Derivative gain limit

Comparison with Equation (3.33) shows that an additional function has been introduced, i.e. (1 + aT s). This introduces a lag into the controller (of time constant aTj) that is intended to reduce the amplification of measurement noise by the derivative action. Setting a to zero removes this filter, setting it to 1 will completely disable the derivative action. In some systems the value of a is configurable by the engineer. In many it is fixed, often at a value of 0.1. The reciprocal of a is known as the derivative gain limit. 

There is always a gain limit placed upon the derivative vector—a value of 10 is typical. However, interaction decreases the derivative... 

It has been pointed out that perfect derivative action is not available in conventional controllers. Derivative gain is limited to about 10, and the maximum available phase lead is in the vicinity of 45 . In effect, derivative is therefore accompanied by a lag, whose time constant is Ho the value of the derivative time. 

Because of the gain limitation placed on the derivative mode, the latter is not exactly represented by a vertical vector, but the inaccuracy is not severe above a period of 2tD. From the vector diagram of Fig. 4.7, the resultant phase and gain of the ideal controller are... 

The Ziegler and Nichols closed-loop method requires forcing the loop to cycle uniformly under proportional control. The natural period of the cycle—the proportional controller contributes no phase shift to alter it—is used to set the optimum integral and derivative time constants. The optimum proportional band is set relative to the undamped proportional band P , which produced the uniform oscillation. Table 8-4 lists the tuning rules for a lag-dominant process. A uniform cycle can also be forced using on/off control to cycle the manipulated variable between two limits. The period of the cycle will be close to if the cycle is symmetrical the peak-to-peak amphtude of the controlled variable divided by the difference between the output limits A, is a measure of process gain at that period and is therefore related to for the proportional cycle ... 

Derived from molecular arguments, Eq. (14) is correct for any extension ratio of the freely-jointed chain. In spite of its generality, the use of Eq. (14) is limited due to mathematical complexity. To account for the finite extensibility of the chain, the approximate finitely extensible nonlinear elastic (FENE) law proposed by Warner has gained popularity due to its ease of computation [33] ... 

Another way in which to gain structural information concerning the N-terminal residue of glycophorins A" and A is to study the N-terminal, mono[ C]methyl derivatives these are produced by using limited amounts of [ C]formaldehyde. There are distinct differences between the N, N -di[ C]methylamino and N -mono[ C]methylamino species (i) a significant, chemical-shift difference exists between the N-terminal dimethyl and monomethyl species (43 and 34 p.p.m.) (li) all of the C resonances of the N-terminal dimethyl species move upheld as the pH is increased (if they move at all), whereas all of the C resonances of the N-terminal, monomethyl species move downfield as the pH is increased and (in) A for the N-terminal monomethyl species tends to be much larger than that for the N-terminal dimethyl species. Point (in) would tend to indicate that it may be more advantageous to study the N-terminal monomethyl species. However, because of allowable protein concentrations, detection limits on available instruments, and technical difficulties, it has thus far... 

Note that if we have chosen the other possibility of u = 0, meaning where the closed-loop poles are on the real axis, the ultimate gain is Kc u = 0, which is consistent with the other limit obtained using the Routh criterion. The result of direct substitution confirms the inequality derived from the Routh criterion, which should not be a surprise. 

---