Diffraction order separation

Obviously the gain in coherence has to be paid for by a dramatic drop in the count rate because the signal decreases quadratically with the distance from the source and linearly with the size of each collimation slit. Although the first collimating slit alone already provides coherence, we still have to introduce a second collimating slit - in our case also 7 pm wide and about 1 m downstream from the first slit. The reason for this is the requirement that the collimated beam width needs to be significantly smaller than the separation between the diffraction orders behind the grating in order to clearly resolve the diffraction peaks in Fig. 2. 

One can conceive various experimental arrangements to demonstrate the wave-nature of material particles and many interferometers have already been built for molecules as mentioned in Sec. 1. However, all these arrangements needed well collimated beams or experimentally distinguishable internal states in order to separate the various diffraction orders. This requirement makes them less suitable for large clusters and molecules for which brilliant sources and highly efficient detection schemes still have to be developed. 

From these relations, Warren and Averbach suggested, in the 1950s, a method to separate the effects of size from the effects of microstrains. They observed that the size term which is written in the form An = N /N3 does not depend on the diffraction order 1, whereas this order plays a role in the expression of the term... 

Artificial photonic crystals are structures built so that they contain diffracting centres separated by distances that are of the order of the wavelength of light. The interaction with light can be understood in terms of the Bragg equation. However, the terminology employed to describe diffraction in artificial photonic crystals is that of semiconductor physics. The transition from a diffraction description to a physical description can be illustrated with respect to a one-dimensional photonic crystal. 

The regions of rotation with different handedness are not separated by an absorption band as in typical gyrotropic materials. Instead, there is a band of a selective reflection of the beam with a particular circular polarization, curve R in Fig. 12.1. The beam with the opposite circular polarization is transmitted without any change, therefore the reflection is negligible and not shown in the plot. Only one band is observed in the wavelength spectmm without higher diffraction orders. 

The light diffracted, in a far field approximation, follows the Fourier transform distribution and the intensity for the different diffraction orders, m, is proportional to sim 2(diffraction orders is given by XR/d, where R is the distance between the binary transmissive diffraction grating and the Fourier plane (Kashnow, 1973). 

It is very difficult to separate the broadening of a reflection into components due to small crystallite size and to structural defects. Equation (65) implies that PcosO should be constant for all glancing angles, if the broadening results entirely from small crystallite size. Because L is the dimension peipendicular to the diffracting net planes, this statement cannot hold rigorously, except for the diffraction orders of one and the same net plane. If line broadening is the consequence of crystal structure defects alone, the width increases with 0. 

Here d is the line separation and a and p the angles of incidence and reflection, respectively. The resolving power of the grating is determined by the total number of illuminated lines N and by the diffraction order m, i.e.. 

According to Equation 3.1 all diffraction orders of the echelle grating superimpose and cannot be initially distinguished by the detector of a spectrometer. Consequently order separation by an additional dispersing component is essential for unambiguous wavelength determination. 

---