circuit of an electrochemical cell is a measure of the flux of electrical charge and hence the flux of material transformed in electrochemical reactions. The current measures the rate of reaction which is controlled by the electrical potential difference at the interface. 

What are the SI units of electrical potential, electric charge, and energy How are they related ... 

Fig. 6.21 Profiles of charge, electric field, and potential distribution through the gate of an ion-sensitive field-effect transistor (ISFET)...

Shafer, M.R., Baker, D.W., and Benson, K.R., Electric currents and potentials resulting from the flow of charged liquid hydrocarbons through short pipes, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards-C. Engineering and Instrumentation. 69C, No. 4, 307-317, 1965. 

---