Design Optimization Procedure

This process has NR+1 design optimization variables. We select the reactor inlet temperatures T and the ratio of the reactant concentrations in the recycle stream v a/ b- The steps in the design procedure are detailed below  

Guess the temperature of the cold-shot stream Tcs- This is the temperature of the stream after the recycle gas (at an initially unknown temperature and flowrate coming from the compressor) is combined with the two fresh feedstreams at 313 K. An iteration loop is used throughout this step until the guessed value and the calculated value are sufficiently close. 

Solve a set of 2NR linear equations [Eqs. (5.14)—(5.17)] for the unknown variables that are the rates of generation of C in each reactor R( (n= 1, NR), the feed flowrate of the first reactor T], and flowrates of cold-shot streams entering the other 

Equation (5.15) gives the energy balance around each reactor  

Equation (5.16) gives the energy balance at the reactor inlet where the cold stream FCs,m added before the mth reactor is mixed with the hot-stream Fj leaving the previous reactor at rout = 500 K  

A five-dimensional grid search method is used to find the optimum values of the five design optimization variables. The following steps are used in the design procedure  

Fix the number of trays IVlt between each liquid trap-out tray at a small value. 

The vapor boilup Vj is manipulated by a proportional controller to control the level in the column base. The reflux-drum level is not controlled. 

The reflux flowrate is manipulated by a PI controller to drive the composition of product C in the distillate to its desired value. This also sets the purity of D in the bottoms product. 

The values for adiabatic reactors (Xout, Tout, AVext) calculated with Eqs. (16.1)-(16.3). 

---

The calculation methods for the flexibility index discussed below can be applied to step 3 of the worst-case design optimization procedure to maximize constraint violation instead of minimizing 8. 

It Is difficult to resolve a small number of components simultaneously. This can have significant Implications with respect to the way we handle data and design optimization procedures. 

For the System 80+ Standard Design, snubbers are minimized by using design optimization procedures (see CESSAR-DC, Section 3.9.3.4. However, where required, snubber supports are used as shock arrestors for safety-related systems and components. Snubbers are used as structural supports during a dynamic event... 

The use of a numerical heat transfer model and a design optimization procedure to simulate and synthesize the heater configuration in a laboratory-scale pultrusion die was developed and studied by Awa and West (1992). A two-dimensional steady-state conduction heat transfer model was developed to compute the temperature profile within the laboratory-scale die. 

Because of statistical uncertainties in loadings on structures and their strength it is now widely recognized that structural optimization must take Into account these uncertainties and, hence, a reliability based design optimization procedure has to be adapted. 

This mathematical optimization procedure is a rational process because the slope (or derivative) enables us to know which way to go and how far to go. In contrast, in the search procedure, we just arbitrarily choose some values of x at which to evaluate the function. Those arbitrary choices are much like what people do in most design situations. They are simply searching in a rather crude mannerfotThe solution to the problem, and they will not achieve the solution precisely. With mathematical optimization, our hope is both to speed up that process and to get a more precisely optimum solution. 

Much of the information presented in the first eight chapters of this book consisted of guidelines that would help the process engineer to save time and money. What has been presented is an optimization procedure for obtaining a preliminary chemical plant design. Like the wise small farmer, the efficient process engineer relies heavily upon information that has been obtained by others. We do not need to reinvent the wheel every time we want to construct a new vehicle. 

A more subjective approach to the multiresponse optimization of conventional experimental designs was outlined by Derringer and Suich (22). This sequential generation technique weights the responses by means of desirability factors to reduce the multivariate problem to a univariate one which could then be solved by iterative optimization techniques. The use of desirability factors permits the formulator to input the range of property values considered acceptable for each response. The optimization procedure then attempts to determine an optimal point within the acceptable limits of all responses. 

Design synthetic procedures that can be varied systematically for the purpose of optimizing specific properties of the reaction products. 

The first part of the analysis was conducted to detect the designs with minimum energy consumption for the integrated sequences. Once a validated design (tray structure) was obtained, an optimization procedure was carried out on the recycle streams for each of the three coupled sequences to detect the operating conditions under which each design was more energy efficient. 

Elompart et al. (2001), like Jozefaciuk et al. (2003), use a combined R D section (the preferred format in Analytical Chemistry, the journal that published this article). Their R D section describes both preliminary tests and optimization procedures. Results and discussion of the preliminary tests were presented in excerpt 4C results and discussion of the optimization procedures are presented in excerpt 5A. The optimization process used a factorial design in which five experimental parameters were systematically varied and tested to improve the saponification technique. These variables included the concentration of NaOH, the volume of NaOH, the extraction and stirring times, and the kind of SPME fiber used. 

Catalyst library design is considered as an optimization procedure in a multidimensional experimental space. The variables in the multi-dimensional space can be differentiated as follows (i) compositional variables, and (ii) process variables. The term compositional variables have already been discussed. 

It is obvious that such a protocol would not be employed to design a column for a single analysis or even for a few dozen analyses. The optimization procedure entails a considerable amount of work and therefore, would only be justified for a routine analysis that was repetitive and would be carried... 

J.H. de Boer, A.K. Smilde and D.A. Doombos, Introduction of a robustness coefficient in optimization Procedures Implementation in mixture design problems. Part I Theory, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 7 (1990) 223-236. 

---