Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Coupled cluster first-order

In terms of the Lagrangian densities, we may calculate coupled-cluster first-order properties in the same way as for variational wave functions, contracting the density-matrix elements with the molecular integrals [17]. The Lagrangian density matrices are also known as the variational or relaxed density matrices. For a closed-shell CCSD wave function, an expression for the one-electron variational density matrix is derived in Exercise 13.5. [Pg.155]

To derive working expressions for the dispersion coefficients Dabcd we need the power series expansion of the first-order and second-order responses of the cluster amplitudes and the Lagrangian multipliers in their frequency arguments. In Refs. [22,29] we have introduced the coupled cluster Cauchy vectors ... [Pg.120]

From these expressions, it is evident that the steep increase of the computational cost with X (the basis-set hierarchy) and m (the coupled-cluster hierarchy) severely restricts the levels of theory that can be routinely used for large systems or even explored for small systems. Nevertheless, we shall see that, with current computers, it is possible to arrange the calculations in such a manner that chemical accuracy (of the order of 1 kcal/mol 4 kJ/mol) can be achieved - at least for molecules containing not more than ten first-row atoms. [Pg.5]

The prerequisites for high accuracy are coupled-cluster calculations with the inclusion of connected triples [e.g., CCSD(T)], either in conjunction with R12 theory or with correlation-consistent basis sets of at least quadruple-zeta quality followed by extrapolation. In addition, harmonic vibrational corrections must always be included. For small molecules, such as those contained in Table 1.11, such calculations have errors of the order of a few kJ/mol. To reduce the error below 1 kJ/mol, connected quadruples must be taken into account, together with anhar-monic vibrational and first-order relativistic corrections. In practice, the approximate treatment of connected triples in the CCSD(T) model introduces an error (relative to CCSDT) that often tends to cancel the... [Pg.26]

However, until today no systematic comparison of methods based on MpUer-Plesset perturbation (MP) and Coupled Cluster theory, the SOPPA or multiconfigurational linear response theory has been presented. The present study is a first attempt to remedy this situation. Calculations of the rotational g factor of HF, H2O, NH3 and CH4 were carried out at the level of Hartree-Fock (SCF) and multiconfigurational Hartree-Fock (MCSCF) linear response theory, the SOPPA and SOPPA(CCSD) [40], MpUer-Plesset perturbation theory to second (MP2), third (MP3) and fourth order without the triples contributions (MP4SDQ) and finally coupled cluster singles and doubles theory. The same basis sets and geometries were employed in all calculations for a given molecule. The results obtained with the different methods are therefore for the first time direct comparable and consistent conclusions about the performance of the different methods can be made. [Pg.470]

First, we note that the determination of the exact many-particle operator U is equivalent to solving for the full interacting wavefunction ik. Consequently, some approximation must be made. The ansatz of Eq. (2) recalls perturbation theory, since (as contrasted with the most general variational approach) the target state is parameterized in terms of a reference iko- A perturbative construction of U is used in the effective valence shell Hamiltonian theory of Freed and the generalized Van Vleck theory of Kirtman. However, a more general way forward, which is not restricted to low order, is to determine U (and the associated amplitudes in A) directly. In our CT theory, we adopt the projection technique as used in coupled-cluster theory [17]. By projecting onto excited determinants, we obtain a set of nonlinear amplitude equations, namely,... [Pg.351]

It is appropriate at this point to compare some formal properties of the three general approaches to dynamical correlation that we have introduced configuration interaction, perturbation theory, and the coupled-cluster approach. First, we note that taken fax enough (all degrees of excitation in Cl and CC, infinite order of perturbation theory) all three approaches will give the same answer. Indeed, in a complete one-paxticle basis all three will then give the exact answer. We axe concerned in this section with the properties of truncated Cl and CC methods and finite-order perturbation theory. [Pg.338]

MBPT starts with the partition of the Hamiltonian into H = H0 + V. The basic idea is to use the known eigenstates of H0 as the starting point to find the eigenstates of H. The most advanced solutions to this problem, such as the coupled-cluster method, are iterative well-defined classes of contributions are iterated until convergence, meaning that the perturbation is treated to all orders. Iterative MBPT methods have many advantages. First, they are economical and still capable of high accuracy. Only a few selected states are treated and the size of a calculation scales thus modestly with the basis set used to carry out the perturbation expansion. Radial basis sets that are complete in some discretized space can be used [112, 120, 121], and the basis... [Pg.274]

Since the Dirac equation is written for one electron, the real problem of ah initio methods for a many-electron system is an accurate treatment of the instantaneous electron-electron interaction, called electron correlation. The latter is of the order of magnitude of relativistic effects and may contribute to a very large extent to the binding energy and other properties. The DCB Hamiltonian (Equation 3) accounts for the correlation effects in the first order via the Vy term. Some higher order of magnitude correlation effects are taken into account by the configuration interaction (Cl), the many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) and by the presently most accurate coupled cluster (CC) technique. [Pg.40]

Kucharski SA, Bartlett RJ (1986) First-order many-body perturbation theory and its relationship to various coupled-cluster approaches. Adv Quantum Chem 18 281-344... [Pg.133]


See other pages where Coupled cluster first-order is mentioned: [Pg.138]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.71]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.237 , Pg.238 ]




SEARCH



Cluster coupled

First-order coupling

Order coupling

© 2024 chempedia.info