Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Delta function distribution, catalyst activity

The objective here is to simulate duct reactor performance with nonuniform catalyst activity and identify optimal deposition strategies when reactant diffn-sion toward the active surface is hindered, particularly in the corners of the flow channel. Both types of power-function profiles, listed in Table 23-3, are evaluated for n = 1,2,4, 8. The delta-function distribution has been implemented by Varma (see Morbidelli et al., 1985) to predict optimum catalyst performance in porous pellets with exothermic chemical reaction. Nonuniform activity profiles for catalytic pellets in fixed-bed reactors, in which a single reaction occnrs, have been addressed by Sznkiewicz et al. (1995), and effectiveness factors for... [Pg.620]

The effects of non-uniform distribution of the catalytic material within the support in the performance of catalyst pellets started receiving attention in the late 60 s (cf 1-4). These, as well as later studies, both theoretical and experimental, demonstrated that non-uniformly distributed catalysts can offer superior conversion, selectivity, durability, and thermal sensitivity characteristics over those wherein the activity is uniform. Work in this area has been reviewed by Gavriilidis et al. (5). Recently, Wu et al. (6) showed that for any catalyst performance index (i.e. conversion, selectivity or yield) and for the most general case of an arbitrary number of reactions, following arbitrary kinetics, occurring in a non-isothermal pellet, with finite external mass and heat transfer resistances, the optimal catalyst distribution remains a Dirac-delta function. [Pg.410]

Figure 9.6 Total conversion for inert membrane reactor with catalyst on the feed side (IMRCF), catalytic membrane reactor (CMR) and conventional fixed-bed reactor (FBR) with uniform and Dirac delta catalyst activity distributions as a function of the dimensionless residence time [Yeung et al., 1994]... Figure 9.6 Total conversion for inert membrane reactor with catalyst on the feed side (IMRCF), catalytic membrane reactor (CMR) and conventional fixed-bed reactor (FBR) with uniform and Dirac delta catalyst activity distributions as a function of the dimensionless residence time [Yeung et al., 1994]...
Figure 9.7 Effect of location of Dirac delta catalyst activity distribution on toul conversion as a function of dimensionless residence time for (a) IMRCF (b) CMR and (c) FBR [Yeung etal., 1994]... Figure 9.7 Effect of location of Dirac delta catalyst activity distribution on toul conversion as a function of dimensionless residence time for (a) IMRCF (b) CMR and (c) FBR [Yeung etal., 1994]...
A non-uniform and precisely controlled position of the catalyst within the membrane pores can impact the reactor performance positively [17]. A modeling study on the first-order reaction in a catalytic membrane indicates that a Dirac-delta function of the concentration of catalyst in the membrane, placed at the feed side, allows the highest conversions. In other words, it is better to promote the reaction as close to the membrane as possible (on its surface), letting the rest of the membrane work as a mere separator of some of the reaction products [24]. The membrane structure is critical to the preparation of non-uniform catalytic membranes. If a sufficiently homogeneous membrane structure is present, simple impregnation may be sufficient to obtain a controlled, non-uniform distribution of active materials. [Pg.53]


See other pages where Delta function distribution, catalyst activity is mentioned: [Pg.115]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.200]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.620 ]




SEARCH



Activating function

Activation function

Active functional

Activity distribution

Catalyst, function

Catalysts functional

Delta

Delta distribution

Delta function

Functional activation

Functional activity

Functionalization catalysts

Functions activity

© 2024 chempedia.info