Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Coulomb interaction derivative properties

Oppenheimer approximation, 517-542 Coulomb interaction, 527-542 first-order derivatives, 529-535 second-order derivatives, 535-542 normalization factor, 517 nuclei interaction terms, 519-527 overlap integrals, 518-519 permutational symmetry, group theoretical properties, 670—674... [Pg.67]

Temkin was the first to derive the ideal solution model for an ionic solution consisting of more than one sub-lattice [13]. An ionic solution, molten or solid, is considered as completely ionized and to consist of charged atoms anions and cations. These anions and cations are distributed on separate sub-lattices. There are strong Coulombic interactions between the ions, and in the solid state the positively charged cations are surrounded by negatively charged anions and vice versa. In the Temkin model, the local chemical order present in the solid state is assumed to be present also in the molten state, and an ionic liquid is considered using a quasi-lattice approach. If the different anions and the different cations have similar physical properties, it is assumed that the cations mix randomly at the cation sub-lattice and the anions randomly at the anion sub-lattice. [Pg.285]

As already mentioned, in contrast to the cobaltocenium moiety, the ferrocene derivatives represent neutral redox-active receptors for anions. As we are losing coulombic interactions, the complexation is mediated solely via hydrogen bonding. Consequently, the corresponding association constants can be evaluated only in HB non-competitive solvents and they are usually much lower when compared with those of cobaltocenium derivatives. This apparent disadvantage is compensated by the much higher synthetic potential of ferrocene (commercial availability of many derivatives, much easier synthetic handling) and the excellent electrochemical properties of this compound. [Pg.70]

One of the initial motivations for pressure studies was to suppress the CDW transitions in TTF-TCNQ and its derivatives and thereby stabilize a metallic, and possibly superconducting, state at low temperatures [2]. Experiments on TTF-TCNQ and TSeF-TCNQ [27] showed an increase in the CDW or Peierls transition temperatures (Tp) with pressure, as shown in Fig. 12 [80], Later work on materials such as HMTTF-TCNQ showed that the transitions could be suppressed by pressure, but a true metallic state was not obtained up to about 30 kbar [81]. Instead, the ground state was very reminiscent of the semimetallic behavior observed for HMTSF-TCNQ, as shown by the resistivity data in Fig. 13. One possible mechanism for the formation of a semimetallic state is that, as proposed by Weger [82], it arises simply from hybridization of donor and acceptor wave functions. However, diffuse x-ray scattering lines [34] and reasonably sharp conductivity anomalies are often observed, so in many cases incommensurate lattice distortions must play a role. In other words, a semimetallic state can also arise when the Q vector of the CDW does not destroy the whole Fermi surface (FS) but leaves small pockets of holes and electrons. Such a situation is particularly likely in two-chain materials, where the direction of Q is determined not just by the FS nesting properties but by the Coulomb interaction between CDWs on the two chains [10]. [Pg.380]

Interpreting bulk properties qualitatively on the basis of microscopic properties requires only consideration of the long-range attractive forces and short-range repulsive forces between molecules it is not necessary to take into account the details of molecular shapes. We have already shown one kind of potential that describes these intermolecular forces, the Lennard-Jones 6-12 potential used in Section 9.7 to obtain corrections to the ideal gas law. In Section 10.2, we discuss a variety of intermolecular forces, most of which are derived from electrostatic (Coulomb) interactions, but which are expressed as a hierarchy of approximations to exact electrostatic calculations for these complex systems. [Pg.410]

Binding selectivities can be increased by polar interactions, e.g., Coulomb interactions or hydrogen bonds, between functional groups of CD derivatives and functional groups at the guest. Recently, we demonstrated the superior binding properties of hepta-6-5-6-deoxy- i-CD derivatives towards the cancer treatment dmg camptothecin [47],... [Pg.17]

Electrostatic interactions can be most simply modeled as the Coulomb interaction between partial atomic charges, while the repulsion-dispersion part is usually described by a Lennard-Jones or, more accurately, an exp-6 form, each of which contains parameters that must be fixed. High-quality empirically fitted parameter sets have been developed, where the atom-atom interactions are parameterized to reproduce the structures, sublimation enthalpies and, sometimes, further observable properties of organic molecular crystals [73,74]. Their use has been very effective in CSP. Nonempirical approaches to fitting intermolecular force fields, where the parameters are derived from quantum mechanical calculations, have occasionally been applied for CSP [75-78], but these are currently limited to small molecules, so currently lack relevance for typical pharmaceutical molecules. [Pg.103]

PM3, developed by James J.P. Stewart, is a reparameterization of AMI, which is based on the neglect of diatomic differential overlap (NDDO) approximation. NDDO retains all one-center differential overlap terms when Coulomb and exchange integrals are computed. PM3 differs from AMI only in the values of the parameters. The parameters for PM3 were derived by comparing a much larger number and wider variety of experimental versus computed molecular properties. Typically, non-bonded interactions are less repulsive in PM3 than in AMI. PM3 is primarily used for organic molecules, but is also parameterized for many main group elements. [Pg.129]


See other pages where Coulomb interaction derivative properties is mentioned: [Pg.43]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.958]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.2503]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.293]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.527 , Pg.528 , Pg.529 , Pg.530 , Pg.531 , Pg.532 , Pg.533 , Pg.534 , Pg.535 , Pg.536 , Pg.537 , Pg.538 , Pg.539 , Pg.540 , Pg.541 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.527 , Pg.528 , Pg.529 , Pg.530 , Pg.531 , Pg.532 , Pg.533 , Pg.534 , Pg.535 , Pg.536 , Pg.537 , Pg.538 , Pg.539 , Pg.540 , Pg.541 ]




SEARCH



Coulomb interaction

Coulombic interaction

Derivative properties

© 2024 chempedia.info