Correlation terms magnitude

It is interesting to analyse the magnitude of the correlation terms. We have calculated their value in our test example (the Beryllium atom grotmd state) and we report in table 2 an extract of the results. 

For very flexible polymer chains the magnitudes of the correlation terms decrease with increasing dipole separation. This suggests that we might obtain some insight into possible modes of motion by considering only the correlation function Foit) = [Pg.280]

Dispersion In tubes, and particiilarly in packed beds, the flow pattern is disturbed by eddies diose effect is taken into account by a dispersion coefficient in Fick s diffusion law. A PFR has a dispersion coefficient of 0 and a CSTR of oo. Some rough correlations of the Peclet number uL/D in terms of Reynolds and Schmidt numbers are Eqs. (23-47) to (23-49). There is also a relation between the Peclet number and the value of n of the RTD equation, Eq. (7-111). The dispersion model is sometimes said to be an adequate representation of a reaclor with a small deviation from phig ffow, without specifying the magnitude ol small. As a point of superiority to the RTD model, the dispersion model does have the empirical correlations that have been cited and can therefore be used for design purposes within the limits of those correlations. 

The first possibility envisages essentially the same mechanism as for the second-order process, but with Bt2 replacing solvent in the rate-determining conversion to an ion pair. The second mechanism pictures Bt2 attack on a reversibly formed ion-pair intermediate. The third mechanism postulates collide of a ternary complex tiiat is structurally similar to the initial charge-transfer complex but has 2 1 bromine alkene stoichiometry. There are very striking similarities between the second-order and third-order processes in terms of magnitude of p values and product distribution. In feet, there is a quantitative correlation between the rates of the two processes over a broad series of alkenes, which can be expressed as... 

The central difficulty in applying Equations (11.42) and (11.43) is the usual one of estimating parameters. Order-of-magnitude values for the liquid holdup and kiA are given for packed beds in Table 11.3. Empirical correlations are unusually difficult for trickle beds. Vaporization of the liquid phase is common. From a formal viewpoint, this effect can be accounted for through the mass transfer term in Equation (11.42) and (11.43). In practice, results are specific to a particular chemical system and operating mode. Most models are proprietary. 

Equation (1) consists of various resistance terms. l/Kj a is the gas absorption resistance, while 1/ K,a corresponds to the maleic anhydride diffusion resistance and l/i k represents the chemical reaction resistance. The reaction rate data obtained under the reaction conditions of 250°C and 70 atm were plotted according to equation (1). Although catalytic reaction data with respect to time on stream were not shown here, a linear correlation between reaction rate data and catalyst loading was observed as shown in Fig. 2. The gas absorption resistance (1/ a) was -1.26 h, while the combined reaction-diffusion resistance (lJK,a + 1 T]k) was determined to be 5.57 h. The small negative value of gas absorption resistance indicates that the gas-liquid diffusion resistance was very small and had several orders of magnitude less than the chanical reaction resistance, as similarly observed for the isobutene hydration over Amberlyst-15 in a slurry reactor [6]. This indicates that absorption of malei c anhydride in solvent was a rapid process compared to the reaction rate on the catalyst surface. 

---