Dipole moment of methanol

Carbon-oxygen and carbon-halogen bonds are polar covalent bonds and carbon bears a partial positive charge in alcohols ( " C—0 ) and in alkyl halides ( " C—X ) Alcohols and alkyl halides are polar molecules The dipole moments of methanol and chloromethane are very similar to each other and to water... 

Problem 2.4 Account for the observed dipole moment of methanol (CH3OH, 1.70 D) by using a crossed arrow to indicate the direction in which electron density is displaced. 

Water-methanol mixtures are important solvent media in both chemistry and biochemistry. It was found that water-methanol mixtures utilize the phenomenon of preferential solvation of ions and hydrophobic solutes. It is worth mentioning here that the dipole moment of methanol is slightly lower than that of water. Moreover the presence of the methyl group not only prevents the strong electrostatic interaction with the other species but also makes methanol molecules considerably more bulky as compared with water molecules. Apart from the structural particulars, the dynamics of this cosolvent along with water is rather complex in water-methanol mixtures. 

Alcohols and alkyl halides are polar molecules. The dipole moments of methanol and chlo-romethane are very similar to each other and to water. 

Many of the properties oj -hydroxypyridines are typical of phenols. It was long assumed that they existed exclusively in the hydroxy form, and early physical measurements seemed to confirm this. For example, the ultraviolet spectrum of a methanolic solution of 3-hydroxypyridine is very similar to that of the 3-methoxy analog, and the value of the dipole moment of 3-hydroxypyridine obtained in dioxane indicates little, if any, zwitterion formation. However, it has now become clear that the hydroxy form is greatly predominant only in solvents of low dielectric constant. Comparison of the pK values of 3-hydroxypyridine with those of the alternative methylated forms indicated that the two tautomeric forms are of comparable stability in aqueous solution (Table II), and this was confirmed using ultraviolet spectroscopy. The ratios calculated from the ultraviolet spectral data are in good agreement with those de-... 

The dipole moments of oxepin and benzene oxide have been calculated to be in the range 0.76-1.36 D and >1.5 D respectively using the ab initio SCF and MINDO/3 methods (80JA1255). The lower calculated dipole moment would be in accord with experimental observations where the equilibrium was found to favor oxepin (7) in less polar solvents. Coordination between the oxirane oxygen atom and polar solvent molecules would also strengthen the C—C bond of the epoxide and thus lead to a preference for the benzene oxide isomer <72AG(E)825). Thus the proportion of oxepin (7) was found by UV spectral analysis to be higher in isooctane solvent (70%) than in water-methanol (10%). 

N0 H—0< would contribute a dipole moment of 1 3 Debyes. This suggests that the observed dipole moments of H-bonded systems are due both to this and also to electron shifts in the remainder of the two molecules. The example of triphenyl methanol-trimethyl amine referred to in my answer to Dr. Pople shows that about 0 7 D may be due to the simple polar structure. 

The dipole moment of a molecule is the vectorial sum of the individual dipoles within it. Bond dipoles are usually represented using the symbol /x and are expressed in units of Debye. The dipoles result from charge separation. The carbon-carbon bond in ethane, H3C—CH3 is symmetrical and not expected to have a dipole moment. The carbon-oxygen bond of methanol (CH3OH), on the other hand, links two elements of differing electronegativity and is expected to have a significant molecular dipole. Methanol s molecular dipole is 1.7 whereas, for ethane, it is 0. 

Solvent strength in the critical region. All of the experiments were performed with the dye phenol blue which has been well-characterized both experimentally and theoretically in liquid solvents (20,21,22). Since the dipole moment of phenol blue increases 2.5 debye upon electronic excitation (8), it is a sensitive probe of the local solvent environment. For example the absorption maxima occur at 550 and 608 nm in n-hexane and methanol, respectively. The excited state is stabilized to a greater extent than the ground state as the "solvent strength" is increased, which is designated as a red shift. 

According to its and NMR spectra, this vinylogous amide exists as the E-s-E form in polar solvents such as [D4]methanol, and as a mixture of Z-s-Z and E-s-E isomers in nonpolar solvents such as deuterio-trichloromethane (30 cmol/mol /36a) and 70 cmol/mol (36b)). As expected, the more dipolar E-s-E form is stabilized in polar solvents (dipole moment of the related E-s-E 3-dimethylaminopropenal 21 10 Cm). 

Although neutral methanol and ammonia are more stable in vacuo than their ions, the reaction field is capable of inverting this gap. At 3.0A as the spherical cavity radius, the diionic form becomes more stable. The tetrahedral substrate can approach the dyad to a shorter distance than the planar substrate. The repulsive barrier occurs at distances shorter than 2.5A for the planar, but only at 2.0A for the tetrahedral. The tetrahedral substrate is more stabilized by the reaction field effect than the planar substrate, due to an increase in the in-vacuo dipole moment of the tetrahedral. The reaction field is supposed to mimic the protein surrounding, and it is proposed that the protein stabilizes the diionic form even though the simulation of the reaction field is not sufficient to obtain a realistic interpretation. This study indicates a tendency to tetrahedralization of the model substrate at distances characteristic of the Michaelis-Menten complex formation. The authors believe that this must affect intermolecular interactions of large substrates. 

---