Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dirac-Fock time-dependent

The time-dependent Hartree-Fock theory was first discussed by Dirac (1930b) and subsequently in perturbative form by Dalgamo and Victor (1966). Its relationship to time-dependent perturbation theory has been discussed by Langhoff, Epstein and Karplus (1972). [Pg.300]

The relativistic or non-relativistic random-phase approximation (RRPA or RPA)t is a generalized self-consistent field procedure which may be derived making the Dirac/Hartree-Fock equations time-dependent. Therefore, the approach is often called time-dependent Dirac/Hartree-Fock. The name random phase comes from the original application of this method to very large systems where it was argued that terms due to interactions between many alternative pairs of excited particles, so-called two-particle-two-hole interactions ((2p-2h) see below) tend to... [Pg.209]

When extended to include electronic correlation, for which an exact but implicit orbital functional was derived above, the TDHF formalism becomes a formally exact theory of linear response. In practice, some simplified orbital functional Ec[ 4>i ] must be used, and the accuracy of results is limited by this choice. The Hartree-Fock operator Ti is replaced by G = Ti + vc. Dirac defines an idempo-tent density operator p whose kernel is JA i(r) i (r/)- The Did. equations are equivalent to [0, p] = 0. The corresponding time-dependent equations are itijtP = [Q(t), p(t)]. Dirac proved, for Hermitian G, (hat the time-dependent equation ih i(rt) implies that p(l) is idempotent. Hence pit) corresponds to a normalized time-dependent reference state. [Pg.84]

It has recently been shown [ 12] that time-dependent or linear-response theory based on local exchange and correlation potentials is inconsistent in the pure exchange limit with the time-dependent Hartree-Fock theory (TDHF) of Dirac [13] and with the random-phase approximation (RPA) [14] including exchange. The DFT-based exchange-response kernel [15] is inconsistent with the structure of the second-quantized Hamiltonian. [Pg.8]

The derivation by Dirac [13] of TDHF can be expressed in terms of orbital functional derivatives [12]. This derivation can be extended directly to a formally exact time-dependent orbital-functional theory (TDOFT). The Hartree-Fock operator H is replaced by the OFT operator Q = TL + vc throughout Dirac s derivation. In the linear-response limit, this generalizes the RPA equations [14] to include correlation response [17]. [Pg.14]

From a very general point of view every ion-atom collision system has to be treated as a correlated many-body time-dependent quantum system. To solve this from an ab initio point of view is still impossible. So, one has to rely on various approximations. Nowadays the best method which can be applied to realistic collision systems (which we discuss here) is on the level of the non-selfconsistent time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Slater or, in the relativistic case, the Dirac-Fock-Slater method. Up-to-now no correlation beyond this approximation can be taken into account in the case of 3 or more electrons. (This is in accordance with the definition of correlation given by Lowdin [1] in 1956) In addition no QED contributions, i.e. no correction to the 1/r Coulomb interaction between the electrons, ever have been taken into account, although in very heavy collision systems this effect may become important. This will be discussed in section 5. A short survey of the theory used is followed by our results on impact parameter dependent electron transfer and excitation calculations of ion-atom and ion-solid collisions as well as first results of an ab initio calculation of MO X-rays in such complicated many particle scattering systems. [Pg.273]

Here n is the number of (in the restricted Hartree-Fock case, doubly filled) bands and J and K are again the Coulomb and exchange operators, respectively, formed now with the aid of the four-component relativistic HF COs instead of the nonrelativistic one-component HF COs. In deriving equation (1.110) the time-dependent factor of has been eliminated by diiferentiating with respect to time contained in the original Dirac operator... [Pg.37]

A simple application of the very general approach used in earlier sections leads to the time-dependent generalization of Hartree-Fock theory. The time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) equations (Dirac, 1929) were first formulated variationally by Frenkel (1934) they are also widely used in nuclear physics (see e.g. Thouless, 1%1) under the name random-phase approximation (RPA). Since the equations describe response to a perturbation, as in Section 11.9 but now time-dependent, they will... [Pg.435]

Even though the spin orbitals obtained from (2.23) in general do not have the full symmetry of the Hamiltonian, they may have some symmetry properties. In order to study these Fukutome considered the transformation properties of solutions of (2.24) with respect to spin rotations and time reversal. Whatever spatial symmetry the system under consideration has, its Hamiltonian always commutes with these operators. As we will see, the effective one-electron Hamiltonian (2.25) in general only commutes with some of them, since it depends on these solutions themselves via the Fock-Dirac matrix. [Pg.230]


See other pages where Dirac-Fock time-dependent is mentioned: [Pg.215]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.280]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.161 ]




SEARCH



Dirac-Fock

© 2024 chempedia.info