Diagonalizing matrices

In light of the special structure of the diagonal matrices k, whose blocks are lower triangle, the components s = 1,2,..., z, of the unknown vector yjQ.) are to be determined successively by the elimination method in passing from a to qH- 1 and from s to s- 1. By the elimination formulas for a three-point equation we constitute in a term-by-term fashion the vectors a = 1,2,..., p. Moving in reverse order from a -f 1 to a and from s -b 1 to s the vectors y(p+i), >y(2p) recovered from the system... 

Defining sx and sy as the diagonal matrices of sample standard deviations on x and y, respectively, the sample correlation matrix would be... 

Using matrix notation, we define Dso and Dvo to be diagonal matrices with elements S° and v° on the diagonal, respectively. The normalized (or scaled) matrices of elasticities e and control coefficients Cs are then obtained by the... 

Diagonal matrices are handy when individual rows or columns of a matrix are to be multiplied by different scalar factors si...sn. One typical example is the normalisation of B so that the square root of the sum of all squared elements in, for example, each row of B becomes one, i.e. unity length of each row vector. 

If columns (or rows) of X are normalised to the square root of the sum of their squared elements (i.e. to unity length), the matrix is called orthonormal. Recall that earlier this kind of normalisation was solved most elegantly by right (left) multiplication with a diagonal matrix comprising the appropriate normalisation coefficients. See the section introducing diagonal matrices for more details. 

Note that all elements of diagonal matrices and s remain limited, especially those eorresponding to high-order evanescent modes. 

While previous variational 2-RDM calculations for electronic systems have employed the above formulation [20-31], the size of the largest block diagonal matrices in the 2-RDMs may be further reduced by using spin-adapted operators Ci in Eq. (9). Spin-adapted operators are defined to satisfy the following mathematical relations [54, 55] ... 

Table I (which can be deduced from Ref. [15]) shows the dimensions of the block-diagonal matrices of X and the number of linear equalities m in Eq. (1) relative to the number r of spin orbitals of a generic reference basis when employing the primal SDP formulation. It also considers conditions on oc electron number, total spin, and spin symmetries of the A-representability. In the table...

If we employ the dual SDP formulation and include the P, Q, G, Tl, and T2 conditions, the number of rows/columns of the largest block-diagonal matrices scale as 3r /16 again, while m scales as 3r" /64 and s as /A. 

The advantages of the dual SDP formulation are clear when comparing Tables I and II. First, notice that the sizes of the block-diagonal matrices are unchanged in both formulations. There is also an additional constraint = c in the dual SDP formulation, which is absent in the primal SDP formulation. Then, while the size m of equality constraint in the primal SDP formulation (see Eq. (1)) corresponds to the dimensions of the Q, G, Tl, and T2 matrices included in the formulation and scales as 25r /576, the dimension m of the variable vector y e R " in the dual SDP formulation (see Eq. (4)) corresponds to the dimension of the 2-RDM and scales merely as 3r" /64. The difference becomes more remarkable when more //-representabUity conditions are considered in these primal or dual SDP formulations. Computational implications when solving the SDP problems employing the primal and dual SDP formulations are discussed in Section V. 

In order to illustrate how the closedness of the orbit is determined, we consider the case Gc is the complex torus Tc = (C )r. We choose a basis aq,..., xn of V so that Tc is contained in the group of nonsingular diagonal matrices. Then we have distinguished... 

From here the components of the vector w, a = 1,2,..., p, can be recovered independently, since the operators Da = E + r2Ra possess diagonal matrices of coefficients with diagonal blocks. 

The detenninant of the product matrix is the product of the three determinants. The detenninant of the center matrix is -1/2. The determinants ofthe diagonal matrices are the products of the diagonal elements. Therefore, the Jacobian is J= abs( 3x/3y )= //(x,x2x3)/(y ) = 2(y1/y2) (after making the substitutions for x,). 

This basis illustrates that these vectors are eigenstates of the H, H2, and H2 matrices with diagonal entries kJj/2. We assign the off diagonal matrices to be... 

For implicit schemes, we will obtain a system of linear algebraic equations that must be solved. As mentioned in Example 8.1, one-dimensional diffusion problems generate tri-diagonal matrices, that can be solved for using the Thomas algorithm or other fast matrix routines. Equation (8.83) can be written as... 

Since diagonal matrices are square, unit matrices must be square (but zero matrices can be any size). Clearly, multiplication (when permitted) by the unit matrix leaves the other matrix unchanged 1A = A1 = A. 

---