Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Determinant Revisited

Previously, the determinant for a 2 x 2 matrix was defined, and it was stated that it is easy to calculate the determinant for a 3 x 3 matrix. Existence, uniqueness, families of solutions, rank, and even the determinant are all determined via the Gaussian elimination process. [Pg.66]

Note that each step in the Gaussian elimination process can be expressed as [Pg.66]

The matrix, M, on the left is a lower triangular transformation matrix and its determinant is 1 (this is easy to verify). One algebraic rule for determinants is that the determinant of a product is the product of determinants therefore, the determinant of the transformed matrix (S,) is the same as that of A, since det(Af,) = 1. [Pg.66]

The next step is to eliminate the remaining nonzero elanent below the diagonal as follows  [Pg.66]


Matrices and Determinants Revisited Alternative Routes to Determining Scalar and Vector Products... [Pg.100]

Tagliaro, F. et al.. Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin determination revisited with capillary electrophoresis A new biochemical marker of chronic alcohol abuse, J. Cap. Electrophor. Microchip Tech., 5, 137, 1999. [Pg.704]

Rupert Emerson, Self-determination Revisited in the Era of Decolonization (Cambridge, MA Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, 1964). [Pg.187]

Murray G (1922) Self-determination of nationalities. J Br Inst Int Aff 1 6-13 Nanda VP (1997) The new dynamics of self-determination revisiting self-deteiminati(Hi as an international law concept a major challenge in the post-cold war era. ILSA J Int Comp Law... [Pg.217]

Numerical Methods for Chemical Engineers Using Excel , VBA, and MATLAB 3.7.2 Determinant Revisited... [Pg.66]

Let us revisit the depbenolization problem described in Sections 3.2 and 6.3. The objective is to synthesize a MOC-MEN with the least number of units. First, CID (Fig. 6.3) and the tables of exchangeable loads TEL (Tables 6.7 and 6.8) are developed based on the MOC solution identified in Sections 3.2 and 6.3. Since neither S4 nor S5 were selected as part of the MCX2 solution, there is no need to include them. Furthermore, since the optimal flowrates of S, S2 and S3 have been determined, the TEL for the MSAs can now be developed with the total loads of MSAs and not per kg of each MSA. [Pg.139]

Nurse I wondered whether it might be worth revisiting the issue of what determines organ size, because this is obviously relevant to a number of issues that have risen. Martin Raff, do you have any thoughts about overall organ size and how that is regulated ... [Pg.158]

The LMIPDA-IMM calculations are performed for all combinations of revisit times in A and waveforms in the library. Evidently then the number of combinations grows exponentially in the number of steps ahead, and soon becomes impractical for implementation. Having obtained the error covariance matrix for all possible combinations of sensor modes, the optimal sensor mode (waveform) is then chosen for each target to be the one which gives the longest re-visit time, while constraining the absolute value of the determinant of the error covariance matrix to be smaller than the prescribed upper limit K. In other words, our objective is... [Pg.289]

We have, on the other hand done simple simulations for the case of one-step ahead and two-step ahead scheduling. In the latter case, the revisit times and waveforms are calculated while the target states are propagated forward over two measurements, with the cost function being the absolute value of the determinant of the track error covariance after the second measurement. Only the first of these measurements is done before the revisit calculation is done again for that target, so that the second may never be implemented. [Pg.290]

In the course of the analysis, it may be determined that more data are required in order to achieve the goals of the study. If so, then activities described in Sections 4.2 through 4.4 may need to be revisited. [Pg.101]

Thereafter, a reference text such as Enzyme Kinetics (Segel, 1993) should be consulted to determine whether or not the proposed mechanism has been described and characterized previously. For the example given, it would be found that the proposed mechanism corresponds to a system referred to as partial competitive inhibition, and an equation is provided which can be applied to the experimental data. If the data can be fitted successfully by applying the equation through nonlinear regression, the proposed mechanism would be supported further secondary graphing approaches to confirm the mechanism are also provided in texts such as Enzyme Kinetics, and values could be obtained for the various associated constants. If the data cannot be fitted successfully, the proposed reaction scheme should be revisited and altered appropriately, and the whole process repeated. [Pg.111]

Looking at Schemes 4 and 5, it is obvious that Woodward-Doering s synthetic route suffered from the lack of stereocontrol, which led to the production of their precursors of homomeroquinene target compound as a mixture of stereoisomers. The fact that the yield of such a transformation was not clearly determined, in addition to the anticipated difficult separation of the four isomers obtained at the end of the reaction (cf. Rabe-Kindler reaction), rendered this reaction commercially unpractical. Moreover, it is well accepted that Woodward and Doering never physically produced any quinine in their lab, and the success of their method is based on the assumption that Rabe and Kindler partial synthesis was a fact. This would be the center of the controversy when Stork later characterized what he called the quasi-universal impression that Woodward and Doering achieved the total synthesis of quinine as a widely believed myth . The whole story is very juicy and interested readers should refer to the amazing review published in Angewandte Chemie by Seeman in 2007. Nevertheless, in 2008, Smith and Williams successfully revisited the Rabe-Kindler conversion... [Pg.235]

The problem of Example 4.1.3 is revisited here. We determine the smoothing spline function and its derivatives assuming identical standard errors d = 0.25 in the measured pH. [Pg.244]

Prior to considering semiempirical methods designed on the basis of HF theory, it is instructive to revisit one-electron effective Hamiltonian methods like the Huckel model described in Section 4.4. Such models tend to involve the most drastic approximations, but as a result their rationale is tied closely to experimental concepts and they tend to be inmitive. One such model that continues to see extensive use today is the so-called extended Huckel theory (EHT). Recall that the key step in finding the MOs for an effective Hamiltonian is the formation of the secular determinant for the secular equation... [Pg.134]

Often, the material specifications for products have been established not on the needs for the product but on what the state-of-the-art technology is capable of producing. When this happens, a particular technology is actually being prescribed. What some companies have found is that they need to revisit the needs of the product to determine whether, for example, the sulfur content they have specified is too restrictive. Some companies have found that the product requirements can be adjusted without sacrificing the utility or the durability of the product. [Pg.230]

The transition metals are our premier metals for jewelry making. They have electron configurations that are different from the alkali metals and the alkaline earth metals. Therefore, transition metals exhibit different chemical and physical properties. It is necessary to determine just where electrons reside in transition-metal atoms so we can understand the properties of transition metals and how they bond. To understand these properties and manners of bonding, we must revisit the electron cloud atomic model. [Pg.251]

These considerations have to be applied to phenomena in which the external field has its origin in the solute (or, better, in the response of the solute to some stimulus). The characteristics of this field (behaviour in time, shape, intensity) strongly depend on the nature of the stimulus and on the properties of the solute. The analysis we have reported of the behaviour of the solvent under the action of a sinusoidal field can here be applied to the Fourier development of the field under examination. It may happen that the Fourier decomposition will reveal a range of frequencies at which experimental determinations are not available to have a detailed description of the phenomena an extension of the s(w) spectrum via simulations should be made. It may also happen that the approximation of a linear response fails in such cases the theory has to be revisited. It is a problem similar to the one we considered in Section 1.1.2 for the description of static nonlinear solvation of highly charged solutes. [Pg.17]


See other pages where Determinant Revisited is mentioned: [Pg.2337]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.728]    [Pg.694]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.204]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info