Dominant Partner Effect

Within the parent coal-extract solution the minor component of smaller molecules extends a "dominant partner effect" (21) by providing the necessary physical fluidity of the system and possibly some chemical stability (see below, on Hydrogen Transfer Reactions),... 

The first approach includes catalytic (13-17) and pressurized carbonization (23-25) Catalysts may be used to create naphthenic structure in the condensation reaction. Heating rate is another important factor (26) The authors have also emphasized the importance of cocarbonization carbonization reactions tend to be governed by minor components (Figure 4). Marsh et al. (27) defined such a situation as the "dominant partner effect" By a suitable additive, the carbonization reaction can be modified to produce a desired optical texture. The aromaticity and hydrogen-donating ability of the additive are recognized to be important for the modifying ability of the additive (28-30). 

Extreme cases were reactions of the least stabilized, most reactive carbene (Y = CF3, X = Br) with the more reactive alkene (CH3)2C=C(CH3)2, and the most stabilized, least reactive carbene (Y = CH3O, X = F) with the less reactive alkene (1-hexene). The rate constants, as measured by LFP, were 1.7 x 10 and 5.0 X lO M s, respectively, spanning an interval of 34,000. In agreement with Houk s ideas,the reactions were entropy dominated (A5 —22 to —29e.u.). The AG barriers were 5.0 kcal/mol for the faster reaction and 11 kcal/ mol for the slower reaction, mainly because of entropic contributions the AH components were only —1.6 and +2.5 kcal/mol, respectively. Despite the dominance of entropy in these reactive carbene addition reactions, a kind of de facto enthalpic control operates. The entropies of activation are all very similar, so that in any comparison of the reactivities of alkene pairs (i.e., ferei)> the rate constant ratios reflect differences in AA//t, which ultimately appear in AAG. Thus, car-benic philicity, which is the pattern created by carbenic reactivity, behaves in accord with our qualitative ideas about structure-reactivity relations, as modulated by substiment effects in both the carbene and alkene partners of the addition reactions. " Finally, volumes of activation were measured for the additions of CgHsCCl to (CH3)2C=C(CH3)2 and frani-pentene in both methylcyclohexane and acetonitrile. The measured absolute rate constants increased with increasing pressure Ayf ranged from —10 to —18 cm /mol and were independent of solvent. These results were consistent with an early, and not very polar transition state for the addition reaction. 

While exchange- and dispersion-induced dipole components are of a quantum nature, the multipole-induced dipole components can be modeled by classical relationships, if the quantum effects are small. For many systems of practical interest, multipolar induction generates the dominant dipole components. The classical multipole induction approximation has been very successful, except for the weakly polarizable partners (e.g., He atoms) [193]. It models the dipole induced in the collisional partner by polarization in the molecular multipole fields. 

Chromosomes occur in pairs of each pair, one member is contributed by the mother and one by the father. Therefore, genes also occur in pairs. A gene that produces its characteristic effect (its phenotype) when only one of its type is present is dominant. If two are required, the gene is recessive. If a mutant gene is recessive, hundreds of generations may pass before it chances to encounter a partner like itself, which permits its effect to be expressed. In contrast, a dominant mutation may be expressed in the generation immediately after it occurs. 

Taking the solvation into account in such models is both very difficult and necessary for the best possible understanding of these exceedingly complex phenomena. The disolvation of the amides dimer (one solvent per lithium in THF, THF + HMPA or THF + DMPU)50 seems to be indicated, while trisolvated dimers appear relatively unstable. However, a very extensive semiempirical theoretical (MNDO) study on the various cyclic and open mixed aggregates formed by LDA and LiTMP with LiCl or three different enolates, solvated by discrete molecules of THF or HMPA, showed that general conclusions are almost impossible to draw48. A complex interplay of steric effects, induced by the partners of the aggregate and the solvent, seems to be the dominant influence on the relative stabilities of the species characterized. 

Rates of thermal cracking are first-order in good approximation for propane, butane and still higher hydrocarbons [21], This is remarkable because chain mechanisms with initiation by break-up of a reactant normally result in reaction orders of one half or one-and-a-half, depending on which radical is consumed by termination. First-order behavior can result from "mixed" termination, which, however, can in most cases be ruled out as dominant mechanism (see Section 9.3). A more probable explanation is a combination of effects that key hydrocarbon radicals participate in several steps of different molecularities, that some steps are reversible, and that some unimolecular ones require collision partners. 

Despite the dominance of entropy in these reactive carbene addition reactions a kind of defacto enthalpic control operates the entropies of activation are all very similar, so that in any comparison of the reactivities of alkene pairs (i.e., rgi), the rate constant ratios reflect differences in AAHi, which ultimately appear in AAGf Thus carbenic philicity, which is the pattern created by carbenic reactivity, behaves in accord with our qualitative ideas about structure/reactivity relations, as modulated by substituent effects in both the carbene and alkene partners of the addition reactions. [66,99]... 

---