Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Distortion in structure

Table I gives the fitting parameters for Equation 6, the values being chosen with the constraint that they also give the experimentally observed contact angle. The interaction and distortion energies, Eq and B, correspond to only a few hundred cal mole for the process (bulk water) - (adsorbed film), and it is important to realize that relatively minor energy effects are deteinnlnatlve of the adsorption and contact angle behavior. The energy relaxation distance, 1/S, is much larger for water adsorbed on PTFE than on PE, while the distortion relaxation distance, 1/8, is smaller. The picture is that water on PTFE is more weakly held than on PE, but more distorted in structure relative to bulk water. Table I gives the fitting parameters for Equation 6, the values being chosen with the constraint that they also give the experimentally observed contact angle. The interaction and distortion energies, Eq and B, correspond to only a few hundred cal mole for the process (bulk water) - (adsorbed film), and it is important to realize that relatively minor energy effects are deteinnlnatlve of the adsorption and contact angle behavior. The energy relaxation distance, 1/S, is much larger for water adsorbed on PTFE than on PE, while the distortion relaxation distance, 1/8, is smaller. The picture is that water on PTFE is more weakly held than on PE, but more distorted in structure relative to bulk water.
Since the development of grazing incidence x-ray diffraction, much of the convincing evidence for long-range positional order in layers has come from this technique. Structural relaxations from distorted hexagonal structure toward a relaxed array have been seen in heneicosanol [215]. Rice and co-workers combine grazing incidence x-ray diffraction with molecular dynamics simulations to understand several ordering transitions [178,215-219]. [Pg.135]

The explanation of low-pressure hysteresis proposed by Amell and McDermott some thirty years ago was formulated in terms of the swelling of the particles which accompanies adsorption. The swelling distorts the structure, for example by prising apart weak junctions between primary... [Pg.234]

Restraints due to artifacts may, by chance, be completely consistent with the correct structure of the molecule. However, the majority of incorrect restraints will be inconsistent with the correct structural data (i.e., the correct restraints and information from the force field). Inconsistencies in the data produce distortions in the structure and violations in some restraints. Structural consistency is often taken as the final criterion to identify problematic restraints. It is, for example, the central idea in the bound-smoothing part of distance geometry algorithms, and it is intimately related to the way distance data are usually specified The error bounds are set wide enough that all data are geometrically consistent. [Pg.264]

Figure 5 Optimization of the objective function in Modeller. Optimization of the objective function (curve) starts with a random or distorted model structure. The iteration number is indicated below each sample structure. The first approximately 2000 iterations coiTespond to the variable target function method [82] relying on the conjugate gradients technique. This approach first satisfies sequentially local restraints, then slowly introduces longer range restraints until the complete objective function IS optimized. In the remaining 4750 iterations, molecular dynamics with simulated annealing is used to refine the model [83]. CPU time needed to generate one model is about 2 mm for a 250 residue protein on a medium-sized workstation. Figure 5 Optimization of the objective function in Modeller. Optimization of the objective function (curve) starts with a random or distorted model structure. The iteration number is indicated below each sample structure. The first approximately 2000 iterations coiTespond to the variable target function method [82] relying on the conjugate gradients technique. This approach first satisfies sequentially local restraints, then slowly introduces longer range restraints until the complete objective function IS optimized. In the remaining 4750 iterations, molecular dynamics with simulated annealing is used to refine the model [83]. CPU time needed to generate one model is about 2 mm for a 250 residue protein on a medium-sized workstation.
Part of a 15-nm long, 10 A tube, is given in Fig. 1. Its surface atomic structure is displayed[14], A periodic lattice is clearly seen. The cross-sectional profile was also taken, showing the atomically resolved curved surface of the tube (inset in Fig. 1). Asymmetry variations in the unit cell and other distortions in the image are attributed to electronic or mechanical tip-surface interactions[15,16]. From the helical arrangement of the tube, we find that it has zigzag configuration. [Pg.66]

In structure I (numbered 1 in the IRC output), we find a formaldehyde-like structure, although the O-C-H bond angles are distorted from the equilibrium geometry. However, we can identify the minimum along this side of the path as formaldehyde. [Pg.178]

Figure 10.10 The structure of polystannide and polyplumbide anions (a) the slightly distorted Djk structure of [Sns] ", (b) the />3y, structure of [PbsP , and (c) the unique structure of [Sn ] all Sn-Sn distances are in the range 295-302pm except those in the slightly longer upper square (1,3,6,4) which are in the range 319-331 pm the angles within the two par lel squares are all 90 ( 0.8 ). Figure 10.10 The structure of polystannide and polyplumbide anions (a) the slightly distorted Djk structure of [Sns] ", (b) the />3y, structure of [PbsP , and (c) the unique structure of [Sn ] all Sn-Sn distances are in the range 295-302pm except those in the slightly longer upper square (1,3,6,4) which are in the range 319-331 pm the angles within the two par lel squares are all 90 ( 0.8 ).
The influence of electron-count on cluster geometry has been very elegantly shown by a crystallographic study of the deep-red compound [K(ctypt)]g [Ge9]- [Ge9] .2.5en, prepared by the reaction of KGe with cryptand in ethylenediamine. [Ge9] has the C4, unicapped square-antiprismatic structure (10.10c) whereas [Ge9]- , with 2 less electrons, adopts a distorted Dit, structure which clearly derives from the tricapped trigonal prism (p. 153).The field is one of... [Pg.394]

Chlorates and bromates feature the expected pyramidal ions X03 with angles close to the tetrahedral (106-107°). With iodates the interatomic angles at iodine are rather less (97-105°) and there are three short I-O distances (177-190 pm) and three somewhat longer distances (251-300 pm) leading to distorted perovskite structures (p. 963) with pseudo-sixfold coordination of iodine and piezoelectric properties (p. 58). In Sr(I03)2.H20 the coordination number of iodine rises to 7 and this increases still further to 8 (square antiprism) in Ce(I03)4 and Zr(I03)4. [Pg.863]

The most important members of this class are the osmium nitrido, and the osmyl complexes. The reddish-purple K2[OsNCl5] mentioned above is the result of reducing the osmiamate. The anion has a distorted octahedral structure with a formal triple bond Os=N (161pm) and a pronounced /ram-influence (pp. 1163-4), i.e. the Os-Cl distance trans to Os-N is much longer than the Os-Cl distances cis to Os-N (261 and 236 pm respectively). The anion [OsNCls] also shows a rram-effect in that the Cl opposite the N is more labile than the others, leading, for instance, to the formation of [Os NCl4] , which has a square-pyramidal structure with the N occupying the apical position. [Pg.1085]


See other pages where Distortion in structure is mentioned: [Pg.114]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.1774]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.736]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.684]    [Pg.968]    [Pg.982]    [Pg.1008]    [Pg.1085]    [Pg.1184]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.46 ]




SEARCH



Distorted structures

Distortions, structural

Jahn-Teller distortions in crystal structures

Structure distortion

© 2024 chempedia.info