Dimethyl sulfoxide, electrostatic

Dimethyl sulfoxide, electrostatic potential map of, 40 formal charges in, 40-41 Sn2 reaction and, 371... 

Find the model of dimethyl sulfoxide [(CH3)2S=0] on Learning By Modeling and exam me Its electrostatic potential map To which atom (S or O) would you expect a proton to bond d... 

When dissolved in nonpolar solvents such as benzene or diethyl ether, the colourless (2a) forms an equally colourless solution. However, in more polar solvents [e.g. acetone, acetonitrile), the deep-red colour of the resonance-stabilized carbanion of (3a) appears (1 = 475... 490 nm), and its intensity increases with increasing solvent polarity. The carbon-carbon bond in (2a) can be broken merely by changing from a less polar to a more polar solvent. Cation and anion solvation provides the driving force for this heterolysis reaction, whereas solvent displacement is required for the reverse coordination reaction. The Gibbs energy for the heterolysis of (2a) correlates well with the reciprocal solvent relative permittivity in accordance with the Born electrostatic equation [285], except for EPD solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide, which give larger values than would be expected for a purely electrostatic solvation [284]. 

It is a serious drawback that it is not possible to determine the transfer activity coefficient of the proton (or of any other single-ion species) directly by thermodynamic methods, because only the values for both the proton and its counterion are obtained. Therefore, approximation methods are used to separate the medium effect on the proton. One is based on the simple sphere-in-continuum model of Born, calculating the electrostatic contribution of the Gibb s free energy of transfer. This approach is clearly too weak, because it does not consider solvation effects. Different ex-trathermodynamic approximation methods, unfortunately, lead not only to different values of the medium effect but also to different signs in some cases. Some examples are given in the following log yH+ for methanol -1-1.7 (standard deviation 0.4) ethanol -1-2.5 (1.8), n-butanol -t-2.3 (2.0), dimethyl sulfoxide -3.6 (2.0), acetonitrile -1-4.3 (1.5), formic acid -1-7.9 (1.7), NH3 -16. From these data, it can be seen that methanol has about the same basicity as water the other alcohols are less basic, as is acetonitrile. Di-... 

The effect of the solvent on the abundance of the conformers of 2-meth-oxyoxane is demonstrated in Table XIV, where molar fractions of the axial form are compared with available experimental data already shown in Table VI. For a number of solvents, the agreement is remarkably good. Although the results indicate a decreased abundance of the a form of 2-methoxyoxane with increase in the dielectric constant of the solvent, the dependence is not a simple one. The calculations also reproduce such subtle factors as the pronounced effect of chloroform when compared with other solvents of similar polarity and, conversely, a relatively weak effect of dimethyl sulfoxide in comparison to less-polar solvents. The analysis of the role of individual solvation energy terms in the total energy suggests that the conformationally most important term is the contribution of electrostatic interactions that stabilize the ap conformations. Conversely, the dispersion term shows only a shght conformational dependence. 

---