Cumulative state density

The RRKM rate coefficient is computed using the expression Equation (6.21). The cumulative state density at the transition state in the semiclassical adiabatic approximation is given by Equation (6.24). The molecular density of states p(E,J) is obtained by the numerical derivative of Equation (6.14). The overall factor of 2/ + 1, not included in these formulae, thus cancels in the final expression. The result for J=0 versus energy above the dissociation limit, 48.4... 

The inclusion of overall rotation into the reactive problem proceeds analogously to the formalism introduced for the bound problem. A principle axis analysis of the complex with fixed values of (x,s) produces rotational constants that explicitly depend on (x,s), Ii(x,s) where i=l-3. For a symmetric top approximation to the rotational energy levels, we get the rotational-vibrational cumulative state density at the TS of... 

Fig. 21 The cumulative state density at the inner transition state as a function of the dihedral angle. The calculation was carried out for E = 5000 cm above the entrance channel zero point and includes vibration only. Under these conditions, state density near TS2 dominates over TS2. ...

Table 4 Cumulative charges q and cumulative spin densities SD of the phosphatoxy groups in ground and transition states of phosphatoxy alkyl radicals 13a- 13e as calculated at the UB3LYP/6-3 lG(d)//UB3LYP/6-3 lG(d) level of theory38 14...

The same result can also be obtained directly from the virial equation of state given above and the low-density fonn of g(r). B2(T) is called the second virial coefficient and the expansion of P in powers of is known as the virial expansion, of which the leading non-ideal temi is deduced above. The higher-order temis in the virial expansion for P and in the density expansion of g(r) can be obtained using the methods of cluster expansion and cumulant expansion. 

This expression gives the cumulative density of absorbing states between energies 0 and E (note the change of sign in front of e). This expression can be used to estimate the total excited state absorption by computing... 

It is clear that the strong form of the QCT is impossible to obtain from either the isolated or open evolution equations for the density matrix or Wigner function. For a generic dynamical system, a localized initial distribution tends to distribute itself over phase space and either continue to evolve in complicated ways (isolated system) or asymptote to an equilibrium state (open system) - whether classically or quantum mechanically. In the case of conditioned evolution, however, the distribution can be localized due to the information gained from the measurement. In order to quantify how this happ ens, let us first apply a cumulant expansion to the (fine-grained) conditioned classical evolution (5), resulting in the equations for the centroids (x = (t), P= (P ,... 

For degenerate states a problem arises with the definition of cumulants. We consider here only spin degeneracy. Spatial degeneracy can be discussed on similar lines. For S 0 there are (2S + 1) different Afs-values for one S. The n-particle density matrix p Ms) = of a single one of these states does not... 

The easiest and, in many respects, the most satisfactory way is to consider only the totally symmetric tensor components (i.e., the spin-free density matrices) and to define the spin-free cumulants in terms of these [17, 30]. This corresponds to replacing the considered state by an Ms-averaged ensemble. 

Unlike the density cumulant expansion, which can in principle be exact for certain states (such as Slater determinants), the operator cumulant expansion is never exact, in the sense that we cannot reproduce the full spectrum of a three-particle operator faithfully by an operator of reduced particle rank. However, if the density cumulant expansion is good for the state of interest, we expect the operator cumulant expansion to also be good for that state and also for states nearby. 

In a more complex situation than that of two electrons occupying each its orbital one can expect much more sophisticated interconnections between the total spin and two-electron densities than those demonstrated above. The general statement follows from the theorem given in [72] which states that no one-electron density can depend on the permutation symmetry properties and thus on the total spin of the wave function. For that reason the difference between states of different total spin is concentrated in the cumulant. If there is no cumulant there is no chance to describe this difference. This explains to some extent the failure of almost 40 years of attempts to squeeze the TMCs into the semiempirical HFR theory by extending the variety of the two-electron integrals included in the parameterization. 

Further pragmatic moves are described in details in numerous books and reviews of which we cite the most concise and recent Ref. [82], Two further hypotheses are an important complement to the above cited theorems. One is the locality hypothesis, another is the Kohn-Sham representation of the single determinant reference state in terms of orbitals. The locality has been seriously questioned by Nesbet in recent papers [83,84], however, it remains the only practically implemented solution for the DFT. The single determinant form of the reference state in its turn guarantees that all the averages of the electron-electron interaction appearing in this context are in fact calculated with the two-electron density given by the determinant term in Eq. (5) with no cumulant. 

Mass loss from the samples was measured using an analytical balance with an accuracy of 0.1 mg. Wear volume was calculated from the mass loss and the bulk density of each material. Cumulative volume loss was plotted as a function of the amount of erodent impacting on the surface. The steady state erosion rate, defined as the volume loss from the specimen per unit mass of erodent used, was determined from the slope of the linear part of the plot of volume loss against mass of erodent. 

---