Effective Hamiltonian formalism approach

This expression has a formal character and has to be complemented with a prescription for its evaluation. A priori, we can vary the values of the fields independently at each point in space and then we deal with uncountably many degrees of freedom in the system, in contrast with the usual statistical thermodynamics as seen above. Another difference with the standard statistical mechanics is that the effective Hamiltonian has to be created from the basic phenomena that we want to investigate. However, a description in terms of fields seems quite natural since the average of fields gives us the actual distributions of particles at the interface, which are precisely the quantities that we want to calculate. In a field-theoretical approach we are closer to the problem under consideration than in the standard approach and then we may expect that a simple Hamiltonian is sufficient to retain the main features of the charged interface. A priori, we have no insurance that it... 

To this point, the formalism has been quite general, and from here we could proceed to derive any one of several single-site approximations (such as the ATA, for example). However, we wish to focus on the desired approach, the CPA. To do so, we recall that our aim is to produce a (translationally invariant) effective Hamiltonian He, which reflects the properties of the exact Hamiltonian H (6.2) as closely as possible. With that in mind, we notice that the closer the choice of unperturbed Hamiltonian Ho (6.4) is to He, then the smaller are the effects of the perturbation term in (6.7), and hence in (6.10). Clearly, then, the optimal choice for H0 is He. Thus, we have... 

The theoretical approach will take use of these operators. The effective Hamiltonian will be described for a single site, site v, but for simplicity the formalism omits the index v unless it is absolutely necessary as the expressions are equivalent for all sites in the N-site jump process. For a system including both CSA-and quadrupolar interactions, the effective Hamiltonian for a single site during a pulse is... 

The potential energy surface used in solution, G (R), is related to an effective Hamiltonian containing a solute-solvent interaction term, Vint- In the implementation of the EH-CSD model, that will be examined in Section 6, use is made of the equilibrium solute-solvent potential. There are good reasons to do so however, when the attention is shifted to a dynamical problem, we have to be careful in the definition of Vint - This operator may be formally related to a response function TZ which depends on time. For simplicity s sake, we may replace here TZ with the polarization vector P, which actually is the most important component of TZ (another important contribution is related to Gdis) For the calculation of Gei (see eq.7), we resort to a static value, while for dynamic calculations we have to use a P(t) function quantum electrodynamics offers the theoretical framework for the calculation of P as well as of TZ. The strict quantum electrodynamical approach is not practical, hence one usually resorts to simple naive models. 

Hynes formulation is intuitively very appealing, but there are some drawbacks. The environment is described by a 1-D coordinate and the promoting vibration is an artifact that was introduced to modulate the tunneling splitting. In a series of papers on gas-phase proton transfer,19 21 Benderskii had examined the same effect, tunneling rate modulated by fluctuations of transfer distance, using a Hamiltonian formalism. We will briefly summarize his approach. 

H was the matrix-component of the Hiickel effective-Hamiltonian operator, effective between two basis atomic-orbitals, 4>r and 4>s, Srs was the overlap integral between 4>r and s, and H was set equal to a, H to / . This is how we developed the simple HMO-approach in Chapter Two. What Roothaan did was to show that a formally similar determinant is obtained in a full treatment of the re-electrons, but that it involves a somewhat more complicated expression for the matrix-elements, H . Furthermore, he showed that this more-complicated expression somehow had to take into account interactions between any one re-electron and all the other re-electrons. We do not go into the details of this here, except to say that, in order to find the LCAO-MO coefficients for one molecular orbital, it is necessary to know all the others, because all the others appear in the expressions for the equivalent terms, Hrs. This is a very familiar situation which mathematicians have long known how to deal with and which we encountered during our discussion of the self-consistent" Huckel-methods in 7.2—7.5 it is necessary to use an iterative scheme. An initial guess is made of all the orbitals except one and these are used to calculate the H -terms for the one orbital which has not yet... 

It would be interesting to establish the possible relationships between the Bloch formalism for constructing effective Hamiltonians and other perturbative approaches, including Van Vleck perturbation theory (161). 

It is interesting to note that the intruder state problem, which appeared explicitly in the effective Hamiltonian approach, is also present in pseudo-Hamiltonian formalisms when the simulation is too ambitious and claims to concern some states strongly mixed with other states out of the model. 

Abstract We present an approach based on the quadratic vibronic coupling (QVC) Hamiltonian [NewJ Chem 17 7-29,1993] and the effective-mode formalism [Phys Rev Lett 94 113003, 2005] for the short-time dynamics through conical intersections in complex molecular systems. Within this scheme the nuclear degrees of freedom of the whole system are split as system modes and as environment modes. To describe the short-time dynamics in the macrosystem precisely, only three effective environmental modes together with the system s modes are needed. 

---