Effective thermal conductivity, inside catalyst

Treatment of thermal conductivity inside the catalyst can be done similarly to that for pore diffusion. The major difference is that while diffusion can occur in the pore volume only, heat can be conducted in both the fluid and solid phases. For strongly exothermic reactions and catalysts with poor heat conductivity, the internal overheating of the catalyst is a possibility. This can result in an effectiveness factor larger than unity. 

When a fast reaction is highly exothermic or endothermic and, additionally, the effective thermal conductivity of the catalyst is poor, then significant temperature gradients across the pellet are likely to occur. In this case the mass balance (eq 32) and the enthalpy balance (eq 33) must be simultaneously solved using the corresponding boundary conditions (eqs 34-37), to obtain the concentration profile of the reactant and the temperature profile inside the catalyst pellet. The exponential dependence of the reaction rate on the temperature thereby imposes a nonlinear character on the differential equations which rules out an exact analytical treatment. Approximate analytical solutions [83, 99] as well as numerical solutions [13, 100, 110] of eqs 32-37 have been reported by various authors. 

In the general case where the active material is dispersed through the pellet and the catalyst is porous, internal diffusion of the species within the pores of the pellet must be included. In fact, for many cases diffusion through catalyst pores represents the main resistance to mass transfer. Therefore, the concentration and temperature profiles inside the catalyst particles are usually not flat and the reaction rates in the solid phase are not constant. As there is a continuous variation in concentration and temperature inside the pellet, differential conservation equations are required to describe the concentration and temperature profiles. These profiles are used with intrinsic rate equations to integrate through the pellet and to obtain the overall rate of reaction for the pellet. The differential equations for the catalyst pellet are two point boundary value differential equations and besides the intrinsic kinetics they require the effective diffusivity and thermal conductivity of the porous pellet. 

Catalyst supports such as silica and alumina have low thermal conductivities so that temperature gradients within catalyst particles are likely in all but the finely ground powders used for infrinsic kinetic studies. There may also be a film resisfance fo heaf fransfer af fhe exfemal surface of the catalyst. Thus the internal temperatures in a catalyst pellet may be substantially different than the bulk gas temperature. The definition of the effectiveness factor, Equation 10.23, is unchanged, but an exothermic reaction can have reaction rates inside the pellet that are higher than would be predicted using the bulk gas temperature. In the absence of a diffusion limitation, rj > 1 would be expected for an exothermic reaction. (The case > 1 is also possible for some isothermal reactions with weird kinetics.) Mass transfer limitations may have a larger... 

The first boundary condition follows from symmetrical reasons. In practice, the effective heat conductivity of the catalyst, Tie, is often so high that the temperature gradients inside the particle are minor. On the other hand, there often emerges a temperature gradient in the fluid film around the catalyst particle, since the thermal conduction of the fluid is limited. The energy balance of the fluid film is reduced to... 

We now consider situations in which the catalyst particle is not isothermal. Given an exothermic reaction, for example, if the particle s thermal conductivity is not large compared to the rate of heat release due to chemical reaction, the temperature rises inside the particle. We wish to explore the effects of this temperature rise on the catalyst performance. We have already written the general mass and energy balances for the catalyst particle in Section 7.3. Consider the single-reaction case, in which we have Ra = and Equations 7.14 and 7.15 reduce to... 

---