Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Discrete boundary

For a polydisperse solution—the hallmark of solutions of polysaccharides—s (and s ) will be a weight average [30,38,39]. If the solution contains more than one discrete (macromolecular) species—e.g. a mixture of different polysaccharides, the polydispersity will be manifested by asymmetry in the sedimenting boundary or, if the species have significantly different values for S2o,w. discrete boundaries are resolved (Fig. 2b [29]). [Pg.220]

The electrostatic properties of the molecule may be used as a criterion for judging the MEM enhancement. Using the uniform prior density, the MEM molecular dipole moment derived by the discrete boundary partitioning of space (chapter 6) is only 1.3 D, compared with 9.1 D based on the experimental density,... [Pg.120]

Figure 6.1 shows the stockholder decomposition of the theoretical deformation density of the cyanoacetylene molecule, H—Cs=C—C=N (Hirshfeld 1977b). The overlap density in the bonds is distributed between the bonded atoms. The assignment of part of the density near the hydrogen nucleus to the adjacent carbon atom manifests the difference between fuzzy and discrete boundary partitioning methods. [Pg.122]

TABLE 6.1 Net Charges q (e) from the Stockholder Partitioning. Charges in the Second Row are from a Discrete Boundary Partitioning by Politzer (1971) and Politzer and Reggio (1972)... [Pg.123]

If the ratio on the left is the smallest, the point i belongs to atom A, and thus to molecule /, and vice versa. The discrete boundary Van-der- Waals-ratio partition-... [Pg.125]

FIG. 6.3 Definition of vectors used in discrete boundary space partitioning. [Pg.125]

When space is partitioned with discrete boundaries, as in Eq. (6.7) and in the Bader virial partitioning method, the moments can be derived directly from the structure factors by a modified Fourier summation, as described for the net charge in chapter 6. [Pg.151]

All quantities are given in units of 10 30 Cm (see Appendix K for conversion factors). The 6-31G ab-initio results have been obtained at the SCF level, generally at the neutron crystal geometry. DI direct integration. DB discrete boundary. FB fuzzy boundary, i.e.. stockholder concept. [Pg.157]

An upwind difference of the convective term presumes that v is always positive, that is, that vertical flow from the lower toward the upper plate. The discrete boundary conditions are given as... [Pg.233]

In order to determine the field quantities such as displacements, strains and stresses inside the laminate, away from the discretized boundary, the first part of equation (21) is considered ... [Pg.544]

On a macroscopic scale, the interface can be regarded as a discrete boundary. On the molecular scale, however, the change from one place to another takes place over several molecular diameters. Due to movement of molecules, this region is in a state of violent change, the whole surface layer changing many times a second. Transfer of molecules at the actual interface is, therefore, virtually instantaneous and the two phases are, at this point in equilibrium. [Pg.3878]

The above equation is derived from the electroneutrahty law for homogeneous environments and is the governing equation to be solved for determining the potential distribution. To solve this equation, appropriate boundary conditions need to be specified. Finite element methods divide the three-dimensional electrolyte volume into a network of finite nodes whose electrical properties are connected to one another by linear equations. Finite element methods yield potential and current distributions within the electrolyte volume. Incorporation of polarization at the anode and cathode surfiices is difficult at volume boundaries. BEM has shown considerable promise in treating this problem. The electrode surface is divided into discrete boundary elements that are solved numerically. Unhke the finite difference methods, in the BEM only the electrode surfaces are divided into discrete elements and not the entire volume, leading to decreased computation power. [Pg.631]

Most implicit solvent models require a deBnition of the solvent density and/or dielectric coefficient profile around the solute molecule. Often, these definitions take the form of anal3Aic functions [18, 77, 78] or discrete boundary surfaces dividing the solute-solvent regions of the problem domain. The van der Waals surface, solvent accessible surface [79], and molecular surface (MS) [80]... [Pg.419]

The results are given in Table 2, first row. (The method of steepest descent fails in all cases.) E.g. for the Chebyquad function the subspace approach is 1.7 times cheaper than Newton s method. However, this gradient space fails in all runs for the discrete boundary value function. (It fails because of the limit of 200 outer iterations. But the subspace approach uses much less flops than the successful Newton method, see Table 2). [Pg.188]

A detailed formulation of the employed 3-D BEM is too extensive and beyond the scope of this paper and can be found in O Brien and Rizos (2005), Rizos (1993), Rizos (2000), Rizos and Karabalis (1994) and Rizos and Loya (2002). The BEM uses the time domain 4th order B-Spline fundamental solutions of the 3-D full space along with higher order spatial discretization of the boundary. The Boundary Integral Equation associated to the Navier-Cauchy governing equations of motion is expressed in a discrete form yielding a system of algebraic equations at step N relating displacements u to forces f at discrete boundary nodes in the BEM model and at discrete time instants tj and Ty, as... [Pg.192]

Inmitively, we think of the atomic radius as the distance between the nucleus of an atom and its valence shell (i.e., the outermost shell that is occupied by one or more electrons), because we usually envision atoms as spheres with discrete boundaries. According to the quantum mechanical model of the atom, though, there is no specific distance from the nucleus beyond which an electron may not be found [W Section 6.7]. Therefore, the atomic radius requires a specific definition. [Pg.246]

From this discretized boundary condition, we write the nonexistent grid value as... [Pg.268]


See other pages where Discrete boundary is mentioned: [Pg.552]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.651]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.1083]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.243]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.122 , Pg.123 , Pg.124 , Pg.125 , Pg.126 , Pg.127 , Pg.128 , Pg.129 , Pg.151 ]




SEARCH



Atomic fragments defined by discrete boundaries

Boundary conditions, discrete-particles

Boundary discretization

Boundary discretization

Boundary element methods discretization technique

Partitioning discrete boundary

© 2024 chempedia.info